As an experimentation, I started Tomcat with
“-Dorg.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioSelectorShared=false”, and
“selectorPool.maxSelectors” set to 1000, the same as the number of threads.
This problem didn’t happen with that setting. Even with
“selectorPool.maxSelectors” set to 1, it was noticeably sl
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the quick response.
Yes, the clients were being throttled. These throttled requests were slow to
start with and there was no noticeable difference in the download speed when
the problem occurred. The smaller download started out OK. But after 10-15
successful serial reques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thuc,
On 8/31/17 11:25 AM, Thuc Nguyen wrote:
> We run JFrog Artifactory which is fronted by Tomcat 8.0.32. We
> recently upgraded from Tomcat 7.0.56. Since the upgrade,
> Artifactory occasionally slows to a crawl.
Any chance of using the latest To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 11/20/2009 5:32 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
> Why are they in the Session rather than anywhere else? Why do they
> exist at all?
To improve performance, of course!
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comm
2009/11/20 div.gcet
>
> Hi all,
>
>I am developing a web application using Tomcat 6.0 and MyEclipse
> IDE. For my requirements i have to store a lot of (100-200) Lists objects
> in my sessions. And any list may be associated with a lot other objects,
> because of this the performance of
On 20/11/2009 10:14, div.gcet wrote:
Hi all,
I am developing a web application using Tomcat 6.0 and MyEclipse
IDE. For my requirements i have to store a lot of (100-200) Lists objects
in my sessions. And any list may be associated with a lot other objects,
because of this the performa
Hi Christopher,
thank you for your reply.
From: Christopher Schultz<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Hagen wrote:
> > I am currently developing an application that handles uploads of big
> > files using HTTP PUT.
>
> > The client is a Java client writing 32K blocks to the server using
> > chunked st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Performance problem on HTTP PUT of large binary data
>>
>> - From java.io.InputStream javadoc:
>> "Reads
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Performance problem on HTTP PUT of large binary data
>
> - From java.io.InputStream javadoc:
> "Reads some number of bytes from the input stream and stores
> them into the buffer array b. The number of b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel,
Daniel Hagen wrote:
> I am currently developing an application that handles uploads of big
> files using HTTP PUT.
> The client is a Java client writing 32K blocks to the server using
> chunked streaming mode with 32K chunk size.
>
> On per
secs, and then deployment info appears. Is this
tomcat and if yes what can I do about this?
Regards,
Michal
- Original Message -
From: "Zack Grafton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: Performance pro
Zack
Michal Glowacki wrote:
That is right, only for the first time, even 10-12 secs, but later
maximum 2.
Thanks for all help,
Michal
- Original Message - From: "Zack Grafton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 5
That is right, only for the first time, even 10-12 secs, but later maximum
2.
Thanks for all help,
Michal
- Original Message -
From: "Zack Grafton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: Perfo
Michal,
Your JSP files will be compiled regardless the first time they are
accessed. If you try refreshing the page, or loading it in a different
browser, you might notice a speed up. You can also precompile your JSP
files and that should also speed up the first access. Please let us
know
En l'instant précis du 02/15/07 13:02, Michal Glowacki s'exprimait en
ces termes:
> Thank you for your fast response!
>
>> Which version of EJB. Local EJB of remote EJB? With or without security?
>> EJBs have the bad reputation to be slow, and cubersome to develop
>> (probably improved in version 3
Thank you for your fast response!
Which version of EJB. Local EJB of remote EJB? With or without security?
EJBs have the bad reputation to be slow, and cubersome to develop
(probably improved in version 3, this was an aim at sun)
It's EJB 2.1 (JBoss 4). I'm using remote interfaces everywhere,
En l'instant précis du 02/15/07 12:40, Michal Glowacki s'exprimait en
ces termes:
> Hi
>
> I'm quite new to Jboss/Tomcat, so please forgive me if my questions are
> without sense...
>
> I have created a JSF application that uses EJB. It deploys successfully, but
> the thing that concerns me is:
17 matches
Mail list logo