Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-14 Thread Manuel Fernández Panzuela
Thank you Rainer, Now Apache is working with disable mode. Maybe later it changed again. :) 2011/6/12 Rainer Jung > On 12.06.2011 09:30, Manuel Fernández Panzuela wrote: > > Is possible to combine both attributes distance - activation ? > > Distance looks like a very interesting attribute. > >

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-12 Thread Rainer Jung
On 12.06.2011 09:30, Manuel Fernández Panzuela wrote: > Is possible to combine both attributes distance - activation ? > Distance looks like a very interesting attribute. Yes, of course you can combine. As long as you don't cnfuse yourself because it gets too complicated. Distace (e.g. 0 and 1) w

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-12 Thread Manuel Fernández Panzuela
Is possible to combine both attributes distance - activation ? Distance looks like a very interesting attribute. Regards 2011/6/11 Rainer Jung > On 08.06.2011 12:12, Felix Schumacher wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández > > Panzuela: > >> Yes Felix, you

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.06.2011 12:12, Felix Schumacher wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández > Panzuela: >> Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances. >> I want primary node receives all requests and on failure send requests to >> the secondary node. >> Is it possib

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-08 Thread Manuel Fernández Panzuela
Woowww Now, mod_jk is working perfectly Thank you so much FELIX !!! Best regards 2011/6/8 Felix Schumacher > Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández > Panzuela: > > Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances. > > I want primary node receives all requests

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-08 Thread Felix Schumacher
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández Panzuela: > Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances. > I want primary node receives all requests and on failure send requests to > the secondary node. > Is it possible with your recomendation ? You may also want to rea

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-08 Thread Manuel Fernández Panzuela
Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances. I want primary node receives all requests and on failure send requests to the secondary node. Is it possible with your recomendation ? worker.43m2g1.activation=d degraded ??? is a condition ? then all requests will be redirected to 43m2g1 ??

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-08 Thread Felix Schumacher
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 08:41 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández Panzuela: > my setup: > > # Define list of workers that will be used for mapping requests > worker.list=loadbalancer43,status > > # Definicion de plantilla > worker.template43.port=8009 > worker.template43.type=ajp13 > worker.templ

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-07 Thread Manuel Fernández Panzuela
my setup: # Define list of workers that will be used for mapping requests worker.list=loadbalancer43,status # Definicion de plantilla worker.template43.port=8009 worker.template43.type=ajp13 worker.template43.lbfactor=1 worker.template43.ping_timeout=1000 worker.template43.socket_timeout=10 worke

Re: Mod_jk working for failover

2011-06-07 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manuel. On 6/7/2011 12:38 PM, Manuel Fernández Panzuela wrote: > I want to work with mod_jk in failover mode. I do not want to balancing > petitions until the node 1 is unavailable. If principal node (node 1) is > down, then petitions will be redirect