On 14.06.2011 13:07, Orgil Tulga wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am using apache and tomcat with mod_jk.
> apache version : 2.2.19
> tomcat version : 6.0
> mod_jk version : 1.2.30
>
> My web runs through servlet.
>
> http://domainname:8080/contact.shtml - is working
> http://domainname/contact.sh
On 14 June 2011 12:49, Orgil Tulga wrote:
> No. I am testing on local domain.
I don't understand this. The ajp13 bit in your jkmount.conf needs to
refer to a worker in workers.properties.
We would need to see it to understand what's happening.
This might help you a little?
http://tomcat.apache.o
No. I am testing on local domain.
--- On Tue, 6/14/11, Calum wrote:
From: Calum
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2011, 4:35 AM
On 14 June 2011 12:28, Orgil Tulga wrote:
> My jk connector config is below.
>
&g
On 14 June 2011 12:28, Orgil Tulga wrote:
> My jk connector config is below.
>
> Below is jk.conf:
>
> JkWorkersFile /usr/local/jakarta/tomcat/conf/workers.properties
Can we see this?
-
To unsubscribe, e
pd.conf
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
Include "/usr/local/apache/conf/jk.conf"
Include "/usr/local/apache/conf/jkmount.conf"
--- On Tue, 6/14/11, Calum wrote:
From: Calum
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2011, 4
On 14 June 2011 12:07, Orgil Tulga wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am using apache and tomcat with mod_jk.
> apache version : 2.2.19
> tomcat version : 6.0
> mod_jk version : 1.2.30
>
> My web runs through servlet.
>
> http://domainname:8080/contact.shtml - is working
> http://domainname/contact.shtml
On 08.06.2010 16:45, Mangold, Daniel wrote:
On 07.06.2010 20:22, Mangold, Daniel wrote:
First: sorry, it looks like at least half of my previous mail was truncated for
whatever reason. The attachment did not go through as well. And it's true, the
pasted log file above is not complete.
However,
On 07.06.2010 20:22, Mangold, Daniel wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> I have a problem with mod_jk (hope this is the right place form my problem).
>
> Used servers and versions:
> - Apache 2.2.15 (Win32)
> - mod_jk/1.2.30
> - Apache Tomcat/6.0.20 using AJP/1.3
> - jdk1.5.0_12
>
> Problem description:
> I
On 07.06.2010 20:22, Mangold, Daniel wrote:
Hello to all,
I have a problem with mod_jk (hope this is the right place form my problem).
Used servers and versions:
- Apache 2.2.15 (Win32)
- mod_jk/1.2.30
- Apache Tomcat/6.0.20 using AJP/1.3
- jdk1.5.0_12
Problem description:
I enter the appropri
> From: Maciej Zabielski [mailto:m...@tessel.pl]
> Subject: RE: mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and
> Tomcat
>
> when I started reading what is the easiest way to make Tomcat
> available on port 80 (under Centos 5.3) the most common
> answer was: use Ap
ds,
Maciej
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 2:14 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and Tomcat
One real question is why you are bothering with an Apache httpd in
front
One real question is why you are bothering with an Apache httpd in
front, since unless I saw this wrong, you are proxying absolutely
everything to Tomcat, in both virtual hosts.
JkMount /* etc..
Why not just turn off Apache, and have Tomcat listen on port 80 ?
You would save yourself some compl
ost2:8080/app2
Well, I would have to think it over tommorow as its almost midnight in country!
:)
Once more, thank you very much for pointing out my mistake!
___
From: Tsirkin Evgeny [tsir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 8:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users Lis
On 07.10.2009 19:40, Maciej Zabielski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and Tomcat
>
> My setup is
> Centos 5.3 + Apache HTTPD 2.2.3 + Tomcat 5
>
> httpd.conf contains (Just before section 3) Basic mod_jk directives.
> At the end it contains two vir
What Chuck means is that you need
docBase="/var/lib/tomcat5/webapps/alfresco"
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Maciej Zabielski [mailto:m...@tessel.pl]
> > Subject: mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and Tomcat
> >
> From: Maciej Zabielski [mailto:m...@tessel.pl]
> Subject: mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and Tomcat
>
> Tomcat Host
> autoDeploy="true"
> xmlValidation="false" xmlNamespaceAware="false">
>
> alfresco.domain.com
>
I can't advise you about the httpd-rel
On 15.04.2009 08:19, Munkhbold.B wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I have a problem with tomcat connector mod_jk.
>
> From time to time the connector completely hangs apache.
>
> Tomcat alone is still alive, but apache no longer replies to requests, and I
> need to restart both
>
>
>
> In mod_jk logs
yes. my configuration is just a suggestion. if you just need to fix the
problem quickly, maybe you need to try some solutions. But the main idea to
solve this problem is you need to do some tests to find out where the
bottleneck is.
I did a lots of tests, because my server chain is too long httpd
WenDong Zhang wrote:
I've the same problem too, and I found that if the tomcat response time is
long, you need to set connection_pool in your workers.properties.
Ok, let me be more explicit.
What you suggest above may work, /if/ the underlying reason for the
problem meets certain criteria. Bu
I've the same problem too, and I found that if the tomcat response time is
long, you need to set connection_pool in your workers.properties.
## my properties
worker.node65.port=8009
worker.node65.host=9.186.10.65
worker.node65.type=ajp13
worker.node65.connection_pool_size=100
worker.node65.connec
Munkhbold.B wrote:
Hi
I have a problem with tomcat connector mod_jk.
From time to time the connector completely hangs apache.
Tomcat alone is still alive, but apache no longer replies to requests, and I
need to restart both
In mod_jk logs file I have a lot of lines like
[info]
can not found anythig in logs.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 02.03.2009 16:57, Partha Goswami wrote:
>
>> Yes..
>>
>
> This is not an answer for an "or" question :(
>
> There is a second item, that seems to be broken:
>
> # Where to put jk
> logsJkLogFile /var/log/httpd
On 02.03.2009 16:57, Partha Goswami wrote:
Yes..
This is not an answer for an "or" question :(
There is a second item, that seems to be broken:
# Where to put jk
logsJkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log
In case Apache doesn't start with mod_jk, you should find an error
either in your Apache
Yes..
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Partha Goswami wrote:
>
>> I compile,mod_jk in my vps everything is fine, but when i am trying to
>> add,
>> following lines, & restarting my apache its not starting anymore pls help
>>
>>
>
> # Set the jk log level
>> [debug/error/info
Partha Goswami wrote:
I compile,mod_jk in my vps everything is fine, but when i am trying to add,
following lines, & restarting my apache its not starting anymore pls help
# Set the jk log level
[debug/error/info]JkLogLevel info
Is this a copy/paste issue or a real config line?
Regards
-
Thanks again Rainer for guiding me toward the core/gdb/stacktrace approach.
After managing to get a meaningfull stacktrace (using gdb httpd core_file)
it was easy to see that the problem was NOT in mod_jk but in another
module (mod_auth_cas). I'll report this problem to them.
Best regards,
Nico
>
> Your test JSP works fine for me with Apache httpd 2.2.6 and mod_jk
> 1.2.25 on Solaris. Since your jk log file ends very early in the request
> processing, the tomcat version should not matter (I used 5.5).
>
> I would guess, that something with your build is broken. It would also
> help, if
Your test JSP works fine for me with Apache httpd 2.2.6 and mod_jk
1.2.25 on Solaris. Since your jk log file ends very early in the request
processing, the tomcat version should not matter (I used 5.5).
I would guess, that something with your build is broken. It would also
help, if we could see yo
I forgot to mention that the request is sent over https.
The https is handled by apache httpd. I am not sure If this has an impact
as it would be difficult for me to test it under http.
Cheers
Nicolas
-
To start a new topic,
Thank you Rainer for taking the time to answer. My comments are below.
>
> Not a known problem. You can increase log level via "JkLogLevel debug".
> There should be a line containing "service" or "Service", which includes
> the URI) we send forward to Tomcat.
>
> The log will also show you, i
Not a known problem. You can increase log level via "JkLogLevel debug".
There should be a line containing "service" or "Service", which includes
the URI) we send forward to Tomcat.
The log will also show you, if any of your JkMount directives match,
i.e. if mod_jk thinks it should forward, or
I agree with Christopher.
If you feel totally uncomfortable with the idea of compiling yourself:
there is a good chance, that the downloadable binary for 2.0.59 will
work with your 2.0.52. You need to test and check the error log of
apache for log lines indicating process crashes. Those would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guy,
Guy Katz wrote:
> Hi;
> Sorry for the beginner's question but does this means that I need to
> compile mod_jk1.2.25 against my apache 2.0.52? Or can I still use the
> 1.2.25 from the tomcat connector downloads page as a drop-in
> replacement.
IM
ECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 8:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] problem serving URIs with 'special characters'
Guy Katz wrote:
> Thanks;
> one question though.
> The downloads page states that mod_jk1.2.25 is for apache 2.0.59 and
later only.
> i ha
Guy Katz wrote:
Thanks;
one question though.
The downloads page states that mod_jk1.2.25 is for apache 2.0.59 and later only.
i have a 2.0.52 installation(on centos) that i can't change. does this mean i
am stuck here? or can mod_jk1.2.25 still work with apache 2.0.52
thanks in advance.
Ye
ssage-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 8/26/2007 11:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] problem serving URIs with 'special characters'
Guy Katz wrote:
> Hi; (using: centos, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.21, tomcat 6)
>
> Recently, I encount
Guy Katz wrote:
Hi; (using: centos, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.21, tomcat 6)
Recently, I encountered a problem with URIs that has 'non western
European' characters (for example:
http://www.somehost.com/roller/admin/entry/nofx_%D7%91%D7%93%D7%A8%D7%9A
). I noticed that apache was forwarding to tom
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] problem serving URIs with 'special characters'
URLEncoding doesn't take care of this problem?
In Response To:
Hi; (using: centos, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.21, tomcat 6)
Recently, I encountered a problem with URIs that has 'non wester
happy to hear ideas but please be more specific.
thanks.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 8/26/2007 10:11 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] problem serving URIs with 'special characters'
URLEncoding do
URLEncoding doesn't take care of this problem?
In Response To:
Hi; (using: centos, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.21, tomcat 6)
Recently, I encountered a problem with URIs that has 'non western
European' characters (for example:
http://www.somehost.com/roller/admin/entry/nofx_%D7%91%D7%93%D7%A8%D7%
o: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
You really should totally drop the idea of rotating an open logfile from
the outside. The file descriptor is open in the writing process and it
will proceed to use the file descriptor, which will point to the rotated
file and after compression
same error/bug that occurred in the
production server, but unfortunately we still can't reproduce it. Any
idea why?
Thanks
Regards
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 21 May 2007 7:26 p.m.
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
ssage-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 21 May 2007 7:26 p.m.
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
Rotating an open log file from outside the using processes is a very bad
idea. The processes in most cases will simply try to use the old log
file further on (and
Rotating an open log file from outside the using processes is a very bad
idea. The processes in most cases will simply try to use the old log
file further on (and will run into trouble, after you compressed them etc.).
Rotating log files for apache can be easily done using the bundles
rotatelo
44 matches
Mail list logo
