David kerber wrote on 05/17/2010 12:43:17 PM:
> On 5/17/2010 2:19 PM, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> > "Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 05/17/2010
> > 12:14:21 PM:
> >
> >>> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> >>>
us ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:43:17 -0400
> From: dcker...@verizon.net
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
>
> On 5/17/2010 2:19 PM, peter_f...@blm.gov w
On 5/17/2010 2:19 PM, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
"Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 05/17/2010
12:14:21 PM:
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
The only 100% secure system is one that is turned off.
Not sure
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
>
> Unplugged then?
Unplugged and encased in lead, perhaps. Preferably in a dark cellar, with no
stairs, in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disu
"Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 05/17/2010
12:14:21 PM:
> > From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> > Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
> >
> > The only 100% secure system is one that is turned off.
>
> Not sure even
Unplugged then?
With today's wake-on-lan, always on NIC connectors, I can see what you
mean.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup ac
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
>
> The only 100% secure system is one that is turned off.
Not sure even that is sufficient...
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE
The only 100% secure system is one that is turned off.
-Original Message-
From: peter_f...@blm.gov [mailto:peter_f...@blm.gov]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
Well, it's the usual thing - you can h
Well, it's the usual thing - you can have a system that's completely open
but gets cratered because some duffer clicked the wrong button. Or you can
have a system that's 100% secure, but nobody can use it because it's 100%
secure. Or you can have something that's "secure enough" to protect from
acc
On 17/05/2010 18:14, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> Pid wrote on 05/17/2010 10:55:06 AM:
>
>> On 17/05/2010 17:48, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
>>> To clarify what I'm up to here - we have an in-house doc that suggests
>>> switching off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup on production systems, and
>>
>> Do
Pid wrote on 05/17/2010 10:55:06 AM:
> On 17/05/2010 17:48, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> > To clarify what I'm up to here - we have an in-house doc that suggests
> > switching off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup on production systems, and
>
> Does it explain why it makes this suggestion?
To preven
On 17/05/2010 17:48, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> To clarify what I'm up to here - we have an in-house doc that suggests
> switching off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup on production systems, and
Does it explain why it makes this suggestion?
> I've been testing those recommendations on an experimen
To clarify what I'm up to here - we have an in-house doc that suggests
switching off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup on production systems, and
I've been testing those recommendations on an experimental setup. What the
in-house doc forgets to say is what you've explained here (and which
answers my o
On 17/05/2010 17:33, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote on 05/17/2010 10:12:20 AM:
>> Not pointless. It limits deployed apps to *only* those defined in
>> server.xml.
>
> Ok - so if I want my app to start I have to place the context element in
> server.xml. I would have thought that an
Mark Thomas wrote on 05/17/2010 10:12:20 AM:
> On 17/05/2010 16:56, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> >
> > I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is supposed
to
> > do, especially when it's set to "false".
>
> It controls if apps are deployed when Tomcat starts.
>
> > The basic que
On 17/05/2010 16:56, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is supposed to
> do, especially when it's set to "false".
>
> The basic question is, what is the purpose of this setting? It would appear
> that if you set it to "false", then applications
Notes inline...
"Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 05/17/2010
10:11:47 AM:
> > From: peter_f...@blm.gov [mailto:peter_f...@blm.gov]
> > Subject: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
> >
> >
> > I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is
> > supposed to do, especially when it's
Oops, forgot to say. I'm on 6.0.26. The online documentation I read is at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/host.html#Automatic%20Application%20Deployment
...which is very clear about what happens with deployOnStartup="true" but
as far as I can see gives no details about what's supp
On 17/05/2010 16:56, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is supposed to
> do, especially when it's set to "false".
It controls if apps are deployed when Tomcat starts.
> The basic question is, what is the purpose of this setting? It would appea
> From: peter_f...@blm.gov [mailto:peter_f...@blm.gov]
> Subject: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
>
>
> I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is
> supposed to do, especially when it's set to "false".
It defers webapp deployment until after the container is up and ru
2010/5/17 :
> There's a couple of places in documentation (online, and also in the
> O'Reilly book) where it says you shouldn't have hot-deployment AND
> deployOnStart enabled because it can result in applications being deployed
> twice
1. For what Tomcat version?
2. Where online? Is it anywhere
21 matches
Mail list logo
