José Manuel Molina Pascual wrote:
Hi, Mladen.
That's exactly what we expected, about 10% improvement.
We are runnning a cluster of 4 tomcats and we have a stress test batery
, I'm not sure of how manu concurrent users it simulates, maybe that's
the point.
Of course it is.
When the concurrency
Hi, Mladen.
That's exactly what we expected, about 10% improvement.
We are runnning a cluster of 4 tomcats and we have a stress test batery
, I'm not sure of how manu concurrent users it simulates, maybe that's
the point.
I've received new test data, when the tests are launched agaist only
one
José Manuel Molina Pascual wrote:
Hello, I just installed Tomcat APR on a SUSE 9 and found that the
performance has fallen dramatically (I fact, performance with APR it's
half than without it).
I followed the instructions of the Tomcat Documentation.
Great.
I suppose that this must be s
I'm using 2.6
On 9/5/06, Andrew Miehs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Which kernel are you using? 2.6 or 2.4?
Andrew
On 05/09/2006, at 3:34 PM, José Manuel Molina Pascual wrote:
> Hello, I just installed Tomcat APR on a SUSE 9 and found that the
> pe
if (your max nr of open connections) < Connector.maxThreads ) then
the regular connector is better, and will always be as it is using
blocking IO
else
APR will scale better, as it can keep a larger set of keep alive
connections open
end
Your biggest gain on the APR connector is if you are u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Which kernel are you using? 2.6 or 2.4?
Andrew
On 05/09/2006, at 3:34 PM, José Manuel Molina Pascual wrote:
Hello, I just installed Tomcat APR on a SUSE 9 and found that the
performance has fallen dramatically (I fact, performance with APR it's
ha
