Re: Jk disable worker on status

2009-03-03 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matteo, On 3/3/2009 12:32 PM, mturra wrote: > But the LB worker doesn't know and continue to send request to this tomcat. > I could use the session method for LB worker, but I have M apache httpd > server connected to N tomcat (full-meshed) and I thin

Re: Jk disable worker on status

2009-03-03 Thread mturra
Christopher Schultz-2 wrote: > > Rainer, > > On 3/2/2009 11:07 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> I think a robust implementation would be something like: >> >> - a new state for temporarily disabling a node, except for sticky >> requests >> >> - a configurable probe request, that the watchdog thread

Re: Jk disable worker on status

2009-03-03 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Chris, On 03.03.2009 17:22, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rainer, On 3/2/2009 11:07 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: I think a robust implementation would be something like: - a new state for temporarily disabling a node, except for sticky requests - a co

Re: Jk disable worker on status

2009-03-03 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rainer, On 3/2/2009 11:07 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > I think a robust implementation would be something like: > > - a new state for temporarily disabling a node, except for sticky requests > > - a configurable probe request, that the watchdog thread s

Re: Jk disable worker on status

2009-03-02 Thread mturra
Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > > Furthermore, disabled is a configuration state. You do not only want it > to be set automatically, but you also need a way of revoking it later. > > I think a robust implemenation would be something like: > > - a new state for temporarily disabling a node, except for

Re: Jk disable worker on status

2009-03-02 Thread mturra
Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > > We don't get any invalidation information from the backend, neither do > we know, whether a request carrying a session id actually belongs to a > valid session. > > So we do not have any immediate way of limiting by session count. > >> There is no disable_on_status

Re: Jk disable worker on status

2009-03-02 Thread Rainer Jung
On 02.03.2009 15:55, mturra wrote: I have a tomcat farm behind an apache httpd cluster, each apache http server have a jk connector connected to three tomcat. Each tomcat have a max active session limit (let's say 10). I configured a load balanced worker with three worker. I would like to disab