On 27.10.2015 17:01, Vinicius Corrêa de Almeida wrote:
I analized some releases and i noticed that not using java 7 features like
multi catch and in java 8 do not use lambda expressions and others
features, so i came by this email to know why the developers not using this
features?
I believe t
On 10/27/2015 12:01 PM, Vinicius Corrêa de Almeida wrote:
I analized some releases and i noticed that not using java 7 features like
multi catch and in java 8 do not use lambda expressions and others
features, so i came by this email to know why the developers not using this
features?
Which ve
On Apr 1, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Satheesh Babu wrote:
> Good Evening!
>
> We're running our production applications in Tomcat 5.5/JRE 1.5, and there is
> a need for us to migrate our applications to Java 7(JRE 1.7). There is no
> information available either on java or on Apace Tomcat site regradin
On 14/03/2012 19:18, pricyber wrote:
> I downloaded the apache source code and commented out the line in
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProperties.setProperties(SocketProperties.java:184)
> where it say
> socket.setTrafficClass(soTrafficClass);
>
> And it works, but not sure if there are any
Any updates on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4674549.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-
I've confirm that -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true made no difference to the
Java 7 setup.
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4661984.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
I confirm that -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true or = false made no differnece
to the Java 7 setup.
Thanks alot!
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4630889.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.c
On 16/03/2012 18:08, pricyber wrote:
> I am doing this at the moment.
I am away all of this week, but I've got a note to look into the traffic
class config on Windows when I get back.
Can you just confirm that setting: -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true made
no difference to the Java 7 setup?
p
>
I am doing this at the moment.
diff
/apache-tomcat-6.0.35-src/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SocketProperties.java
< socket.setTrafficClass(soTrafficClass);
---
> try {
> socket.setTrafficClass(soTrafficClass);
> } catch (Throwable t) {
> //TODO: L
OK.
1. Can you set the address field manually, rather than letting the
defaults run?
I tried with either "localhost", "127.0.0.1" still doesnt work.
Also, can you please log "InetAddress.toString()" immediately before you
do the above line? I suspect Inet4 v Inet6 is the culprit.
Tried wi
On 15/03/2012 01:08, pricyber wrote:
> I did nothing in the xml files, but in the embedded tomcat I did this
> instead.
>
> connector = embedded.createConnector((String)null, port,
> Http11NioProtocol.class.getName());
OK.
1. Can you set the address field manually, rather than letting the
defaul
I did nothing in the xml files, but in the embedded tomcat I did this
instead.
connector = embedded.createConnector((String)null, port,
Http11NioProtocol.class.getName());
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4619650.html
S
I did nothing in the xml files, but in the embedded tomcat I did this
instead.
connector = embedded.createConnector((String)null, port,
Http11NioProtocol.class.getName());
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4619649.html
S
On 14/03/2012 18:04, pricyber wrote:
> It look like a similar issue with Tomcat 7
> http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Tomcat-7-Cluster-Issue-td4562937.html
I couldn't replicate the issue on OSX with Oracle Java 7u4 or OpenJDK.
The other thread referred to NIO configuration in the Cluster, which
imp
I downloaded the apache source code and commented out the line in
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProperties.setProperties(SocketProperties.java:184)
where it say
socket.setTrafficClass(soTrafficClass);
And it works, but not sure if there are any ill effects for doing that.
This problem only o
It look like a similar issue with Tomcat 7
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Tomcat-7-Cluster-Issue-td4562937.html
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4579220.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
I looked at the logs and I find this on Windows 2003 with Java 7 and tomcat
6.0.35
java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument: no further information
at sun.nio.ch.Net.setIntOption0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.Net.setSocketOption(Net.java:279)
at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.setOption(SocketChan
On 1:59 PM, pricyber wrote:
Using Orcale Java 7 u3.
Will try to get some logs.
Thanks A lot!
On 2012-03-11, at 5:38 PM, Pid * [via Tomcat] wrote:
On 11/03/2012 21:07, Pid wrote:
On 11/03/2012 18:28, pricyber wrote:
Yes I used Http11NioProtocol , more specifically I used
Http11NioProtocol
Using Orcale Java 7 u3.
Will try to get some logs.
Thanks A lot!
On 2012-03-11, at 5:38 PM, Pid * [via Tomcat] wrote:
> On 11/03/2012 21:07, Pid wrote:
>
> > On 11/03/2012 18:28, pricyber wrote:
> >> Yes I used Http11NioProtocol , more specifically I used
> >> Http11NioProtocol.class.getName(
On 11/03/2012 21:07, Pid wrote:
> On 11/03/2012 18:28, pricyber wrote:
>> Yes I used Http11NioProtocol , more specifically I used
>> Http11NioProtocol.class.getName() to get the name of the class.
>>
>> The problem only occurs on Windows 2003 with Http11NioProtocol on Java 1.7,
>> It works fine
On 11/03/2012 18:28, pricyber wrote:
> Yes I used Http11NioProtocol , more specifically I used
> Http11NioProtocol.class.getName() to get the name of the class.
>
> The problem only occurs on Windows 2003 with Http11NioProtocol on Java 1.7,
> It works fine with Java 1.6
> Also Http11NioProtocol
Yes I used Http11NioProtocol , more specifically I used
Http11NioProtocol.class.getName() to get the name of the class.
The problem only occurs on Windows 2003 with Http11NioProtocol on Java 1.7, It
works fine with Java 1.6
Also Http11NioProtocol and Java 1.7 works fine with Windows 7 and Windo
2012/3/11 pricyber :
> Using binaries downloaded in a embedded java application.
> I used Http11NIOProtocol, but if I use Http11Protocol, it works fine. So I
> think Http11NIOProtocal is the problem in my setup.
It is Http11NioProtocol. The spelling matters a lot.
> No logs at all when I use H
Using binaries downloaded in a embedded java application.
I used Http11NIOProtocol, but if I use Http11Protocol, it works fine. So I
think Http11NIOProtocal is the problem in my setup.
No logs at all when I use Http11NIOProtocol.
On 2012-03-11, at 9:28 AM, Stefan Mayr-2 [via Tomcat] wrote:
> Am
Am 11.03.2012 11:33, schrieb Pid:
On 11/03/2012 06:25, pricyber wrote:
Hi I recently upgrade JDK from 1.6 to 1.7u3. And tomcat no longer work on
Windows 2003, ie not sending response to any request either with https or
plain http. But the same code/setting works on Windows 7 and my ubuntu
machin
On 11/03/2012 06:25, pricyber wrote:
> Hi I recently upgrade JDK from 1.6 to 1.7u3. And tomcat no longer work on
> Windows 2003, ie not sending response to any request either with https or
> plain http. But the same code/setting works on Windows 7 and my ubuntu
> machine.
Error logs?
Access logs?
André,
On 22.11.2011 20:31, André Warnier wrote:
The reason I'm asking is that for testing some unrelated Java software,
I am being asked to install Java 7 on a system on which currently
happily runs Tomcat 6.x with Java 6 (Oracle), and I'd like to know if I
would be setting myself up for some i
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Java 7
> I believe I remember seeing some comments on the list about there
> being some problems related to the Tomcat/Java 7 relationship.
Tomcat cannot be built with Java 7, but it can be run with it. Make sure you
use the latest ver
28 matches
Mail list logo
