Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread David kerber
Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Java 1.6 I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through the years... Actuall

RE: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Java 1.6 > > Really? Other than crap like auto-boxing, attributes, and > foreach-style 'for' syntax, what has the compiler done for > me, lately? I see all that as syntactic sugar. Agreed, that

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Java 1.6 >> >> I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through >> the years...

RE: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Java 1.6 > > I don't believe that javac has undergone significant upgrades through > the years... Actually, it has, but the big improvements were between 1.3 and 1.5. The javac in Java SE 6 doesn't ap

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, Pid wrote: > I'm not sure if compiling Tomcat under 1.6 would produce even better > performance - I don't know enough about byte code to comment on that, > but some of the more enlightened listers may do. I don't believe that javac has undergone

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel, Daniel M Garland wrote: > Is there any performance increase that you've noticed? Relative to what? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQ

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Pid
Daniel M Garland wrote: > Is there any performance increase that you've noticed? I've not benchmarked it, but our annual traffic high point passed (with a traffic increase) and without the normal tuning and tweaking this time. So I'd have to say anedoctally - yes. I'm not sure if compiling Tomca

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Daniel M Garland
Is there any performance increase that you've noticed? Pid wrote: David Smith wrote: I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in production and have had no issue. Likewise, and they go very nicely indeed. p --David Marco wrote: Hello, I read in previous post t

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread Pid
David Smith wrote: > I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in > production and have had no issue. Likewise, and they go very nicely indeed. p > --David > > Marco wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I read in previous post today that someone wasn't sure whether Java >> 1.6

Re: Java 1.6

2007-09-26 Thread David Smith
I think that was pure speculation. I use JDK 1.6 w/ Tomcat 5.5 in production and have had no issue. --David Marco wrote: Hello, I read in previous post today that someone wasn't sure whether Java 1.6 is compatible with tomcat 5.5. This is new to me. Does anyone know more about this (more