Re: JSP Bean not working

2009-02-12 Thread David Smith
Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: David Smith [mailto:d...@cornell.edu] >> Subject: Re: JSP Bean not working >> >> it's highly recommended that all classes be in a package. >> > > For JSPs, it's not just recommended, it's required b

RE: JSP Bean not working

2009-02-12 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: David Smith [mailto:d...@cornell.edu] > Subject: Re: JSP Bean not working > > it's highly recommended that all classes be in a package. For JSPs, it's not just recommended, it's required by the spec. Servlets can get away with an empty package, JSPs can't

RE: JSP Bean not working

2009-02-12 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: John Byrne [mailto:jby...@snbw.org] > Subject: JSP Bean not working > > 8: JSPs are not allowed to use the default (empty) package; you need to add a package statement to your Client class and include that in the JSP. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWI

Re: JSP Bean not working

2009-02-12 Thread David Smith
Have you considered putting Client in a package and then referencing the package? While people occasionally get away with packageless classes, it's highly recommended that all classes be in a package. --David John Byrne wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I can’t get a simple form to work. The erro