Re: Digest Authentication

2010-02-11 Thread Pid
Please post a completely new message to the list, rather than just editing the subject & body out for your message. An edited reply appears as part of a existing thread, with an unexpected subject change. This is called thread hijacking. p On 11/02/2010 19:13, Stanley Wong wrote: I am u

RE: Digest Authentication

2010-02-11 Thread Stanley Wong
List Subject: RE: Digest Authentication Thank you. I make some progress, but still need some helps. That is what I did: 1. replace the hashing algorithm from SHA to MD5. 2. remove the line from The new section of web.xml looks as follows: DIGEST

RE: Digest Authentication

2010-02-11 Thread Stanley Wong
Thank you. I make some progress, but still need some helps. That is what I did: 1. replace the hashing algorithm from SHA to MD5. 2. remove the line from The new section of web.xml looks as follows: DIGEST MD5 I generate

Re: Digest Authentication

2010-02-11 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/2/11 Caldarale, Charles R : > This is closer, but the doc says to include the realm name, not the word > "Realm" in the calculation.  The realm name appears to be the server name and > port, but I haven't verified that. > The realm name is usually provided as Realm in element in web.xml.

Re: Digest Authentication

2010-02-11 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/2/11 Stanley Wong : > I am using Tomcat 6.0. I try to implement digest authentication. > You are confusing DIGEST authentication (i.e., transmitting a hash of password over network) with validating plain passwords using digest (i.e, not storing a plain text password). The value used in the

RE: Digest Authentication

2010-02-11 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Stanley Wong [mailto:w...@pcigeomatics.com] > Subject: Digest Authentication > > digest -a sha stan1 The Tomcat doc makes no mention of using the stand digest tool, but instead org.apache.catalina.realm.RealmBase. I have no idea if or how they differ in their calculations. > digest -a