Many thanks for your detailed reply.
I looked further at the bug numbers you posted... a couple seem significant
and happen to be patched on my test server (137111-07).
In a couple of my test runs with "AcceptMutex pthread" trailed the tests
with sysvsem, but not conclusively. However, contrary t
On 06.02.2009 20:40, fredk2 wrote:
Do I understand you correctly that when Mr. Orton said to never use pthread
nor posixsem mutex (http://marc.info/?l=apr-dev&m=108720968023158&w=2) that
is now obsolete news and that Solaris perfected pthread mutex support since.
Joe Orton is always very carefu
Thanks Rainer,
Do I understand you correctly that when Mr. Orton said to never use pthread
nor posixsem mutex (http://marc.info/?l=apr-dev&m=108720968023158&w=2) that
is now obsolete news and that Solaris perfected pthread mutex support since.
You mention that mod_jk uses pthread is that the sam
On 06.02.2009 18:13, fredk2 wrote:
I was doing some stress test (with apache ab, 100 users, 100K requests) to
compare an Apache prefork and worker mpm. The test url is a simple hello
servlet on Tomcat 6.0.x via mod_jk. On my Sparc Solaris 10 server with only
the Apache set to worker mpm I see fo
