Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-04 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 3/3/13 1:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The decision was taken, therefore, to link the base file name and > context name as previously described. This removed nearly all of > the nasty edge cases, made for much simpler code and made the > over

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 19:44, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/03/2013 19:25, James Green wrote: > > I am clearly inferring too much. An explicit statement would certainly > help > > reduce confusion, and perhaps cause the Netbeans people to avoid putting > > the path attribute into the context element - pres

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/03/2013 19:25, James Green wrote: > On 3 March 2013 17:58, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote: >>> On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> >> The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the context path, the simplest so

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 17:58, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote: > > On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote: > > > > >> The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the > >> context path, the simplest solution is to change the base file name. > > > >

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote: > On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote: >> The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the >> context path, the simplest solution is to change the base file name. > > Fine. But this is not as described on this page: > http://t

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Eggers
On 3/3/2013 8:22 AM, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote: On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote: On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2013/3/3 James Green : So no

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote: > > On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote: > > > >> On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: > >>> On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko > >> wrote: > >>> > 2013/3/3 James Green : > >> > >>> So now I

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote: > On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: >>> On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko >> wrote: >>> 2013/3/3 James Green : >> >>> So now I have a war deployed. Easy enough. Now to set the URL path. >> T

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: > > On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko > wrote: > > > >> 2013/3/3 James Green : > > > So now I have a war deployed. Easy enough. Now to set the URL path. > There a > > lot of talk about Context Descriptors

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: > On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > >> 2013/3/3 James Green : >>> We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for >> tomcat deployment. >>> >>> If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2013/3/3 James Green : > > We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for > tomcat deployment. > > > > If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the > war filename. > > As expected, in any of 7.0

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2013/3/3 James Green : > We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for > tomcat deployment. > > If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the war > filename. As expected, in any of 7.0., 6.0 and even 5.5 . Have you read the docs (Context chapte