-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 3/3/13 1:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The decision was taken, therefore, to link the base file name and
> context name as previously described. This removed nearly all of
> the nasty edge cases, made for much simpler code and made the
> over
On 3 March 2013 19:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/03/2013 19:25, James Green wrote:
> > I am clearly inferring too much. An explicit statement would certainly
> help
> > reduce confusion, and perhaps cause the Netbeans people to avoid putting
> > the path attribute into the context element - pres
On 03/03/2013 19:25, James Green wrote:
> On 3 March 2013 17:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote:
>>> On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>
>>
The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the
context path, the simplest so
On 3 March 2013 17:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote:
> > On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
> >> The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the
> >> context path, the simplest solution is to change the base file name.
> >
> >
On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote:
> On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the
>> context path, the simplest solution is to change the base file name.
>
> Fine. But this is not as described on this page:
> http://t
On 3/3/2013 8:22 AM, James Green wrote:
On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote:
On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote:
On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
2013/3/3 James Green :
So no
On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote:
> > On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote:
> >>> On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> 2013/3/3 James Green :
> >>
> >>> So now I
On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote:
> On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote:
>>> On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko
>> wrote:
>>>
2013/3/3 James Green :
>>
>>> So now I have a war deployed. Easy enough. Now to set the URL path.
>> T
On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote:
> > On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
> >
> >> 2013/3/3 James Green :
>
> > So now I have a war deployed. Easy enough. Now to set the URL path.
> There a
> > lot of talk about Context Descriptors
On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote:
> On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>
>> 2013/3/3 James Green :
>>> We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for
>> tomcat deployment.
>>>
>>> If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the
On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2013/3/3 James Green :
> > We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for
> tomcat deployment.
> >
> > If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the
> war filename.
>
> As expected, in any of 7.0
2013/3/3 James Green :
> We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for
> tomcat deployment.
>
> If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the war
> filename.
As expected, in any of 7.0., 6.0 and even 5.5 .
Have you read the docs (Context chapte
12 matches
Mail list logo