On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 19:10 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Martin Spinassi schrieb:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:12 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >> remove this
> >>
> >> worker.maintain=30
> >> worker.worker1.connection_pool_size=1
> >>
> >>
> >> for now, and just accept the defaults
> >>
>
Martin Spinassi schrieb:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:12 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> remove this
>>
>> worker.maintain=30
>> worker.worker1.connection_pool_size=1
>>
>>
>> for now, and just accept the defaults
>>
>> Filip
>>
>
>
> Wow!! That just made the trick!
>
>
> Please, can you
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:12 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> remove this
>
> worker.maintain=30
> worker.worker1.connection_pool_size=1
>
>
> for now, and just accept the defaults
>
> Filip
>
Wow!! That just made the trick!
Please, can you explain me how those changes affects?
Th
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 19:56 +0100, André Warnier wrote:
> Martin Spinassi wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> >
> > I'm doing some performance tests under apache and tomcat using jakarta
> > connectors.
> >
> > Searching around, I've read about apache-worker (not jakarta), to make
> > it multi-process
remove this
worker.maintain=30
worker.worker1.connection_pool_size=1
for now, and just accept the defaults
Filip
Martin Spinassi wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm doing some performance tests under apache and tomcat using jakarta
connectors.
Searching around, I've read about apache-worker (not jaka
Martin Spinassi wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm doing some performance tests under apache and tomcat using jakarta
connectors.
Searching around, I've read about apache-worker (not jakarta), to make
it multi-process and multi-thread, but I'm having some troubles with
connectors now.
Here is the outpu