Hi Chris:
1. I am instrumenting inside the servlet code, looking
at Apache web server logs then at the Rich Internet
Application (RIA)
For a typcial request for my Portal from client to
servlet for example:
1. 4.55msec inside the RIA java code after the data
was read from the SOAP message.
2. 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Tony Anecito wrote:
> I heard that mod_jk was based off of ajp so I was
> quite surprised mod_jk was faster.
Yes, mod_jk does use the AJP protocol. Why were you surprised that it
was faster? With what are you comparing it?
- -chris
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Tony Anecito wrote:
> I am not sure if JBoss embedded Tomcat uses the native
> ajp but a great point. Do you know how to check for
> that?
Since JBoss uses Tomcat, it can use any of the standard connectors
available for it (basically HTTP(s) an
rlie
> >
> >
> > The significant problems we have cannot be solved
> at the same level
> > of thinking with which we created them. - Albert
> Einstein
> >
> > -Original Message- From: Tony Anecito
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,
> Septemb
el of
> thinking with which we created them.
> - Albert Einstein
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:56 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat
>
> I had heard th
day, September 28, 2007 12:56
PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat
I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from ajp to mod_jk
and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster for me.
-Tony
-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat
I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from
ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster
for me.
-Tony
--- Christopher Schul
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
personal preference in this order
mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp
I'm interested: why choose mod_proxy_http over mod_jk?
ease of configuration, no API nor configur
I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from
ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster
for me.
-Tony
--- Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Filip,
>
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> > personal preference in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> personal preference in this order
>
> mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp
I'm interested: why choose mod_proxy_http over mod_jk?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comme
RE: Apache connectors for tomcat
Not sure about the interface/protocol being depricated
since there was just a new release of mod_jk 1.2.25?
Also, someone put some effort into improvments into it
2.2.6 of Apache.
I also noticed a 10% performance improvement in
request response times using mod_jk w
Thanks for the clarification.
-Tony
--- "Caldarale, Charles R"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Apache connectors for tomcat
> >
> > Not sure about the interface/protocol being
> depricate
> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Apache connectors for tomcat
>
> Not sure about the interface/protocol being depricated
It's mod_jk2 that has been abandoned for over two years; mod_jk is still
in very active development. Any documentation or re
Not sure about the interface/protocol being depricated
since there was just a new release of mod_jk 1.2.25?
Also, someone put some effort into improvments into it
2.2.6 of Apache.
I also noticed a 10% performance improvement in
request response times using mod_jk which I was told
about and proven
You may find this link helpful.it works if your using the same
versions as the article. But I think JK2 has been 'deprecated'.
http://www.roktech.net/devblog/enclosures/iis6-Tomcat5-JK2.pdf
~Charlie
The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of
thinking with whic
personal preference in this order
mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp
rahul wrote:
Hi,
Which is the recommended connector for Apache now?
mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp (with balancer) ?
rahul
--
1. e4 _
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
