-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sanjeev,
On 4/25/2010 12:13 AM, Sanjeev Verma wrote:
> Some helpful info on this error here -
> http://www.java-forums.org/eclipse/312-exception_access_violation-0xc005.html
I find no helpful information on this page, unfortunately.
This error
Some helpful info on this error here -
http://www.java-forums.org/eclipse/312-exception_access_violation-0xc005.html
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 13:48 -0700, krawls35 wrote:
> Thank You for letting me know. How do I take it off and report to Tomcat
> forum? You are not being funny but very helpfu
Thank You for letting me know. How do I take it off and report to Tomcat
forum? You are not being funny but very helpful and I appreciate that.
awarnier wrote:
>
> Not trying to be funny here, but should you not be reporting this to Sun
> (as mentioned in the crash messages), rather than to th
Not trying to be funny here, but should you not be reporting this to Sun
(as mentioned in the crash messages), rather than to the Tomcat forum ?
krawls35 wrote:
I received an error also last night. I couldn't figure out how to do my own
post so I am hoping somebody will help me with my situatio
I received an error also last night. I couldn't figure out how to do my own
post so I am hoping somebody will help me with my situation also. Here it
go:
EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc005) at pc=0x6d8f9dac, pid=7016, tid=6844
#
# JRE version: 6.0_19-b04
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tsirkin,
On 9/5/2009 2:59 PM, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote:
> So,it could be this since this sparc/solaris.
> Anyway it seems i can't do anything about it.
I would ask your hardware vendor to replace either the memory or the
entire machine.
> Another questi
Ooo!
Thanks for the link!
It says:
Object-specific hardware error This is far less common, but it is
present in Solaris, when virtual memory pages have disappeared (e.g.
accessing an mmaped file which has been truncated.[1]
So,it could be this since this sparc/solaris.
Anyway it seems i can't
> It's possible. What is your architecture?
Solaris 9.Sparc.
> Do you have physical access? Can you run a memory tester on it?
>
Unfortunatly this is not possible.
Thanks
Evgeny
>
> - -chris
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla
2009/9/4 Christopher Schultz
> I've never seen one. The description of SIGBUS seems to indicate that
> it's pretty bad: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIGBUS (bad physical
> memory address, virtual memory pages have disappeared, etc.).
>
Or a misaligned physical memory access, which is a mere prog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tsirkin,
On 9/4/2009 5:12 AM, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote:
> Why SIGBUS is "Cool"?
I've never seen one. The description of SIGBUS seems to indicate that
it's pretty bad: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIGBUS (bad physical
memory address, virtual memory pages
Why SIGBUS is "Cool"?
What is strange is that running 32 bit java helped.
Of course i can explain it that the 32 have less address space and it does
not get
to the bad RAM ,but still ...
Evgeny
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 9/3/2009 6:06 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
> Have you got a creeping failure on your hardware? Bad RAM could cause the
> problem you observe, for example.
+1000
SIGBUS? Cool!
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Min
Well.Yes - the server have got loaded by apache server running on it.
So ,yes, that can be bad RAM.
I have changed the config to run the 32 version.
But maybe somebody here knows about any particular problems in Solaris/Java
that might help?
Evgeny
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Peter Crowther
wr
2009/9/3 Tsirkin Evgeny
> 2. this same app. works fine for 1/2 year + it works fine on another
> server.
>
Has your data changed? Does running the same app *with the same data* on
the other server trigger the error?
Have you got a creeping failure on your hardware? Bad RAM could cause the
pro
I don't think so:
1. Why would it break jvm?
2. this same app. works fine for 1/2 year + it works fine on another server.
Thanks
Evgeny
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 03.09.2009 11:42, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote:
> > environment :
> > Apache Tomcat/6.0.18
> > Solaris 9 64 bit
On 03.09.2009 11:42, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote:
> environment :
> Apache Tomcat/6.0.18
> Solaris 9 64 bit
> jdk1.6.0_13
>
> On one of the servers we are today getting constantly errors:
> An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime Environment.
> Here are some of those:
>
> -
16 matches
Mail list logo