Re: AJP Connector : question on mod_proxy_ajp

2015-04-01 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 01.04.2015 um 12:22 schrieb André Warnier: Rainer Jung wrote: Am 01.04.2015 um 09:43 schrieb André Warnier: Rainer Jung wrote: Am 31.03.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Christopher Schultz: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 3/31/15 3:41 PM, André Warnier wrote: I have a que

Re: AJP Connector : question on mod_proxy_ajp

2015-04-01 Thread André Warnier
Rainer Jung wrote: Am 01.04.2015 um 09:43 schrieb André Warnier: Rainer Jung wrote: Am 31.03.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Christopher Schultz: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 3/31/15 3:41 PM, André Warnier wrote: I have a question of my own. ??! +1 Tomcat 6.x/7.x/8.

Re: AJP Connector : question on mod_proxy_ajp

2015-04-01 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 01.04.2015 um 09:43 schrieb André Warnier: Rainer Jung wrote: Am 31.03.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Christopher Schultz: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 3/31/15 3:41 PM, André Warnier wrote: I have a question of my own. ??! +1 Tomcat 6.x/7.x/8.x. Until now, we ha

Re: AJP Connector : question on mod_proxy_ajp

2015-04-01 Thread André Warnier
Rainer Jung wrote: Am 31.03.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Christopher Schultz: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 3/31/15 3:41 PM, André Warnier wrote: I have a question of my own. ??! +1 Tomcat 6.x/7.x/8.x. Until now, we have been using mostly the Apache httpd mod_jk co

Re: AJP Connector : question on mod_proxy_ajp

2015-03-31 Thread Andy Wang
On 03/31/2015 04:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 31.03.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Christopher Schultz: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 3/31/15 3:41 PM, André Warnier wrote: I have a question of my own. ??! +1 Tomcat 6.x/7.x/8.x. Until now, we have been using mostly th

Re: AJP Connector : question on mod_proxy_ajp

2015-03-31 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 31.03.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Christopher Schultz: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 3/31/15 3:41 PM, André Warnier wrote: I have a question of my own. ??! +1 Tomcat 6.x/7.x/8.x. Until now, we have been using mostly the Apache httpd mod_jk connector to Tomcat. A

Re: AJP Connector : question on mod_proxy_ajp

2015-03-31 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 3/31/15 3:41 PM, André Warnier wrote: > I have a question of my own. ??! > Tomcat 6.x/7.x/8.x. > > Until now, we have been using mostly the Apache httpd mod_jk > connector to Tomcat. And we have been using the Tomcat AJP > Connector's '

Re: AJP connector question

2008-04-09 Thread Rainer Jung
darinpope schrieb: It's an (un)documented attribute called "packetSize" for the AJP connector: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44541 The packetSize attribute is only good for 5.5.20+ and 6.0.2+. However, I'm having issues with this myself. I've set my max_packet_size in the

Re: AJP connector question

2008-04-09 Thread darinpope
Tomcat 5.5.25 mod_jk 1.2.25 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AJP-connector-question-tp16587397p16592150.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail:

Re: AJP connector question

2008-04-09 Thread Rainer Jung
darinpope schrieb: It's an (un)documented attribute called "packetSize" for the AJP connector: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44541 The packetSize attribute is only good for 5.5.20+ and 6.0.2+. However, I'm having issues with this myself. I've set my max_packet_size in the

Re: AJP connector question

2008-04-09 Thread darinpope
It's an (un)documented attribute called "packetSize" for the AJP connector: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44541 The packetSize attribute is only good for 5.5.20+ and 6.0.2+. However, I'm having issues with this myself. I've set my max_packet_size in the worker and the packe