OK Thanks Mark！
tong__...@163.com
From: Mark Thomas
Date: 2018-01-23 20:02
To: users
Subject: Re: A question about The Relationship between Http Session and
WebSocket Session
On 23/01/18 10:35, tong__hui wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm a J2EE Programmer use Tomcat deploy my webapplication.
On 23/01/18 10:35, tong__hui wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm a J2EE Programmer use Tomcat deploy my webapplication.
> I have a question about the relationship between Http Session and WebSocket
> Session in tomcat.
> Is Http Session contains WebSocket Session? or they are seperate.
They are completely se
On 24/08/17 21:39, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
> On 8/23/17 4:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 23/08/17 21:17, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Max threads >= current thread count Current thread count >=
>>> current thread busy Current thread count >= Keeped alive sockets
>>> count
>
>> Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 8/23/17 4:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/08/17 21:17, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> To whom it may concern,
>>
>> On 8/22/17 10:28 PM, ophusky wrote:
>>> Server version: Apache Tomcat/8.0.35 Server built: May 11
>>> 2016 21:57:08 UTC
On 23/08/17 21:17, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> To whom it may concern,
>
> On 8/22/17 10:28 PM, ophusky wrote:
>> Server version: Apache Tomcat/8.0.35 Server built: May 11 2016
>> 21:57:08 UTC Server number: 8.0.35.0 OS Name:Linux OS
>> Version: 3.2.35 Architecture: amd64 JVM Ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
To whom it may concern,
On 8/22/17 10:28 PM, ophusky wrote:
> Server version: Apache Tomcat/8.0.35 Server built: May 11 2016
> 21:57:08 UTC Server number: 8.0.35.0 OS Name:Linux OS
> Version: 3.2.35 Architecture: amd64 JVM Version:
Fifgfdyfyi
Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.
Message d'origine
De: 王琳
Envoyé: vendredi 9 juin 2017 01:37
À: users@tomcat.apache.org
Répondre à: Tomcat Users List
Objet: Re: A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
Fictdyhcu
Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.
Message d'origine
De: 王琳
Envoyé: vendredi 9 juin 2017 01:37
À: users@tomcat.apache.org
Répondre à: Tomcat Users List
Objet: Re: A question about websocket API-- Annotation ServerEndpoint
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/A-question-about-websocket-API-Annotation-ServerEndpoint-tp5064163p5064200.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To uns
On 08/06/17 02:06, 王琳 wrote:
> Hi friend:
> i have a question. use Tomcat 8.5.15
> @ServerEndpoint API has 'value' summary. This value mapping url.When the url
> has parameter,use {}.
> for example:
> @ServerEndpoint(value =
> "/websocket/fmsWebsocket/{userId}/{companyId}/{groupId}")
>
> js:var
validateUri="false"/>
>
> Everything is all right,thanks again!
I'd highly recommend removing the URL rewriting if possible. Either
remove the leading /tomcat from your URI space on the proxy or re-name
your application's WAR (or exploded WAR directory) to
tomcat#sa
发送时间：2017-06-01 15:50
主题：Re: a question about Realm config
收件人："Tomcat Users List"
抄送：
This time to the list...
On 01/06/17 08:02, ophusky wrote:
> Tomcat version:8.0.43.0
> Nginx version:openresty/1.11.2.2
> OS:CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)
>
> I have al
This time to the list...
On 01/06/17 08:02, ophusky wrote:
> Tomcat version:8.0.43.0
> Nginx version:openresty/1.11.2.2
> OS:CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)
>
> I have already configure tomcat to use the DIGEST certification,
> When I have direct access to Tomcat all normal,
> http://192.1
Isn't there any workaround to this situation? In my application, a
database update operation depends on whether the message was delivered
to the client or not, so in that scenario, I would never know if the
message was delivered. And even if onError() is called later, I can
never know which message
On 12/05/2016 08:24, Tejas Nandanikar wrote:
> Thank you for your quick reply.
> So consider a case where client abruptly loses internet connection.
> In that scenario, the sendText() would return normally as the server
> hasn't received 'close' packet from the client, did I get it right?
Assuming
Thank you for your quick reply.
So consider a case where client abruptly loses internet connection.
In that scenario, the sendText() would return normally as the server
hasn't received 'close' packet from the client, did I get it right?
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12
On 12/05/2016 06:16, Tejas Nandanikar wrote:
> I am using Apache Tomcat 8.0.33.
> I was going through Java documentation about RemoteEndpoint.Basic
> which says that sendText(String text) blocks until all of the message
> has been transmitted.
> But I noticed that when the client loses internet con
2012/9/7 Mark Thomas :
>
>> How about Apache Tomcat 6.x.x? When is the end for the support?
>
> No plans at the current time. Best guess is that it is at least two years
> away. There will be at least 12 months notice of eol.
>
> The biggest driver is the J2EE specification process. A new specific
Wei Chen wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Recently I read from http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-55-eol.html that
>Apache Tomcat team will end their support for Apache Tomcat 5.5.x will
>end on 30 September 2012. I wonder if there any timeline for the
>lifecycle for Apache Tomcat?
No.
> How about Apache Tomcat
charles didonato wrote:
>I have 2 instances of Tomcat 7.0 on the same host with two manager apps
>(different ports) and two AJP connectors On different ports. Apache 2.4 is
>providing the load balancing and
>when I stop one instance of Tomcat, it fails over To the other instance. My
>questi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/11/2011 3:11 AM, chateau Xiao wrote:
> for the necessary of debug. I need the thread dump information like below to
> show me the threads running status.
>
> [snip]
>
> I usually use kill -3 or jstack to satisify my requirement. when
> things
>Thanks for the info. I though you opened a buzilla issue? Would you mind
pasting this into the issue as a new comment? Once we agree, that
something looks like a bug and an issue is opened, it's best to collct
further info there.
Yes, I opened a buzilla issue. It's called "Problem with mod_jk 1
On 20.11.2009 09:03, thomas2004 wrote:
>
>> Scroll back to Rainer's message dated 17/11/2009.
> There is a question there. The answer to that question is what Rainer
> is waiting for.
>
>
> Ok, here again Rainer's question:
>
>
>> I know, that you have seen a problem, the errno=11 thing. I n
>Scroll back to Rainer's message dated 17/11/2009.
There is a question there. The answer to that question is what Rainer
is waiting for.
Ok, here again Rainer's question:
> I know, that you have seen a problem, the errno=11 thing. I need to
> know, whether *this* problem (errno=11, which is
thomas2004 wrote:
Rainer is asking you a question, here. If you can work with him, I'm
sure he'll be able to diagnose and possibly solve your problem.
Sorry for my misunderstanding Rainer's question. I can surely work with him.
Just tell me how and in which way. I will try my best.
Scroll b
>Rainer is asking you a question, here. If you can work with him, I'm
sure he'll be able to diagnose and possibly solve your problem.
Sorry for my misunderstanding Rainer's question. I can surely work with him.
Just tell me how and in which way. I will try my best.
--
View this message in co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
On 11/18/2009 2:26 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
>> I know, that you have seen a problem, the errno=11 thing. I need to
>> know, whether *this* problem (errno=11, which is your original PDF
>> generation problem) also happens, when no socket-timeout a
>I know, that you have seen a problem, the errno=11 thing. I need to
know, whether *this* problem (errno=11, which is your original PDF
generation problem) also happens, when no socket-timeout and no
reply_timeout is set.
Your reproduction attempt using a simple html snippet did *not* show a
mod_
Hello Thomas,
On 17.11.2009 11:05, thomas2004 wrote:
>
>> I think the reproduction with html is not working because of some other
> reasons likely not related with mod_jk. In the original message he has a
> jk error message referring to errno 11=EAGAIN. There is a change between
> 1.2.26 and 1.2.
>I think the reproduction with html is not working because of some other
reasons likely not related with mod_jk. In the original message he has a
jk error message referring to errno 11=EAGAIN. There is a change between
1.2.26 and 1.2.28 related to how EAGAIN gets handled while waiting for
data. So
Sorry for the late reply. I was not in office yesterday.
>Are you saying that the web browser does not show anything? I'd be
interested in seeing what the browser is receiving, because that HTML is
pretty ugly (i.e. not well-formed).
What I mean is: The browser is waiting for the returned page w
On 13.11.2009 15:49, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> On 11/13/2009 2:55 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
>> Sorry, the return page this time should just contains simply text, somewhat
>> like "Generated in 0 msec[query time: 22186 msec, processing time: 20
>> msec] for 36 contracts. ", not a PDF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
On 11/13/2009 2:55 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
> Sorry, the return page this time should just contains simply text, somewhat
> like "Generated in 0 msec[query time: 22186 msec, processing time: 20
> msec] for 36 contracts. ", not a PDF-stream si
> So now, maybe you want to state your real problem again, and please send
us some information that is really related to that problem.
And, so far, and judging by the log that you did send, but where you
also mention that nothing shows up in the browser, it does not look like
either a tomcat o
thomas2004 wrote:
I cannot tell you what's wrong, but I can tell you that the log you show
below, shows that the JBoss response is a HTML document, not a PDF.
So maybe you have to revise some of your assumptions.
Sorry, you are right. This time I haven't test the PDF generation since I
just w
>I cannot tell you what's wrong, but I can tell you that the log you show
below, shows that the JBoss response is a HTML document, not a PDF.
So maybe you have to revise some of your assumptions.
Sorry, you are right. This time I haven't test the PDF generation since I
just want to test the sim
>The Content-Type is text/html. What does the content actually look like?
Is it an error message or something?
If the browser is showing nothing, you may want to use an HTTP protocol
sniffer to see what the content is (although mod_jk appears to be
dumping the full data into the log file, so you
thomas2004 wrote:
log-message in mod_jk.log Continue:
But it's still a HTML response, not a PDF.
[code]
[Thu Nov 12 16:08:15 2009] [9280:2537062720] [debug]
wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker_portfolio_son1
[Thu Nov 12 16:08:15 2009] [9280:2537062720] [debug]
ajp_reset
thomas2004 wrote:
...
I cannot tell you what's wrong, but I can tell you that the log you show
below, shows that the JBoss response is a HTML document, not a PDF.
So maybe you have to revise some of your assumptions.
...
00 00 FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 - 0...
[Thu Nov 12 15:50
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
On 11/12/2009 10:12 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
> I issue a request from the client (browser) to the to generate the report.
> On Jboss-log I can watch as follow:
>
> 2009-11-12 15:50:24,094 INFO [STDOUT] - 1. Get data -
> 2009-11-12 15:56
log-message in mod_jk.log Continue:
[code]
[Thu Nov 12 16:08:15 2009] [9280:2537062720] [debug]
wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker_portfolio_son1
[Thu Nov 12 16:08:15 2009] [9280:2537062720] [debug]
ajp_reset_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (743): (worker_portfolio_son1) resettin
I change the workers.properties now as follow to make the things simple:
worker.worker_portfolio_son1.connection_pool_timeout=600
worker.worker_portfolio_son1.socket_keepalive=True
worker.worker_portfolio_son1.lbfactor=1
worker.worker_portfolio_son1.type=ajp13
worker.worker_portfolio_son1.port=80
> From: thomas2004 [mailto:thomas200...@yahoo.de]
> Subject: Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration
>
> Where is 'Bugzilla'?
Try the link from the Tomcat home page, cleverly hidden under the name "Bug
Database".
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTA
> Thomas can open an issue in Bugzilla, which helps us not forgetting it.
> Topic: "Socker read returns EAGAIN during long wait".
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
>
Where is 'Bugzilla'?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp2626406
On 11.11.2009 22:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> On 11/11/2009 9:45 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
>
>>> 20-40 minutes is an unreasonable amount of time to wait for an HTTP request
>> to complete. I recommend changing your architecture so that HTTP requests
>> don't have to take so long.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
On 11/11/2009 9:45 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
>
>> 20-40 minutes is an unreasonable amount of time to wait for an HTTP request
> to complete. I recommend changing your architecture so that HTTP requests
> don't have to take so long.
>
> Surely is
> Without socket_timeout the log message looks as follow:
[code]
[Wed Nov 11 14:25:13 2009] [1976:2537062720] [info]
ajp_handle_cping_cpong::jk_ajp_common.c
Please ignog my post. The log message is wrong.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-c
>20-40 minutes is an unreasonable amount of time to wait for an HTTP request
to complete. I recommend changing your architecture so that HTTP requests
don't have to take so long.
Surely is a good idea. But the situation is we just host the application for
our customer who will do not want to chan
> Is the log message the same when running without socket_timeout?
Without socket_timeout the log message looks as follow:
[code]
[Wed Nov 11 14:25:13 2009] [1976:2537062720] [info]
ajp_handle_cping_cpong::jk_ajp_common.c (865): timeout in reply cpong
[Wed Nov 11 14:25:15 2009] [1976:2537062720]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 11/10/2009 11:26 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> It's possible, that this would work as a workaround. The usual "let some
> bits dripple to keep the connection active" strategy.
Ugh. Why not have the request fire-off a report-generation thread th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
On 11/10/2009 2:53 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
>> Just to confirm: you have a single request that takes 20-40 minutes to
>> fulfill? Or do you issue a request to generate the report and then,
>> later, issue a request to retrieve the (already-genera
On 10.11.2009 17:12, André Warnier wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote:
Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped.
>>> I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it
>>> doesn't help.
>>
> ...
> Hi.
> Just my To
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote:
Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped.
I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it
doesn't help.
...
Hi.
Just my Tomcat- and Java-dummy look on this.
As I understand the basic i
On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote:
>
>> Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped.
>
> I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it
> doesn't help.
> My workersproperties looks now as follow:
>
> [code]
> worker.worker_portfolio_son1.conne
>Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped.
I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it
doesn't help.
My workersproperties looks now as follow:
[code]
worker.worker_portfolio_son1.connection_pool_timeout=600
worker.worker_portfolio_son1.socke
On 09.11.2009 11:27, thomas2004 wrote:
>
> I newly installed the mod_jk 1.2.28 and since then got problem (see below).
>
> **
> We have a web application deployed on Jboss (RH Linux OS). The access to the
> web application is via a Apache Httpd Web Server. One of the function
Hi,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>Just to confirm: you have a single request that takes 20-40 minutes to
>fulfill? Or do you issue a request to generate the report and then,
>later, issue a request to retrieve the (already-generated) report?
I issue a request to generate the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
On 11/9/2009 5:27 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
> We have a web application deployed on Jboss (RH Linux OS). The access to the
> web application is via a Apache Httpd Web Server. One of the function of
> this web application is one can online generate
I suspect some conspiracy is going on: just bought a book during
ApacheCon US and on the flyleaf with citations it contains:
"To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail" (Mark Twain)
...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users
Elli Albek wrote:
How did this make it into the tomcat users list? :)
CPAN: Driven by users. Java (JCP) Driven by vendors.
Tomcat logging: driven by Java Hammer (tm) manufacturers.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...
How did this make it into the tomcat users list? :)
CPAN: Driven by users. Java (JCP) Driven by vendors.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 10/31/2009 9:53 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Fortunately, this is not about to happen to java programmers.
Zing!
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 10/31/2009 4:59 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> I know, someone is going to say that one shouldn't
> mess around in a nuclear power plant if one hasn't read the manual.
Oddly enough, Sun's Java source (that is, the source code to the .java
files
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
They are saying: In the time java developers picks the gun, the php
developer runs away with the prey. And the c developer seems to be
thinking about best fitting boots.
The perl developer in t
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Leon Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>> They are saying: In the time java developers picks the gun, the php
>> developer runs away with the prey. And the c developer seems to be
>> thinking about best fitting boots.
>>
> The perl developer in the meanti
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
They are saying: In the time java developers picks the gun, the php
developer runs away with the prey. And the c developer seems to be
thinking about best fitting boots.
The perl developer in the meantime created a module which will allow him
to catch the rest of the spec
David kerber wrote:
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 10/30/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-
rotationon
> -Original Message-
> From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 1:53 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-
> rotation on "catalina.out")
>
&g
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>> Java is for big boys only, isn't it?
>
> I've heard that recent (even several years old, now) versions of Java
> VMs can "match" the speed of compiled C++ for many non-trivial uses.
> But, can the Java compiler use its generics feature
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 10/30/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-
rotationon "catalin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 10/30/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-
>> rotationon "catalina.out&
> From: Robert Koberg [mailto:r...@koberg.com]
> Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-
> rotationon "catalina.out")
>
> I have been trying to pound in a nail with java. I have tried
> everything and the damn nail just won't go in.
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-
rotationon "catalina.out")
Here's one Java can't do (without significant help):
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: [OT] Hammers and nails (was Re: A question about log-
> rotationon "catalina.out")
>
> Here's one Java can't do (without significant help):
>
> Write a command-line (no GUI)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre,
On 10/30/2009 9:21 AM, Pierre Goupil wrote:
> I'm a true Java developper (tm). If a problem can't be solved with Java,
> that's not a real problem.
Here's one Java can't do (without significant help):
Write a command-line (no GUI) app that p
I'm a true Java developper (tm). If a problem can't be solved with Java,
that's not a real problem. Java is for big boys only, isn't it?
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:12 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Peter Crowther wrote:
>
>>
>> At the other end of the language-complexity scale, I can't remember
>> t
Peter Crowther wrote:
At the other end of the language-complexity scale, I can't remember
the source of the quote but I do appreciate "When C++ is your hammer,
everything looks like a screw."
I don't know what you people are all talking about. We Perl programmers
don't have such issues. It do
2009/10/30 Caldarale, Charles R :
> Smalltalk is a classic example of the philosophy: "I have a hammer, therefore
> everything is a nail."
I used to teach Smalltalk*. Of a 3-day course, 1/4 day was on the
language, 1/2 day was on the environment and the rest was on the class
library. It's an in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 10/29/2009 6:47 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> 4) If it works, this has got to go on the WiKi
I apologize for possibly sounding like a jerk, but my suggestion seemed
somewhat self-evident given the various configuration options.
> Christopher
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Subject: Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out"
>
> Two times in one day:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-
> docs/200910.mbox/raw/%3c20091029112545.gz5...@cr%3e/
>
> con
On 30.10.2009 01:35, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
>> [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther
>> Subject: Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out"
>>
>> ... you've not played w
> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
> [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther
> Subject: Re: A question about log-rotation on "catalina.out"
>
> ... you've not played with Smalltalk, have you? :-) Arithmetic isn't
> built int
2009/10/29 André Warnier :
> (*) Actually, it's not the Java language itself, which is quite simple and
> elegant. But it's that in order to do anything at all in that language, you
> first need to become familiar with dozens of class hierarchies.
... you've not played with Smalltalk, have you? :
Christopher,
1) :-)
2) I'll definitely try it. It looks like it's worth the effort (and as
a reward for yours).
3) I have a question in the text below
4) If it works, this has got to go on the WiKi
Christopher Schultz wrote:
I think you can get this effect by:
1. Setting
Q : are the abov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 10/29/2009 2:38 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>> [Cue Andre's rant about logging configuration in Tomcat 5+]
>>
> Yes, I want a new
>logpath="mychoice" prefix="mychoicetoo" suffix="mychoicealso"
> rotate="mycho
Christopher Schultz wrote:
[Cue Andre's rant about logging configuration in Tomcat 5+]
Yes, I want a new
logpath="mychoice" prefix="mychoicetoo" suffix="mychoicealso"
rotate="mychoiceagain" />
that will suck in all the logs that these undisciplined application
developers dream up and direc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
(Looks like my first attempt got botched. Here it is, again.)
On 10/29/2009 5:17 AM, thomas2004 wrote:
> > I've installed Tomcat 5.5.27 on Linux. Though the "catalina.out" will be
> > rotated e
binuQvzTFsbws.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
What do you mean "send stdout and stderr to logger(1) instead"?
How to do it?
Harald Dunkel-3 wrote:
>
> thomas2004 wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have now a problem/question:
>>
>> I've installed Tomcat 5.5.27 on Linux. Though the "catalina.out" will be
>> rotated everyday, i.g. "catalina.
thomas2004 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have now a problem/question:
>
> I've installed Tomcat 5.5.27 on Linux. Though the "catalina.out" will be
> rotated everyday, i.g. "catalina.-mm-dd.log. But the "catalina.out"-self
> doesn't begin from the new day but still contains the old log messages. I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anand,
On 3/3/2009 6:59 AM, Anand HS wrote:
> However, I understand that the URL rewrite mechanism ends up losing any
> parameters when a HTTP POST request is sent to my domain resource.
If you're issuing a /redirect/, you'll need to use the 307 resp
Tim Funk wrote:
> I have not used it before.
>
> I can't imagine why it would not preserve POST requests.
OP's probably confusing redirect with forward.
Gotcha to look out for: you'll need to set the Host you're using to be
the default Host in the Engine, or *.domain.com requests will go to the
I have not used it before.
I can't imagine why it would not preserve POST requests.
-Tim
Anand HS wrote:
Thanks Andre and Tim for the quick response.
I do not have an apache server right now. So URL Rewrite tool seems like a
good solution.
However, I understand that the URL rewrite mechanism e
Thanks Andre and Tim for the quick response.
I do not have an apache server right now. So URL Rewrite tool seems like a
good solution.
However, I understand that the URL rewrite mechanism ends up losing any
parameters when a HTTP POST request is sent to my domain resource.
While I am right now down
Tim Funk wrote:
Doable : Yes
Out of the Box: No
You can write a Servlet filter to examine the incoming hostname and
forward the request with the username prefix. In fact - you might need
to write it : UrlRewriteFilter - http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/ might
do it for you.
+1
In Tomcat and
Doable : Yes
Out of the Box: No
You can write a Servlet filter to examine the incoming hostname and
forward the request with the username prefix. In fact - you might need
to write it : UrlRewriteFilter - http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/ might
do it for you.
-Tim
Anand HS wrote:
Hi,
I have a
I think I was doing a mistake in the url-pattern. giving the correct URL
pattern did the trick.
Thanks for the tip on transport-guarantee Chuck.
Thanks,
Anand
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Anand HS wrote:
> Hi, Thanks for the info about the transport-guarantee.
> I did try to use it. Here i
Hi, Thanks for the info about the transport-guarantee.
I did try to use it. Here is the config to exclude xsl files and allow all
others through to HTTPS.
Notify page, accessed internally by
application
*.xsl
NONE
Entire Site
/*
CONFIDENTIAL
I would expect with this configuration th
> From: Anand HS [mailto:anan...@gmail.com]
> Subject: A question about excluding URL patterns from filters
>
> I have a filter that takes all requests that try to hit http and
> redirects them through https.
Why are you using a filter? Why not the mechanism
defined in the servlet spec?
- Chu
On Feb 6, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Anand HS wrote:
However, I believe there must be a more 'elegant' way to exclude a url
pattern through configuration than adding/modifying more code. :)
Could you shed more ideas on this. ?
Move it?
---
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
