PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>>>>
>>>> it seems possi
n.
A-
On 10/31/08 10:56 AM, "Petr Sumbera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>
>>> From: Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>>>
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>>
>> it seems possible to run Tomcat on a non-privileged port with a
>> non-root account and have re
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a good point.
>
> What is your preferred method of running Tomcat? JSVC? Startup / shutdown
> scripts? Front-end with Apache HTTP server? Standalone?
standalone with start/shutdown scripts as non
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>>
>> it seems possible to run Tomcat on a non-privileged port with a
>> non-root account and have requests for port 443 redirected to
>> Tomcat's listening port.
>
> Of co
> From: Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>
> it seems possible to run Tomcat on a non-privileged port with a
> non-root account and have requests for port 443 redirected to
> Tomcat's listening
d use JSVC. I haven't
done this yet, which is why I started the "JSVC vs startup / shutdown
scripts" thread.
Would love your $0.02,
A-
On 10/30/08 1:56 PM, "Caldarale, Charles R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> From: Petr Sumbera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From: Petr Sumbera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>
> Btw I don't see any benefit using jsvc. Is somebody using it? Why?
Judging from the comments on this list, many people are using it. The primary
reason is to avoid runni
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
>
> Commons collections seems to be a relict and not really used.
> DBCP and pool is contained in tomcat-dbcp.jar. We ranem the packages in
> order to make to dbcp and pool classes independant of any webapp bundled
> dbcp or pool versions.
>
And how about commons-daemon.ja
PetrS schrieb:
>
> Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
> And what about Eclipse JDT Runtime Binary? Are these also renamed into
> jasper-jdt.jar? The same reason?
Here it's slightly different: The jar file used to include JDT is named
non-standard, but the classes contained in it still have the original
org.ecl
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
>
> Commons collections seems to be a relict and not really used.
> DBCP and pool is contained in tomcat-dbcp.jar. We ranem the packages in
> order to make to dbcp and pool classes independant of any webapp bundled
> dbcp or pool versions.
>
And what about Eclipse JDT Runt
Petr Sumbera schrieb:
> Hi Tomcat gurus,
>
> The question I have is rather philosophical and not really technical
> (I'm evaluating Tomcat 6 integration into OpenSolaris).
>
> While compiling Tomcat 6.0.16 it requires:
>
> Apache Commons Daemon
> Apache Commons Collections
> Apache Commons DBCP
12 matches
Mail list logo
