On 3/22/06, Chris Fong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have gotten request to separate traffic to multiple ports so that
> Network Engineer can manage/debug network traffic easier (by port). I
> totally agree this will make troubleshooting easier, but I am also
> afraid there is performance cost in
> To the Chris, I personally don't think it is the norm since your
average
> site usually don't get that kind of load. I would start with 2 or 3
and
> scale up as needed.
I have gotten request to separate traffic to multiple ports so that
Network Engineer can manage/debug network traffic easier (b
ance be affected by a lot.
Thanks,
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:52 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: overheads on multiple connectors
>
> : From: "David Rees" <[EMAIL P
: From: "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
: On 3/21/06, Chris Fong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Let me rephrase original my question.
: >
: > Is it an abnormal configuration to have roughly 20 connectors all
: > listening on different ports for 5.5.15? Have anyone had similar
: > configuration
On 3/21/06, Chris Fong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me rephrase original my question.
>
> Is it an abnormal configuration to have roughly 20 connectors all
> listening on different ports for 5.5.15? Have anyone had similar
> configuration for their production environment with heavy traffic?
Y
Let me rephrase original my question.
Is it an abnormal configuration to have roughly 20 connectors all
listening on different ports for 5.5.15? Have anyone had similar
configuration for their production environment with heavy traffic?
Thanks,
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris
