RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-10 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
from our secure web server. Has anyone successfully configured Tomcat->IIS that is using a secure web server? -Original Message- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 6:30 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL Hansel, Jaso

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-09 Thread André Warnier
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: Chuck, I was able to get everything working on my end. There is a *significant* performance decrease when running my application through IIS and Tomcat using the isapi_redirect.dll, as opposed to port 8080. No way to know what you mean by

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-09 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:50 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST ap

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-09 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
Seems as though the application is not even being seen as a valid URL when trying to hit on port 8009, eventhough it's listening. -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 2:39 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Rainer Jung
06, 2010 11:50 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO!!! There was one regression in

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
Cool, thanks Chuck. I need to provide justification to the powers that be. -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 12:19 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > From: Hansel, Jason T

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > Besides the latest version, is there one that you recommend? Not really. Many other fixes are in 6.0.28; whether or not the one regressio

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
I sense sarcasm in your voice. -Original Message- From: Pid * [mailto:p...@pidster.com] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 12:04 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL On 6 Aug 2010, at 16:56, "Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00" wrote

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Pid *
Message- > From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:50 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > >> From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 >> [mailto:jason.t.hansel....@na

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
Chuck, Besides the latest version, is there one that you recommend? -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:50 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > From: Hansel, Jason T

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Propes, Barry L
Alright! -Original Message- From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 10:45 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO!!! There was one regression in 6.0.28 that you should be aware of: https://issues.apac

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO!!! -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:40 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLAN

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Propes, Barry L
6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > Well I'd like to but 6.0.18 is the most recent version approved on our > network. You might want the powers that

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > Well I'd like to but 6.0.18 is the most recent version > approved on our network. You might want the powers that be to review t

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > I am going to install version 6.0.18 Much better to use 6.0.29 - stay current. &g

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > I am going to install version 6.0.18 Much better to use 6.0.29 - stay current. > are there "preferred" versions of JVM

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
2010 11:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > Would it be better to install the 32-bit if our IIS is running

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > Would it be better to install the 32-bit if our IIS > is running as 32-bit? Other than the optional APR connector and service wrapp

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-06 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
I did this with the isapi_redirect.dll -Original Message- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: > Charles, > I was j

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread André Warnier
Maybe to avoid further meandering in what should or should not work, here is a short tutorial of how all this stuff works. At the end of the chain, you have a Tomcat Engine. This engine processes HTTP requests which it receives in some internal Tomcat format. The requests are processed by fo

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread André Warnier
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: Charles, I was just putting that protocol in there to prevent the 8080 from being hit, I've actually commented it out. I got this server.xml file from the install (Note:that not everything is on here). I can load my webapp now, but the page

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
t.dll (which I was referring to below as the redirect file...sorry my in head language) -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:45 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > From

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 10:31 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL See inline On 05.08.2010 15:15, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: > Rainer, > Thanks again for being patient with me

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 > [mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > I created a folder within the Tomcat 6.0 directory called > 'connector'. That is where all of my redirect files are >

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:44 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: > Tomcat is not listening on Port 8009 using the AJP/1.3 protocol. > I can change t

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread André Warnier
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: Tomcat is not listening on Port 8009 using the AJP/1.3 protocol. I can change this line of code (just did it as a test) to reference port 8009 and I can see it's listening, however this Is not the protocol I am wanting. co

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
Websites in IIS with a Green Arrow. I used the 32-bit because we are running 32-bit as 64-bit. Seems that this connector is not even being read: -Original Message- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 10:35 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread André Warnier
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: Rainer, Thanks again for being patient with me. I've seen some different behavior this morning. When I am trying to access my page, I get "Service Temporary Unavailable", which is better than what I was receiving. Yes, that looks good, fro

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread Rainer Jung
See inline On 05.08.2010 15:15, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: Rainer, Thanks again for being patient with me. I've seen some different behavior this morning. When I am trying to access my page, I get "Service Temporary Unavailable", which is better than what I was recei

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (757): (worker1) resetting endpoint with sd = 4294967295 (socket shutdown) [Thu Aug 05 09:12:52.389 2010] [10216:8452] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (3010): recycling connection pool slot=0 for worker worker1 -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@k

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-05 Thread Rainer Jung
ta.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 4:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL On 04.08.2010 21:50, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: I did read your post and I changed the Port Number. " This connector should be used depending on your

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-04 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
ker named "ajp13", not "worker1". Regards, Rainer > -Original Message- > From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 3:40 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL > > On 04.08

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-04 Thread Rainer Jung
inal Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 3:40 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL On 04.08.2010 20:58, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: Jung, I'm still getting the errors. Why shouldn

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-04 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
Here is my uriworkermap.properties: /geoportal|/*=worker1 -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 3:40 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL On 04.08.2010 20:58, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCE

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-04 Thread Rainer Jung
tication problems might show up after you solved your worker configuration problem. Until now your IIS doesn't even talk to Tomcat. Regards, Rainer -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 1:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List

RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-04 Thread Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
Jung, I'm still getting the errors. -Is this where my actual authentication is taking place? -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 1:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18

Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL

2010-08-04 Thread Rainer Jung
On 04.08.2010 18:07, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote: I am trying to get Tomcat and IIS configured on my secure web server (SSL) so that I can access my deployed web application via https and NOT over http. Connection to non-SSL works, but I cannot have that connection du