> From: lightbulb432 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Specify context path when context.xml is in META-INF
>
> Based on what I've read, I've learned that the least ideal
> approach is to place the context information in server.xml.
Correct; doing so requires a
Based on what I've read, I've learned that the least ideal approach is to
place the context information in server.xml.
What I don't know, though, is how the remaining options stack up to each
other. What are the tradeoffs (apart from the path naming issue) of placing
context.xml in META-INF versu
> From: lightbulb432 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Specify context path when context.xml is in META-INF
>
> Is there a way, when you have your context.xml in META-INF rather than
> specifying the Context element in server.xml or elsewhere, to
> customize the context path?
No - the path i