RE: Re: Re: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-23 Thread cknell
is what's needed. -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:36:49 -0700 To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: Re: Re: Re: BOOBIES! Golly, Charles, Maybe you need some train

Re: Re: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
Golly, Charles, Maybe you need some training? Maybe you are the one who does not get the point? If you think I am going to apologize for your taking a serious topic that hurts people and covering it with your inane indifference, you might be wrong. The worst people are not the haters, although

Re: Re: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
Gosh, Wally. Maybe I did. On 7/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Gee, Jack. Maybe you didn't follow the link and simply assumed what was on the other end. -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

RE: Re: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-22 Thread cknell
Thank you. I was caught up in a witch hunt and feel undeservedly bashed over my attempt to inject some light-hearted jest into an overheated atmosphere. Plainly the poster who calls him or herself "Dakota Jack" didn't view the link. He or she had already made up his or her mind and couldn't be

RE: Re: Re: BOOBIES!

2006-07-22 Thread cknell
Gee, Jack. Maybe you didn't follow the link and simply assumed what was on the other end. -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:45:35 -0700 To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: Re: Re: B