HI Christopher, not sure we are on the same page. The problem I encountered
was that a Spring 6 war app with pg driver(42.3.1) could not deploy on
Tomcat 10, but worked well when downupgraded to Spring 5/Tomcat 9. But on
the jetty 11 and WildFly preview 26, Spring 6/pg war package are also
working
Hantsy,
On 1/5/22 23:31, hantsy bai wrote:
I finally resolved this issue. Exclude the pg driver from war, and copy it
to tomcat/lib, it works.
I remember in the past years, I preferred tomcat for Java Web applications
because I did not need to register a Jdbc driver but it is tedious work in
I finally resolved this issue. Exclude the pg driver from war, and copy it
to tomcat/lib, it works.
I remember in the past years, I preferred tomcat for Java Web applications
because I did not need to register a Jdbc driver but it is tedious work in
Java EE application servers, such as Glassfish
ership Unleashing Business Potential
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 7:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
Shawn,
On 12/17/20 14:21, Beard, Shawn wrote:
> Well
Shawn,
On 12/17/20 14:21, Beard, Shawn wrote:
Well the other tomcat servers had a custom factory specified. That
was the only difference. (devs wrote their own library for it)
So they were different. It's always misleading when getting a report
like this:
On 12/15/20 15:35, Beard, Shawn wrote:
ubject: Re: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
Shawn,
On 12/17/20 11:04, Beard, Shawn wrote:
> I was able to fix this. I added this to the config:
>
> factory="org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory"
>
> I was then seeing maxConnecti
Shawn,
On 12/17/20 11:04, Beard, Shawn wrote:
I was able to fix this. I added this to the config:
factory="org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory"
I was then seeing maxConnections of 50 in jmx and not 8.
So Phil was right: you needed to s/maxActive/maxTotal/.
That doesn't sounds righ
sbe...@wrberkley.com<mailto:sbe...@wrberkley.com>
-Original Message-
From: Beard, Shawn
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 7:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
Yes same version of tomcat 9.0.31,
<mailto:sbe...@wrberkley.com>
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 3:37 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
On 12/15/20 1:35 PM, Beard, Shawn wrote:
> No intitialSi
com>
-Original Message-
From: Johnson, Jim
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:22 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
Hi Shawn,
No, I don't think that maxActive means that it's defining the m
...@wrberkley.com<mailto:sbe...@wrberkley.com>
-Original Message-
From: Jalaj Asher
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
Hi Shawn,
Check the Catalina home and see i
:22 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
Attention: This email was sent from someone outside of eClinicalWorks. Always
use caution when opening attachments or clicking links from unknown senders or
when receiving unexpected emails.
Hi Shawn,
No, I don
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:22 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
Hi Shawn,
No, I don't think that maxActive means that it's defining the maximum number of
connections for the pool, I think it's stri
: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
But wouldn’t maxActive mean the connection pool has a max of 50 conenctions? On
other tomcat servers I have, maxActive is set to 50 and I verified im jmx that
there are 50 max connections
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Beard, Shawn
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
If default is 10, they why would we be getting an error about 8 being max?
Shawn Beard
Sr. Systems Engineer |
Beard
Sr. Systems Engineer |
BTS
Middleware Engineering | +1-515-564-2528 |
sbe...@wrberkley.com<mailto:sbe...@wrberkley.com>
-Original Message-
From: Johnson, Jim
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 1:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE
-
From: Johnson, Jim
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 1:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jdbc connction pool issues [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
Hi Shawn,
I think you’re missing initialSize
initialSize
(int)The initial number of connections that are created when the pool is
s
Hi Shawn,
I think you’re missing initialSize
initialSize
(int)The initial number of connections that are created when the pool is
started. Default value is 10
maxActive
(int) The maximum number of active connections that can be allocated from this
pool at the same time. The default value is 10
Hey Dave B. ,
My question from chris was for your benefit.
default configuration is not the same thing as vendor neutral.
chris wrote: > If you use both, you should be all set for whichever pool
you use at
runtime. DOH !
>If you look in your log file, you will notice that when Tomcat starts
>up
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:47 AM Dave Bothwell
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based on the
> documentation it is clear that DBCP pooling has changed the maxActive
> attribute to maxTotal. However it is unclear, based on this document
> https://tomcat.apac
chris,
Is commons-dbcp-2.x a Database pooling component for any container
Jetty,Jboss tomcat etc. ?
is commons-dbcp-2.x a third option, separate option from the two pooling
options [tomcat-pool and commons-pool] you mentioned ?
On 03/01/2020 23:21, Dave Bothwell wrote:
Chris,
That w
Chris,
That was very helpful.
Thank you
Dave
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:29 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dave,
>
> On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
> > I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dave,
On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
> I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based on
> the documentation it is clear that DBCP pooling has changed the
> maxActive attribute to maxTotal. However it is unclear, based on
> this
|I hope these descriptions of the setting helps you in making a decision
as to the value.
|
|maxActive| (int) The maximum number of active connections that can be
allocated from this pool at the same time. The default value is |100|||
|
|
On 03/01/2020 18:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
Hello,
I don't have one. I'm creating the pool in code. Basically like this:
PoolConfiguration p = new PoolProperties();
p.setUrl(url);
p.setDriverClassName(driverClass);
p.setUsername(username);
p.setPassword(password);
p.setJmxEnabled(true);
p.setTestWhileIdle(true);
p.setTestOnBorrow(true);
p.setTes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 8/11/16 3:33 PM, John Huss wrote:
> I have verified that in version 8.0.36 of tomcat jdbc the
> validation query functionality does not commit the transaction it
> starts in order to run the validation query, which can cause an
> open trans
2016-08-12 13:46 GMT+02:00 John Huss :
> In every database I have used every query requires a transaction. Often
> they will start them automatically if you don't do it explicitly.
Right , but I guess that Tomcat uses JDBC connections and I wonder why
for executing validationQuery sentence, Tomcat
In every database I have used every query requires a transaction. Often
they will start them automatically if you don't do it explicitly.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 4:13 AM Jose María Zaragoza
wrote:
> 2016-08-11 21:33 GMT+02:00 John Huss :
> > I have verified that in version 8.0.36 of tomcat jdbc t
2016-08-11 21:33 GMT+02:00 John Huss :
> I have verified that in version 8.0.36 of tomcat jdbc the validation query
> functionality does not commit the transaction it starts in order to run the
> validation query, which can cause an open transaction for a very long time
> (possibly until the databa
a: Christoph Nenning [mailto:christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net]
> Inviato: martedì 2 agosto 2016 09:44
> A: Tomcat Users List
> Oggetto: Re: jdbc check available database
>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I’ve SQL Server database with Tomcat 7 and, when I restart only
> database,
> Hello guys,
>
> I’ve SQL Server database with Tomcat 7 and, when I restart only
database,
> webapps on Tomcat didn’t works , it show me error to connect to
database ..
>
> In webapp context I use jdbc driver for connect, so there is a kind of
> method for retry to connect to database when it
Am 22.01.2016 um 12:35 schrieb R. Sriram:
Hello I am trying to establish connection pooling.
Should I be using dbcp?
If you want to use db connection pooling, it is probably a good idea to
use the pooling method the container gives you, as it will be used by a
lot of people and therefore has go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nathan,
On 10/9/15 4:11 PM, Nathan Boyce wrote:
> Does the tomcat jdbc pool use its own executor or does it share
> the executor that's calling it?
A connection pool rarely has a thread pool associated with it: it's
just a repository for connection
Thanks for the idea with the view!
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Felix Schumacher
wrote:
> Am 19.02.2015 um 13:58 schrieb Leonid Rozenblyum:
>>
>> I'm sorry for the late response.
>>
>> 1. After deeper check I see our structure is NOT much more complex
>> than standard Tomcat structure.
>> Act
Am 19.02.2015 um 13:58 schrieb Leonid Rozenblyum:
I'm sorry for the late response.
1. After deeper check I see our structure is NOT much more complex
than standard Tomcat structure.
Actually the significant difference is : user roles table has foreign
key to id in users table (so we join by id n
I'm sorry for the late response.
1. After deeper check I see our structure is NOT much more complex
than standard Tomcat structure.
Actually the significant difference is : user roles table has foreign
key to id in users table (so we join by id not by username)
2. Great news about fix in 8.0.19!
Am 5. Februar 2015 22:21:38 MEZ, schrieb Leonid Rozenblyum
:
>Hello Felix!
>Thanks for the detail answer! Good suggestion about DataSourceRealm!
>(I thought about this possibility but then I discovered that we have
>extended JDBCRealm to support some complex DB structure so maybe this
>switch t
Hello Felix!
Thanks for the detail answer! Good suggestion about DataSourceRealm!
(I thought about this possibility but then I discovered that we have
extended JDBCRealm to support some complex DB structure so maybe this
switch to another Realm is not SO easy as it should be).
Is it a good idea t
Hi Leonid,
Am 05.02.2015 um 16:28 schrieb Leonid Rozenblyum:
Hello!
After upgrading from Tomcat7 to Tomcat8 we started facing exceptions:
rg.apache.catalina.realm.JDBCRealm getPassword
SEVERE: Exception performing authentication
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: This statement has been closed
or not?
JDBCRealm is pretty stupid.
- -chris
> De : Felix Schumacher
> Envoyé : mercredi 4 février
> 2015 20:11 À : Tomcat Users List Objet : Re: JDBC authentication
> problem
>
> Am 04.02.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Luc DALLEMANE:
>>
l" connexion.
>
>With this, we are now able to connect to the site even after a long
>period of inactivity.
>
>Thank you for your help, and maybe this could help someone else.
>
>Regards, Luc.
>________
>De : Felix Schumacher
>Envoy
ld help someone else.
Regards, Luc.
De : Felix Schumacher
Envoyé : mercredi 4 février 2015 20:11
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: JDBC authentication problem
Am 04.02.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Luc DALLEMANE:
> Hi,
>
> I'm back again with the probl
onstantin Kolinko
Envoyé : mardi 3 février 2015 12:33
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: JDBC authentication problem
2015-02-03 14:29 GMT+03:00 Luc DALLEMANE :
Hi,
Thanks for the reply, I tried to add the options you told me about
(testWhileIdle, timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis, and maxConnLifetimeMilli
uch a long period of trying to connect.
Thank you again for your ideas and haven't found a solution.
Regards, Luc.
De : Konstantin Kolinko
Envoyé : mardi 3 février 2015 12:33
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: JDBC authentication problem
2015-02-03 14:2
2015-02-03 14:29 GMT+03:00 Luc DALLEMANE :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply, I tried to add the options you told me about
> (testWhileIdle, timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis, and maxConnLifetimeMillis),
> but I'm still unable to log after un hour ...
Do you have validationQuery configured? testOnBorr
), because nobody have a solution for this in mine.
Thank you for your help !! And if you have another idea... you're welcome again.
Regards, Luc.
De : Felix Schumacher
Envoyé : lundi 2 février 2015 18:59
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: JDBC authenti
onnections
(but why should I use a pool then?).
Hope this helps
Felix
-Message d'origine-
De : Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Envoyé : lundi 2 février 2015 16:19
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: JDBC authentication problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSA
I'm using the DataSourceRealm provided with Tomcat7.
-Message d'origine-
De : Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Envoyé : lundi 2 février 2015 16:19
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: JDBC authentication problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Luc,
On 2/2/15 6:11 AM, Luc DALLEMANE wrote:
> I tried to switch to DataSourceRealm but my problem is here again.
>
> After a while, the authentication is still impossible. Maybe i
> have missed something about the DataSource in the doc but I'm abl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Aniket,
On 2/2/15 3:09 AM, Aniket Bhoi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Aniket,
>>
>> On 1/30/15 10:01 AM, Aniket B
work admin looked the firewall config and told me the config was OK ...
So, if you have any idea, you're welcome !
Regards, Luc.
De : Luc DALLEMANE
Envoyé : vendredi 30 janvier 2015 15:39
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : RE: JDBC authentication problem
O
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Aniket,
>
> On 1/30/15 10:01 AM, Aniket Bhoi wrote:
> > I have Apache Solr hosted on Tomcat 6.
> >
> > There have been no changes to the code on Tomc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Aniket,
On 1/30/15 10:01 AM, Aniket Bhoi wrote:
> I have Apache Solr hosted on Tomcat 6.
>
> There have been no changes to the code on Tomcat whatsoever.However
> for the last few days I now see this error in the Log files:
>
> SEVERE: Full Import
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Aniket Bhoi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Apache Solr hosted on Tomcat 6.
>
> There have been no changes to the code on Tomcat whatsoever.However for the
> last few days I now see this error in the Log files:
>
> SEVERE: Full Import failed
> Throwable occurred:
> org.ap
Ok, I'm going to try this.
Hope this will help to solve my problem.
Regards Luc D.
-Message d'origine-
De : Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 30 janvier 2015 15:24
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: JDBC authentication problem
be ok and in production . (But didn't saw i had
> paste it ...)
Good. :)
- -chris
> -Message d'origine- De : Konstantin Kolinko
> [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com] Envoyé : vendredi 30 janvier 2015
> 14:52 À : Tomcat Users List Objet : Re: JDBC authentication
> prob
@gmail.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 30 janvier 2015 14:52
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: JDBC authentication problem
2015-01-30 16:45 GMT+03:00 Luc DALLEMANE :
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm facing a problem with my web application.
>
>
> I'm using Tomcat 7.0.56, Java 1.8, Postgres
2015-01-30 16:45 GMT+03:00 Luc DALLEMANE :
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm facing a problem with my web application.
>
>
> I'm using Tomcat 7.0.56, Java 1.8, Postgres 9.4 and Debian 7.
>
> The application is configured as followed :
>
>
> The web server is located in a DMZ.
>
> The database server is located in ou
Hi Chris,
There are 2 cases:
- When we try to execute some statement and the connection is lost, we
would like to retry some times, to show Popup Window to the client with
notification, etc.
- We have application, which depends on another database application. If
the connection to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Miro,
On 6/19/14, 9:42 AM, Miroslav Nachev wrote:
> Is it possible to configure JDBC-Pool for the following
> functionality or I need to write my own interceptors and
> Validator?
>
> - Retry N times to getConnection() for OnBorrow/OnConnect and
>
On May 27, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Huub Sepers wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are experiencing some problems while using the tomcat jdbc pool.
>
>
>
> Tomcat version: apache-tomcat-7.0.29
Try the latest version. Your's is pretty old.
>
> Pool settings:
>
> factory="org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.Data
Sorry, I probably did not make myself clear.
I certainly do not suggest to issue the rollback on each connection
checkout, but only as part of the validation process - because this is
where the problem lies and only there - which I would imagine is triggered
only occasionally (when connection is i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Pascal,
On 1/4/13 5:56 PM, Davoust, Pascal wrote:
> Indeed I was referring to the tomcat jdbc-pool code, not mine :-).
>
> Now, I would suggest to consider that this problem is more common
> than you could imagine at first sight. First because this
Indeed I was referring to the tomcat jdbc-pool code, not mine :-).
Now, I would suggest to consider that this problem is more common than you
could imagine at first sight. First because this is randomly occuring, but
frequently enough so that it shows up in quite a few areas.
A few examples where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Pid,
On 1/4/13 4:26 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 20:34, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> On 1/3/13 12:49 PM, Davoust, Pascal wrote:
>>>
>>> I then had a look at the corresponding code into the tomcat
>>> jdbc pool (source 7.0.34), and more specifica
On 04/01/2013 20:34, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pascal,
>
> On 1/3/13 12:49 PM, Davoust, Pascal wrote:
>> I'm using the tomcat jdbc connection pool (7.0.34) to connect
>> against a PostgreSQL database (version 8.4 - jdbc driver 9.0.801)
>> and I'm having a potentially dodgy situation with the va
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Pascal,
On 1/3/13 12:49 PM, Davoust, Pascal wrote:
> I'm using the tomcat jdbc connection pool (7.0.34) to connect
> against a PostgreSQL database (version 8.4 - jdbc driver 9.0.801)
> and I'm having a potentially dodgy situation with the validation
Ok it turns out it was bound to an private ip address on ec2, thanks Dan!
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:52 PM, S Ahmed wrote:
> ubuntu:~$ mysql -u root -p
> Enter password:
> Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g.
> Your MySQL connection id is 58
> Server version: 5.1.63-0ubuntu
ubuntu:~$ mysql -u root -p
Enter password:
Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g.
Your MySQL connection id is 58
Server version: 5.1.63-0ubuntu0.11.04.1-log (Ubuntu)
Copyright (c) 2000, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Oracle is a registered trademark of
I'll report back tonight, thanks again!
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:55 AM, S Ahmed wrote:
>
> > Dan,
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > From the terminal I was very explicit, I did this:
> >
> >> mysql --host localhost --port 3306 --user myu
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:55 AM, S Ahmed wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> From the terminal I was very explicit, I did this:
>
>> mysql --host localhost --port 3306 --user myuser --password
>> password: 123
>
> And it worked fine. In my log4net, I believe I set jdbc logs to be ALL or
>
Dan,
Thanks for your help.
>From the terminal I was very explicit, I did this:
>mysql --host localhost --port 3306 --user myuser --password
>password: 123
And it worked fine. In my log4net, I believe I set jdbc logs to be ALL or
DEBUG (i'll check when I get home), but it didn't output the host
On Nov 12, 2012, at 10:55 PM, S Ahmed wrote:
> I can't seem to connect to my mysql database from my java code, but I can
> do it via terminal using the user and password that is in my spring context
> file.
>
> I also tried modifying it to localhost:3306 but that didn't change anything
> (it defa
This same setup works fine locally on my laptop..so it does work :)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:55 PM, S Ahmed wrote:
> I can't seem to connect to my mysql database from my java code, but I can
> do it via terminal using the user and password that is in my spring context
> file.
>
> I also tried
[mailto:sanjeev.sha...@buchanan-edwards.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 4:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JDBC Connection over VPN
Telnet seems to connect.
-Original Message-
From: Saurabh Makol [mailto:saurabh.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Telnet seems to connect.
-Original Message-
From: Saurabh Makol [mailto:saurabh.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JDBC Connection over VPN
Can you run
telnet 1521 from command prompt when you VPN into your
network?
On Mon, May 7
m: Propes, Barry L [mailto:barry.l.pro...@citi.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 3:43 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: JDBC Connection over VPN
>
> Could the VPN connection be utlizing the same port Tomcat or Oracle
> usually does? Like something at 8080?
>
> No
Using port 1521 in both cases, but it only fails for JDBC.
-Original Message-
From: Propes, Barry L [mailto:barry.l.pro...@citi.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 3:43 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JDBC Connection over VPN
Could the VPN connection be utlizing the same p
Could the VPN connection be utlizing the same port Tomcat or Oracle usually
does? Like something at 8080?
Not sure if that's the case; or conversely, does going into VPN block those
ports?
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:sanjeev.sha...@buchanan-edwards.com]
Sent: Monday
I'm using tomcat 7, in a spring mvc application. The properties is in my
spring-context.xml file.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel,
On 4/4/12 8:46 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> My db connections seem to be lost after an extended period of
>> inactivity (for a web application). And the only way to get the
>> connections to work again is to res
Daniel,
Your suggestion seems to have worked so far, thanks!
testOnBorrow="true" and "validationQuery=SELECT 1"
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > My db connections seem to be lost after an extended period of
> > inactivity
>
> There cou
sers List"
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:05:50 AM
> Subject: RE: [JDBC Pool] PoolCleaner creates some sort of memory
>
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> > 2012/3/30 Osipov, Michael :
> >> Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewv
> From: "Barry L Propes"
> To: "Tomcat Users List"
> Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 7:53:26 AM
> Subject: RE: jdbc pool properties
>
> There are some databases that do go in and periodically kill off
> connections, aside from the Tomcat settings.
>
> I
"true"
timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis="-1"
minEvictableIdleTimeMillis="28800"
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: jdbc pool properties
- Original Message -
> My d
- Original Message -
> My db connections seem to be lost after an extended period of
> inactivity
There could be a number of reasons that this occurs. Perhaps a network issue
is causing them to be disconnected or the database may be timing them out. At
any rate, it's not likely that
On 04/04/2012 12:08, S Ahmed wrote:
> My db connections seem to be lost after an extended period of inactivity
> (for a web application). And the only way to get the connections to work
> again is to restart tomcat.
>
> My tomcat.jdbc.pool.Datasource settings have:
>
>
>
>
>
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/30 Osipov, Michael :
>> Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1306946
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, I am having trouble to build from source. I do
>> have some test failures, should I ignore them and go on?
>
>
2012/3/30 Osipov, Michael :
> Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1306946
>
> Thanks for the patch, I am having trouble to build from source. I do have
> some test failures, should I ignore them and go on?
Please be more specific. In what test
Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1306946
Thanks for the patch, I am having trouble to build from source. I do have some
test failures, should I ignore them and go on?
Another one, can we have a clearer name for the thread, e.g. like the I ha
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1306946
> -Original Message-
> From: Osipov, Michael [mailto:michael.osi...@siemens.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 1:36 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: [JDBC Pool] PoolCleaner creates
Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> PoolCleaner is a static singleton. The pool cleaner thread will not
> be removed until all JDBC pools have been stopped.
> So, yes, one application can be the one that starts the thread, but
> not necessarily the one that stops it
Filip,
I have already notic
: SHA1
>
> Filip,
>
> On 3/28/12 12:00 PM, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> > PoolCleaner is a static singleton. The pool cleaner thread will not
> > be removed until all JDBC pools have been stopped. So, yes, one
> > application can be the one that starts the thread, but not
> > necessarily
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
On 3/28/12 12:00 PM, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> PoolCleaner is a static singleton. The pool cleaner thread will not
> be removed until all JDBC pools have been stopped. So, yes, one
> application can be the one that starts the thread,
PoolCleaner is a static singleton. The pool cleaner thread will not be removed
until all JDBC pools have been stopped.
So, yes, one application can be the one that starts the thread, but not
necessarily the one that stops it
Filip
> -Original Message-
> From: Osipov, Michael [mailto:mic
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/28 Osipov, Michael :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Recently this started to pop up in my logs:
>> 23.03.2012 14:12:28 org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader
>> clearReferencesThreads
>> SCHWERWIEGEND: The web application [/ket] appears to have started a
>> thread nam
2012/3/28 Osipov, Michael :
> Hi folks,
>
> Recently this started to pop up in my logs:
> 23.03.2012 14:12:28 org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader
> clearReferencesThreads
> SCHWERWIEGEND: The web application [/ket] appears to have started a thread
> named [PoolCleaner[18291494:1332172047
Am Montag, den 26.03.2012, 05:30 -0600 schrieb Terence M. Bandoian:
> Apparently, Tomcat (6.0.29) takes care of that if the
> driver is located in the Tomcat lib directory but not if it is
> located
> in web application's lib directory.
Tomcat does not take care afaik - the classloader is not t
On 26/03/2012 12:30, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
> On 1:59 PM, Pid * wrote:
>> On 25 Mar 2012, at 03:10, "Terence M. Bandoian"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1:59 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 23 Mar 2012, at 21:59, David Kerber wrote:
> On 3/23/2012 6:51 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
>> On 1:59 P
On 1:59 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 25 Mar 2012, at 03:10, "Terence M. Bandoian" wrote:
On 1:59 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 23 Mar 2012, at 21:59, David Kerber wrote:
On 3/23/2012 6:51 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
Fr
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
