Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException on tomcat
cluster with SimpleTcpClusterstrategy
that is correct, we thought of this scenario and decided that we
wouldn't support it.
Not unreasonab
> From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException on tomcat
> cluster with SimpleTcpClusterstrategy
>
> that is correct, we thought of this scenario and decided that we
> wouldn't support it.
Not unreasonable to av
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException on tomcat
cluster with SimpleTcpClusterstrategy
given that the session should represent a client state,
and by the time the cluster tries to serialize it, the
> From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException on tomcat
> cluster with SimpleTcpClusterstrategy
>
> given that the session should represent a client state,
> and by the time the cluster tries to serialize it, the
