RE: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-26 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution > > > > You have to build with a 1.5 JDK because of some API-breaking > > > changes to the JDBC interfaces. > > > > Could you elaborate on that? Or

Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Hexsel, Gustavo schrieb: That helps! A few suggestions for the tomcat deployment: - make using log4j easier (either offer a binary version of tomcat-juli.jar that uses log4j - no source required since I can't build locally due to some dbcp error; alternatively it could use Tomcat 6 has stat

Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Mark Thomas
Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution You have to build with a 1.5 JDK because of some API-breaking changes to the JDBC interfaces. Could you elaborate on that? Or point us to a bugzilla entry? https

Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Ole Ersoy
Christopher Schultz wrote: SNIP There are things that I suspect are much easier to do using log4j (such as rolling logs on a schedule other than once per day) or things that cannot be done without either implementing a lot of stuff yourself or switching to log4j (such as logging to a database

Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ole, Ole Ersoy wrote: | I would go after Log4J in the tutorial, but to be honest I did not | really see any killer use cases for it. Also, for people just trying | to figure out logging, it's much easier to start with what's already | there [...] I

Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hexsel, Gustavo wrote: That helps! Whh. Good! I was a little worried people would say "This stinks! I'm more confused than ever!!!"...And then I would have to go back to the drawing board again. :-) A few suggestions for the tomcat deployment: - make using log4j easier (either

Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Ole Ersoy
Chuck, Thanks for the "Spring Cleaning" and the positive feed back! After 3 days of analyzing logging, I was feeling a little "Logged Out", so the pep definitely helps. I made all the changes you suggested (Good eye). I think it's ready the wiki now, unless anyone has additional modificati

RE: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Ole Ersoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution Thanks for putting this together. I have a few comments, mostly nit-picking. > The goal of this primer is to demonstrate how to to log with > java.util.logging (JULI) This give the impression that java.util.l

RE: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution > > You have to build with a 1.5 JDK because of some API-breaking > changes to the JDBC interfaces. Could you elaborate on that? Or point us to a bugzilla entry? I don't see such a

Re: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Mark Thomas
Hexsel, Gustavo wrote: That helps! A few suggestions for the tomcat deployment: - make using log4j easier (either offer a binary version of tomcat-juli.jar that uses log4j - no source required since I can't build locally due to some dbcp error; That could be because you are building with a

RE: [Logging] Tutorial Contribution

2008-06-25 Thread Hexsel, Gustavo
That helps! A few suggestions for the tomcat deployment: - make using log4j easier (either offer a binary version of tomcat-juli.jar that uses log4j - no source required since I can't build locally due to some dbcp error; alternatively it could use common-logging's autodetect, if log4j is avail