RE: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x

2023-03-22 Thread jonmcalexander
3 6:43 PM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x > > Jon, > > On 3/16/23 15:19, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID > &

RE: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x

2023-03-20 Thread jonmcalexander
gt; Subject: Re: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x > > Jon, > > On 3/16/23 15:19, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID > >> > >> Sent: Thursday, Mar

Re: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x

2023-03-20 Thread Christopher Schultz
Jon, On 3/16/23 15:19, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: -Original Message- From: jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 1:54 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: RE: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x -Original Message- From

RE: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x

2023-03-16 Thread jonmcalexander
> -Original Message- > From: jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID > > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 1:54 PM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: RE: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x > > > -Original Message- > > From: Torsten Krah > >

RE: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x

2023-03-16 Thread jonmcalexander
> -Original Message- > From: Torsten Krah > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 1:40 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x > > schrieb am Do., 16. März 2023, > 19:32: > > > Please read > https://urldefens

Re: Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x

2023-03-16 Thread Torsten Krah
schrieb am Do., 16. März 2023, 19:32: > Hi, > I have a really simple war file I created to "test" that Tomcat is coming > up and running. It works fine on Tomcat 8.5x, 9.0x, AND 10.0x, however on > 10.1.7 I am getting this strange stack trace. I'm not able to determine > just what is being called

Quick Question with Tomcat 10.1x

2023-03-16 Thread jonmcalexander
Hi, I have a really simple war file I created to "test" that Tomcat is coming up and running. It works fine on Tomcat 8.5x, 9.0x, AND 10.0x, however on 10.1.7 I am getting this strange stack trace. I'm not able to determine just what is being called out. SEVERE: Servlet.service() for servlet [j

Re: Quick question on version number

2010-12-07 Thread Mark Thomas
On 07/12/2010 13:29, Norman Wills wrote: Hi Folks, I was taking a look at a Tomcat 5.0.30 server for a client and checked out the security pages at tomcat.apache.org for updates and such. I had a quick question about the '.SVN' portion of the label "Fixed in Apache Tomcat 5.5.

Quick question on version number

2010-12-07 Thread Norman Wills
Hi Folks, I was taking a look at a Tomcat 5.0.30 server for a client and checked out the security pages at tomcat.apache.org for updates and such. I had a quick question about the '.SVN' portion of the label "Fixed in Apache Tomcat 5.5.25, 5.0.SVN" on the security page

Re: quick question regarding jsvc

2008-06-05 Thread Bill Barker
"David Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm seeing that as well. The root user jsvc process is parent to the > tomcat user jsvc process. You'll also notice from analysis of netstat's > output that the tomcat user jsvc process is the only one listening to >

Re: quick question regarding jsvc

2008-06-05 Thread David Smith
I'm seeing that as well. The root user jsvc process is parent to the tomcat user jsvc process. You'll also notice from analysis of netstat's output that the tomcat user jsvc process is the only one listening to ports. The one running as root is just there to spawn the true tomcat process wit

Re: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus

2007-04-16 Thread Lionel Crine
om my catalina.bat file although not sure if TC 4.1 will work well with that JDK or not. -Original Message- From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:59 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus Somewhere in the execution path you

RE: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus

2007-03-15 Thread Propes, Barry L [GCG-NAOT]
ok, sorry about that. -Original Message- From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:22 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus Barry -- what you suggest only works on Windows boxes and only if using the *.bat files. The

Re: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus

2007-03-15 Thread David Smith
al Message- From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:59 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus Somewhere in the execution path you still have java 1.4.2. Check your PATH environment variable -- the first folder that contains j

RE: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus

2007-03-15 Thread Propes, Barry L [GCG-NAOT]
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:59 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus Somewhere in the execution path you still have java 1.4.2. Check your PATH environment variable -- the first folder that contains java.exe will be the one that returns.

Re: Quick Question for TomCat Gurus

2007-03-15 Thread David Smith
Somewhere in the execution path you still have java 1.4.2. Check your PATH environment variable -- the first folder that contains java.exe will be the one that returns. As to what jdk tomcat 4.1 is running with, check the manager webapp (http://localhost:8080/manager/html) and adjust the star

Quick Question for TomCat Gurus

2007-03-15 Thread Bruno Vilardo
Hello All, Tomcat 4.1 Suse Linux Enterprise Server Java 1.6.0 Is there any issue using Tomcat 4.1 with Java 1.6.0? Our System Admin has installed the Java 1.6.0 but when running the "java -version" it shows a different java version as below: $java -version java version "1.4.2_13" Java(TM) 2 Ru

Re: Quick question

2006-03-03 Thread Rakesh Patel
good to know. Should go in the FAQ that one! I guess instead I should mail.jar and activation.jar instead as needed. Cheers R Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Rakesh Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Quick question well i copied mail.jar, j2ee.jar and commons-logging.jar to

RE: Quick question

2006-03-03 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Rakesh Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Quick question > > well i copied mail.jar, j2ee.jar and commons-logging.jar to the > shared/lib directory. You must never, never, never expose j2ee.jar to a Tomcat environment. It contains duplicate classes that are

Re: Quick question

2006-03-03 Thread Rakesh Patel
Hi, well i copied mail.jar, j2ee.jar and commons-logging.jar to the shared/lib directory. On deployment i get this error: org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException: org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException: No suitable Log constructor [Ljava.lang.Class;@18d9850 for o

Re: Quick question

2006-03-03 Thread Rakesh Patel
I thought i'd start with a clean install of Tomcat and my latest war and then take it step-by-step. The error I am getting on deployment first time round is this: org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/activation/DataSource (Caused by java

Re: Quick question

2006-03-03 Thread David Delbecq
Yes, use shared/lib, common/lib is for classes that need to be accessible by webapps and by catalina. see http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/class-loader-howto.html for details David Kerber a écrit : > I thought it was .../shared/lib... ? > > > > Alex Jalali wrote: > >> You would have to a

Re: Quick question

2006-03-03 Thread David Kerber
I thought it was .../shared/lib... ? Alex Jalali wrote: You would have to add those to the ../WEB-INF/lib/ In this case for javax.mail.* you would need to downlaod the java mail API and put the mail.jar under that folder. Any package that you place in that folder will be added to your class

Re: Quick question

2006-03-02 Thread Alex Jalali
You would have to add those to the ../WEB-INF/lib/ In this case for javax.mail.* you would need to downlaod the java mail API and put the mail.jar under that folder. Any package that you place in that folder will be added to your class path automaticly. (for that conetext) so there is no need to d

Quick question

2006-03-02 Thread Rakesh Patel
Hi, apologies if this is an easy quesion but time is not on my side: 1. At my company we use Sun Application Server 8.1 for development and production. However, its not the lightest, fastest software in the world and I'm thinking about switching to Tomcat for development and later in the de