ety.com
Learn How We Can Empower You. View Our Demos.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of JK Connector vs. ARR
Nick Williams wrote:
...
>
>
> On the one hand,
Nick Williams wrote:
...
On the one hand, we could use the Apache JK Connector to direct requests to
Tomcat. On the other hand, since we’re using IIS7, we could use (and have
seen recommended) the Application Request Routing (ARR) library for IIS to
direct requests for Tomcat.
As it happens, I
On 22/03/2011 12:56, Nick Williams wrote:
> Also, the Apache Portable Runtime is only useful over HTTP and not AJP,
> right? Making that an advantage of ARR over JK?
There are BIO and APR/native versions of the Tomcat AJP connector.
APR/native can be useful for both HTTP and AJP. How useful depend
I’m working on designing a new production environment for our software, and
I’m curious about the best approach to take.
One of the plans we are testing out is to use IIS7 on Windows Server 2008 R2
with Tomcat 6.0.32 (with APR / tcnative enabled). However, we are a bit
confused as to the best ap
