ssage
From: Christopher Schultz
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Mon, March 14, 2011 3:09:35 PM
Subject: Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/14/2011 3:08 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>>From the definitions and discussions on google regardi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/14/2011 3:08 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>>From the definitions and discussions on google regarding loopback interface
> (localhost) it will go through the nic card for Windows unless you install a
> loopback adaptor. For Linux you do not nee
age
From: Christopher Schultz
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Mon, March 14, 2011 11:25:35 AM
Subject: Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/13/2011 5:01 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Also, I have measured around 600microseconds for resonse tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/13/2011 5:01 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Also, I have measured around 600microseconds for resonse time when using
> localhost and running the client on the same server as Tomcat but that was
> still
> going through the network card om by m
to other projects since I
could not think how more timing info.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Peter Crowther
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Mon, March 14, 2011 1:12:12 AM
Subject: Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
On 13 March 2011 21:01, Tony Anecito wrote:
> As some
On 3/14/2011 8:21 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
On 14 March 2011 12:08, David kerber wrote:
Dave, could you give us any more information about your network? What is
the piece that's at 80% utilisation when you see the trouble? Is it a
point-to-point connection, or an Ethernet LAN, or what? If i
On 14 March 2011 12:08, David kerber wrote:
> Dave, could you give us any more information about your network? What is
> the piece that's at 80% utilisation when you see the trouble? Is it a
> point-to-point connection, or an Ethernet LAN, or what? If it's Ethernet,
> what hardware are you usi
On 3/14/2011 3:12 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
On 13 March 2011 21:01, Tony Anecito wrote:
As someone mentioned the network can imit you. If your bandwidth
utilization is
at 60% or over you are in trouble since collisions start to become a
serious
issue.
Collisions may or may not be an issue, de
On 13 March 2011 21:01, Tony Anecito wrote:
> As someone mentioned the network can imit you. If your bandwidth
> utilization is
> at 60% or over you are in trouble since collisions start to become a
> serious
> issue.
>
> Collisions may or may not be an issue, depending on the exact mode of
opera
not Tomcat.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: David Kerber
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, March 12, 2011 6:41:30 AM
Subject: Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
I've thought about that, but I would think I would be maxing out the cpu
if tomcat's processing were the limit. I&#x
) and network circuitry on my systems is the current limiting
factor and not Tomcat.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: David Kerber
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, March 12, 2011 6:41:30 AM
Subject: Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
I've thought about that, but I would think I
On 11 March 2011 20:02, David kerber wrote:
> I've already checked my connection bandwidth, and that still has some
> headroom, though not a lot.
>
> What's "not a lot"? If latency across the connection is starting to
increase due to congestion, that could increase the time to process
requests,
ny
- Original Message
From: David kerber
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Fri, March 11, 2011 1:02:12 PM
Subject: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
How might I expect the performance of 7 to compare to a late rev of 5.5 or
6.0.x, running under JRE 6? Specifically, my application has lots of small,
to 100
req per second at best. You might only get that at best.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: David kerber
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Fri, March 11, 2011 1:02:12 PM
Subject: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
How might I expect the performance of 7 to compare to a late rev of 5.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 3/11/2011 3:02 PM, David kerber wrote:
> How might I expect the performance of 7 to compare to a late rev of 5.5
> or 6.0.x, running under JRE 6? Specifically, my application has lots of
> small, simple requests, and the app does nothing bu
How might I expect the performance of 7 to compare to a late rev of 5.5
or 6.0.x, running under JRE 6? Specifically, my application has lots of
small, simple requests, and the app does nothing but de-obfuscate (it's
not really sophisticated enough to call it encryption) the data and save
it to
16 matches
Mail list logo
