-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff,
On 6/13/2011 4:41 PM, Jeff Sturm wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bill Miller [mailto:millebi.subscripti...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 3:58 PM
>>
Enlighten me: what is "the" reason that this is common practice?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
This is fun.
On 6/13/2011 3:58 PM, Bill Miller wrote:
>>> Enlighten me: what is "the" reason that this is common practice?
>
> The most obvious reason for having HTTP server in front of an
> Application Server (Tomcat) is that there are many t
On 13 June 2011 21:41, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> > From: Bill Miller [mailto:millebi.subscripti...@gmail.com]
> > -Static image serving (much more economical because the HTTP server is
> much lighter
> > "weight" than a JVM/App server) -etc...
>
> [...]
I just tried a trivial benchmark of a static fil
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Miller [mailto:millebi.subscripti...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 3:58 PM
>
> >> Enlighten me: what is "the" reason that this is common practice?
...
> -Static image serving (much more economical because the HTTP server is much
> lighter
> "we
an HTTP server?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: June 13, 2011 3:44 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sriram,
On 6/11/2011 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sriram,
On 6/11/2011 4:00 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
> Sriram,
>
> On 6/10/2011 1:49 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Having one application serve static content, and having other
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Sriram Narayanan [mailto:sriram...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
>
>> I myself agree that common practice is not the same as best practice,
>> t
> From: Sriram Narayanan [mailto:sriram...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
> I myself agree that common practice is not the same as best practice,
> though in my experience as a developer + sysadmin for the past few
> years, it is
I re-read my own responses. It looks like some context has not come
across in the non-interative nature of email.
I myself agree that common practice is not the same as best practice,
though in my experience as a developer + sysadmin for the past few
years, it is indeed ideal to separate the servi
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sriram,
>
> On 6/10/2011 1:49 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>> Having one application serve static content, and having other
>> applications serve other content (accept http requests, pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sriram,
On 6/10/2011 1:49 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> Having one application serve static content, and having other
> applications serve other content (accept http requests, perform some
> processing, and send back responses, for e.g.), is actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 6/9/2011 9:40 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Anand HS [mailto:anan...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
>
>> We plan to use tomcat to let users download stati
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Caldarale, Charles R
>> Subject: RE: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
>
>> > We plan to use tomcat to let users download static content
>> > ( media, executables etc.. ).
bject: RE: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
>
> > > We plan to use tomcat to let users download static content
> > > ( media, executables etc.. ).
>
> > As much as I like Tomcat, I have to think it might be more
> > appropriate to use Apach
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
> > We plan to use tomcat to let users download static content
> > ( media, executables etc.. ).
> As much as I like Tomcat, I have to think it might be more
> appropr
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Anand HS [mailto:anan...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
>
>> We plan to use tomcat to let users download static content
>> ( media, executables etc.. ).
&
> From: Anand HS [mailto:anan...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Optimal Settings to use Tomcat as a HTTP File Server
> We plan to use tomcat to let users download static content
> ( media, executables etc.. ).
As much as I like Tomcat, I have to think it might be more appropriate to use
Hi,
We plan to use tomcat to let users download static content ( media,
executables etc.. ). I was curious to know if any one has attempted it
before and if so, the settings that we need to make to tomcat configurations
to make it optimally serve static content.
Thanks,
Anand
18 matches
Mail list logo
