RE: Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in Tomcat 7

2012-08-31 Thread CASALINO, Matteo Maria
> > > > Would it be possible for you to set up a simple test case and package > > it as a WAR? Also, write-up a set of URLs and your expectations about > > whether they should work or not and attach all that to a Bugzilla > > report: > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Tomc

RE: Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in Tomcat 7

2012-08-30 Thread CASALINO, Matteo Maria
Dear Chris, > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Sent: mercredi 29 août 2012 20:06 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in > Tomcat 7 > > Would it be poss

RE: Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in Tomcat 7

2012-08-30 Thread CASALINO, Matteo Maria
> -Original Message- > From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] > Sent: mercredi 29 août 2012 22:34 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in > Tomcat 7 > > > The problem occurs for HTTP re

RE: Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in Tomcat 7

2012-08-29 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: CASALINO, Matteo Maria [mailto:matteo.maria.casal...@sap.com] > Subject: Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in Tomcat 7 > The problem occurs for HTTP requests matching to the most specific URL > pattern (in the above example, /a/b, /a/b/c, etc.), Please st

Re: Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in Tomcat 7

2012-08-29 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matteo, On 8/29/12 11:24 AM, CASALINO, Matteo Maria wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm experiencing a weird behaviour with certain combinations of > security constraints having the following pattern: (i) one security > constraint applies to (at least)

Nondeterministic behaviour of security constraints in Tomcat 7

2012-08-29 Thread CASALINO, Matteo Maria
Hello everyone, I'm experiencing a weird behaviour with certain combinations of security constraints having the following pattern: (i) one security constraint applies to (at least) two overlapping URL patterns ending in /*, where one is more specific than the other (e.g., /a/* and /a/b/*) (ii) a