Re: ajp connector, nio vs nio2

2020-03-13 Thread Chris Cheshire
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 10:09 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 13/03/2020 13:54, Chris Cheshire wrote: > > Using 9.0.31 on Java 8, I have my AJP connector configured as > > > > > secretRequired="false" /> > > > > According to the logs, this is defaulting to the NIO protocol. > > Correct. > > > The >

Re: ajp connector, nio vs nio2

2020-03-13 Thread Mark Thomas
On 13/03/2020 13:54, Chris Cheshire wrote: > Using 9.0.31 on Java 8, I have my AJP connector configured as > > secretRequired="false" /> > > According to the logs, this is defaulting to the NIO protocol. Correct. > The > connector comparison chart [1] implies that NIO2 is used for 8.5x > onwar

ajp connector, nio vs nio2

2020-03-13 Thread Chris Cheshire
Using 9.0.31 on Java 8, I have my AJP connector configured as According to the logs, this is defaulting to the NIO protocol. The connector comparison chart [1] implies that NIO2 is used for 8.5x onwards. Shouldn't the AJP/1.3 protocol alias be using NIO2 by default (I don't have APR/native insta

NIO vs NIO2

2018-12-23 Thread George Stanchev
Hi, We are currently on the latest TC 8.5.37 but soon will be moving to latest 9. Currently we use NIO connectors. I am having hard time evaluating the need (if necessary) to switch to NIO2. Can someone point me to a good resource/link where the two connectors are compared and which situations