On 27/02/2012 22:23, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 28/02/12 12:14 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> On 2/26/12 11:29 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>>> From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:amania...@apache.org] Subject:
>>>>> Re: parallel de
On 28/02/12 12:14 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/26/12 11:29 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:amania...@apache.org] Subject:
Re: parallel deployment: multiple applications responding
What happens if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/26/12 11:29 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:amania...@apache.org] Subject:
>> Re: parallel deployment: multiple applications responding
>
>> What happens if our application defi
> From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:amania...@apache.org]
> Subject: Re: parallel deployment: multiple applications responding
> What happens if our application defines a static class or
> other resource?
Not sure what you mean by "static class", unless you're r
On 27/02/12 2:12 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
It would be nice if it showed as "disabled" (to use the mod_jk
terminology for an instance which is running but gets no new
sessions).
It's just a coincidence that no new sessions are being created --
because sessionless requests /should/ be sen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aristedes,
On 2/23/12 4:29 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> Given that we've definitely seen this happen with our sessionless
> application, I'm not sure that will help us much. For our other
> apps which have sessions, what happens if the incoming co
On 23/02/12 7:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/02/2012 06:51, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
We've been using parallel deployment for some time now with tomcat
7.0.25. For the most part the parallel deployment is a really nice idea,
particularly because we don't have sessions serialised and clustered
On 23/02/2012 06:51, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> We've been using parallel deployment for some time now with tomcat
> 7.0.25. For the most part the parallel deployment is a really nice idea,
> particularly because we don't have sessions serialised and clustered
> across all running instances.
>
>
We've been using parallel deployment for some time now with tomcat 7.0.25. For
the most part the parallel deployment is a really nice idea, particularly
because we don't have sessions serialised and clustered across all running
instances.
However, we've had mysterious problems for some time no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 9/7/2009 6:05 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> The code of mod_jk (1.2.28) looks for a URL encoded session id (and uses
> that one if it finds one) and otherwise it takes all cookie session ids
> it can find in the order of Cookie headers in the re
Hi Chris,
On 04.09.2009 16:29, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Rainer,
>
> On 9/4/2009 12:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 03.09.2009 23:31, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Whenever a client browses to webapps found on / and /foo, the requests
>>> to /foo will get TWO cookies, and confusion may occur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 9/4/2009 12:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 03.09.2009 23:31, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Whenever a client browses to webapps found on / and /foo, the requests
>> to /foo will get TWO cookies, and confusion may occur (I'm not sure what
>>
On 03.09.2009 23:31, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Rainer,
>
> On 9/3/2009 4:36 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> No.
>
>> The stickyness doesn't magically track your clients. If the client sends
>> a session information, and the session information contains a route tag
>> (a suffix .nodeX, where nodeX is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 9/3/2009 4:36 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> No.
>
> The stickyness doesn't magically track your clients. If the client sends
> a session information, and the session information contains a route tag
> (a suffix .nodeX, where nodeX is set by the
On 02.09.2009 23:38, Jason Wright wrote:
> I've an interesting situation with our application clusters. I am running
> multiple applications for one of our websites. We don't share sessions
> between the different servers; we use sticky sessions instead. Session
> replicatio
Hello,
I've an interesting situation with our application clusters. I am running
multiple applications for one of our websites. We don't share sessions
between the different servers; we use sticky sessions instead. Session
replication is difficult because of the large size of our users
André Warnier wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Peter Flynn wrote:
I've been using Tomcat5 with Apache2 under RH5 to run Cocoon, but I
now need to add Lucene and eXist. Is it possible to run multiple
applications like this on the same ma
Peter Flynn wrote:
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Peter Flynn wrote:
I've been using Tomcat5 with Apache2 under RH5 to run Cocoon, but I
now need to add Lucene and eXist. Is it possible to run multiple
applications like this on the same machine using the same T
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Peter Flynn wrote:
I've been using Tomcat5 with Apache2 under RH5 to run Cocoon, but I
now need to add Lucene and eXist. Is it possible to run multiple
applications like this on the same machine using the same Tomcat
server?
Yes
Peter Flynn wrote:
> I've been using Tomcat5 with Apache2 under RH5 to run Cocoon, but I
> now need to add Lucene and eXist. Is it possible to run multiple
> applications like this on the same machine using the same Tomcat server?
>
> Someone mentioned something about "ano
> From: Peter Flynn [mailto:pfl...@ucc.ie]
> Subject: Multiple applications
>
> Is it possible to run multiple applications like this on
> the same machine using the same Tomcat server?
Clearly you can - look how many independent webapps are deployed in the
standard Tomcat dow
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Peter Flynn wrote:
>
> I've been using Tomcat5 with Apache2 under RH5 to run Cocoon, but I now need
> to add Lucene and eXist. Is it possible to run multiple applications like
> this on the same machine using the same Tomcat server?
Yes.
>
I've been using Tomcat5 with Apache2 under RH5 to run Cocoon, but I now
need to add Lucene and eXist. Is it possible to run multiple
applications like this on the same machine using the same Tomcat server?
Someone mentioned something about "another Tomcat instance" but I don
Hi,
(this is a repost. I inadvertently 'thread hijacked' when I initially
posted this question).
I'm looking for an example of using Mbeans to access the
org.apache.catalina.Manager interface to manage HttpSessions.
First off, however: is this possible?
We're interested in using thi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for an example of using Mbeans to access the
> org.apache.catalina.Manager interface to manage HttpSessions.
When starting a new thread (ie sending a message to the list about a
new topic) please do not reply to an existing message and change the
sub
Hi,
I'm looking for an example of using Mbeans to access the
org.apache.catalina.Manager interface to manage HttpSessions.
First off, however: is this possible?
We're interested in using this approach for managing single signon
between multiple web applications. (where accessing one session
an object that's shared with multiple applications?
Pid,
I'm sure this is a stupid question but...what? I don't follow.
I can store the object in a database? I'm limited to SQL Server.
Does that matter?
On 8/9/06, Pid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> put it in a datab
Pid,
I'm sure this is a stupid question but...what? I don't follow.
I can store the object in a database? I'm limited to SQL Server.
Does that matter?
On 8/9/06, Pid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
put it in a database?
0 8 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I currently have a JSP application under Tomcat that
I did, but then I get more than I get one object created for each application.
I literally just stumbled a mention of a "crossContext" setting in
Tomcat, but I'm still trying to figure out if that will help here.
On 8/9/06, Ryan O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I create a single obje
How can I create a single object when Tomcat starts up and access that
object from multiple web apps?
Thanks,
Matt
Have you added listener and listener-class tags in each applications'
web.xml?
Ryan
-
To start a new topic,
check jndi ressources
On 8/9/06, Pid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
put it in a database?
0 8 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I currently have a JSP application under Tomcat that uses an object
> created when Tomcat starts up. The object is created using a class
> that implements ServletContextListener and I
put it in a database?
0 8 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I currently have a JSP application under Tomcat that uses an object
> created when Tomcat starts up. The object is created using a class
> that implements ServletContextListener and I can call the object from
> my JSPs. All is well.
>
> Originally,
Hello,
I currently have a JSP application under Tomcat that uses an object
created when Tomcat starts up. The object is created using a class
that implements ServletContextListener and I can call the object from
my JSPs. All is well.
Originally, I thought I could have one of these objects per
33 matches
Mail list logo
