Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
. -chris -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:54 PM To: Tomcat Users List ; jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy Jon, On 12/6/22 16:22, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: What, pray tell, is an enc

RE: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-07 Thread jonmcalexander
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:54 PM > To: Tomcat Users List ; > jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID > Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy > > Jon, > > On 12/6/22 16:22, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > > What, pray tell, is an encrypted AJP connection?

Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-07 Thread Christopher Schultz
hultz Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 3:01 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy Jon, On 12/6/22 12:36, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: IMHO, switching to mod_proxy, and using it over SSL, is by far better than using mod_jk or mod_ajp, primarily as mod_

RE: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-06 Thread jonmcalexander
chultz > Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 3:01 PM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy > > Jon, > > On 12/6/22 12:36, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > > IMHO, switching to mod_proxy, and using it over SSL, is by far better than >

Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-06 Thread Christopher Schultz
Jon, On 12/6/22 12:36, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: IMHO, switching to mod_proxy, and using it over SSL, is by far better than using mod_jk or mod_ajp, primarily as mod_proxy allows for secure proxy connection, whereas mod_jk and mod_ajp aren't "secure" as they are not encrypte

RE: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-06 Thread jonmcalexander
essage in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Schultz > Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 11:21 AM > To: Tomcat Users List ; Mark H. Wood > > Subject:

Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-06 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 12/6/22 08:48, Mark H. Wood wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:37:59PM -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote: On 12/5/22 15:03, Cathy Spears wrote: Using Tomcat 8.5 and 9.0 with 32-bit Apache 2.4 and mod_jk. Are there benefits to using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk? Also, is there a planned e

Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-06 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:37:59PM -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote: > On 12/5/22 15:03, Cathy Spears wrote: > > Using Tomcat 8.5 and 9.0 with 32-bit Apache 2.4 and mod_jk. Are there > > benefits to using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk? Also, is there a > > planned end of life for mod_jk or will it co

Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-05 Thread Christopher Schultz
Cathy, On 12/5/22 15:03, Cathy Spears wrote: Using Tomcat 8.5 and 9.0 with 32-bit Apache 2.4 and mod_jk. Are there benefits to using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk? Also, is there a planned end of life for mod_jk or will it continue to be supported for now? Hopefully this will be helpful: https:/

Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy

2022-12-05 Thread Cathy Spears
Using Tomcat 8.5 and 9.0 with 32-bit Apache 2.4 and mod_jk. Are there benefits to using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk? Also, is there a planned end of life for mod_jk or will it continue to be supported for now? Thanks, Cathy DISCLAIMER: The information transmitted in this e-mail message and att

Re: mod_jk vs. mod_proxy

2012-09-19 Thread Shanti Suresh
Hi Chris, Appreciate your feedback. That is helpful. Thanks you! -Shanti On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Shanti, > > On 9/18/12 10:04 AM, Shanti Suresh wr

Re: mod_jk vs. mod_proxy

2012-09-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shanti, On 9/18/12 10:04 AM, Shanti Suresh wrote: > All, > > I wanted your opinion on this topic. I was heavily into using > "mod_jk" a few years back. But I have since started using > mod_proxy for the following reasons: (1) mod_proxy is easier to

Re: mod_jk vs. mod_proxy

2012-09-18 Thread Shanti Suresh
Hi Dan, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote: > > I've not heard this. Where did you read this? > My apologies! I read wrong. It must have been about "mod_jk2". I found this article helpful. > > > http://www.tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/06/16/deciding-between-modjk-modproxy

Re: mod_jk vs. mod_proxy

2012-09-18 Thread Daniel Mikusa
On Sep 18, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Shanti Suresh wrote: > All, > > I wanted your opinion on this topic. I was heavily into using "mod_jk" a > few years back. But I have since started using mod_proxy for the following > reasons: > (1) mod_proxy is easier to configure > (2) I remember reading that "mo

mod_jk vs. mod_proxy

2012-09-18 Thread Shanti Suresh
All, I wanted your opinion on this topic. I was heavily into using "mod_jk" a few years back. But I have since started using mod_proxy for the following reasons: (1) mod_proxy is easier to configure (2) I remember reading that "mod_jk" is deprecated (3) Logging for mod_proxy appears inline with

Re: mod_jk vs mod_proxy

2009-02-03 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Andrew, we've just been duscussing this topic a few days ago. You'll might want to read the whole thread @ http://www.nabble.com/AJP-vs-HTTP-connectors--td21797851.html Rgds Gregor -- just because your paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you... gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE02

mod_jk vs mod_proxy

2009-02-03 Thread Andrew Hole
Hi guys! Wich is the recommend module and what are the differences? Thanks a lot