David kerber wrote on 05/17/2010 12:43:17 PM:
> On 5/17/2010 2:19 PM, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> > "Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 05/17/2010
> > 12:14:21 PM:
> >
> >>> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> >>>
us ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:43:17 -0400
> From: dcker...@verizon.net
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
>
> On 5/17/2010 2:19 PM, peter_f...@blm.gov w
On 5/17/2010 2:19 PM, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
"Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 05/17/2010
12:14:21 PM:
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
The only 100% secure system is one that is turned off.
Not sure
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
>
> Unplugged then?
Unplugged and encased in lead, perhaps. Preferably in a dark cellar, with no
stairs, in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disu
"Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 05/17/2010
12:14:21 PM:
> > From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> > Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
> >
> > The only 100% secure system is one that is turned off.
>
> Not sure even
Unplugged then?
With today's wake-on-lan, always on NIC connectors, I can see what you
mean.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup ac
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
>
> The only 100% secure system is one that is turned off.
Not sure even that is sufficient...
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE
The only 100% secure system is one that is turned off.
-Original Message-
From: peter_f...@blm.gov [mailto:peter_f...@blm.gov]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
Well, it's the usual thing - you can h
Well, it's the usual thing - you can have a system that's completely open
but gets cratered because some duffer clicked the wrong button. Or you can
have a system that's 100% secure, but nobody can use it because it's 100%
secure. Or you can have something that's "secure enough" to protect from
acc
On 17/05/2010 18:14, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> Pid wrote on 05/17/2010 10:55:06 AM:
>
>> On 17/05/2010 17:48, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
>>> To clarify what I'm up to here - we have an in-house doc that suggests
>>> switching off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup on production systems, and
>>
>> Do
Pid wrote on 05/17/2010 10:55:06 AM:
> On 17/05/2010 17:48, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> > To clarify what I'm up to here - we have an in-house doc that suggests
> > switching off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup on production systems, and
>
> Does it explain why it makes this suggestion?
To preven
On 17/05/2010 17:48, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> To clarify what I'm up to here - we have an in-house doc that suggests
> switching off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup on production systems, and
Does it explain why it makes this suggestion?
> I've been testing those recommendations on an experimen
To clarify what I'm up to here - we have an in-house doc that suggests
switching off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup on production systems, and
I've been testing those recommendations on an experimental setup. What the
in-house doc forgets to say is what you've explained here (and which
answers my o
On 17/05/2010 17:33, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote on 05/17/2010 10:12:20 AM:
>> Not pointless. It limits deployed apps to *only* those defined in
>> server.xml.
>
> Ok - so if I want my app to start I have to place the context element in
> server.xml. I would have thought that an
Mark Thomas wrote on 05/17/2010 10:12:20 AM:
> On 17/05/2010 16:56, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
> >
> > I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is supposed
to
> > do, especially when it's set to "false".
>
> It controls if apps are deployed when Tomcat starts.
>
> > The basic que
On 17/05/2010 16:56, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is supposed to
> do, especially when it's set to "false".
>
> The basic question is, what is the purpose of this setting? It would appear
> that if you set it to "false", then applications
Notes inline...
"Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 05/17/2010
10:11:47 AM:
> > From: peter_f...@blm.gov [mailto:peter_f...@blm.gov]
> > Subject: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
> >
> >
> > I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup s
Oops, forgot to say. I'm on 6.0.26. The online documentation I read is at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/host.html#Automatic%20Application%20Deployment
...which is very clear about what happens with deployOnStartup="true" but
as far as I can see gives no details about what's supp
On 17/05/2010 16:56, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is supposed to
> do, especially when it's set to "false".
It controls if apps are deployed when Tomcat starts.
> The basic question is, what is the purpose of this setting? It would appea
> From: peter_f...@blm.gov [mailto:peter_f...@blm.gov]
> Subject: Misunderstanding deployOnStartup actions
>
>
> I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is
> supposed to do, especially when it's set to "false".
It defers webapp deployme
2010/5/17 :
> There's a couple of places in documentation (online, and also in the
> O'Reilly book) where it says you shouldn't have hot-deployment AND
> deployOnStart enabled because it can result in applications being deployed
> twice
1. For what Tomcat version?
2. Where online? Is it anywhere
I'm a bit confused about what the deployOnStartup setting is supposed to
do, especially when it's set to "false".
The basic question is, what is the purpose of this setting? It would appear
that if you set it to "false", then applications can only be started by
being hot-deployed, which seems rat
22 matches
Mail list logo
