Re: Missing TLS cipher suite definition

2021-10-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 10/10/21 13:47, Mark Thomas wrote: On 10/10/2021 13:00, Christopher Schultz wrote: On 10/9/21 04:52, Mark Thomas wrote: If the user is using e.g. BouncyCastle, IBM's JRE, Corretto, etc. those ciphers might be available in those environments. (It looks like BC supports this cipher

Re: Missing TLS cipher suite definition

2021-10-10 Thread Mark Thomas
On 10/10/2021 13:00, Christopher Schultz wrote: On 10/9/21 04:52, Mark Thomas wrote: If the user is using e.g. BouncyCastle, IBM's JRE, Corretto, etc. those ciphers might be available in those environments. (It looks like BC supports this cipher suite, but I couldn't find any information on

Re: Missing TLS cipher suite definition

2021-10-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 10/9/21 04:52, Mark Thomas wrote: On 08/10/2021 19:34, Farber, Ilja wrote: Hi all, I noticed org.apache.tomcat.util.net.openssl.ciphers.Cipher does not define the cipher suites defined by rfc 6367 and 6209. The ciphers are listed https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/specs/security

Re: Missing TLS cipher suite definition

2021-10-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/10/2021 19:34, Farber, Ilja wrote: Hi all, I noticed org.apache.tomcat.util.net.openssl.ciphers.Cipher does not define the cipher suites defined by rfc 6367 and 6209. The ciphers are listed https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/specs/security/standard-names.html and should be valid for T

Missing TLS cipher suite definition

2021-10-08 Thread Farber, Ilja
Hi all, I noticed org.apache.tomcat.util.net.openssl.ciphers.Cipher does not define the cipher suites defined by rfc 6367 and 6209. The ciphers are listed https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/specs/security/standard-names.html and should be valid for TLS 1.2. For example TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH