On 23.10.2006, at 23:09, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
Dan Baumann wrote:
Interesting. How does your webapp compare to MX4J's http adapter
(mx4j.sf.net)?
I didn't try hard, but I was unable to run mx4j and its http
adapter. So it's hard to compare with it.
http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/docs/ch05
Dan Baumann wrote:
Interesting. How does your webapp compare to MX4J's http adapter
(mx4j.sf.net)?
Hi,
I didn't try hard, but I was unable to run mx4j and its http adapter. So
it's hard to compare with it.
http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/docs/ch05.html
It seems that this adapter runs its own, ve
On 23.10.2006, at 10:07, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
Hi,
I hope you will not find it a spam ;-)
I wrote small application to work with Mbeans, and day after day it
evolved in something bigger. I'd like to present you a web enabled jmx
console. If you know what mbeans and jmx are you can give it a
Hi,
I hope you will not find it a spam ;-)
I wrote small application to work with Mbeans, and day after day it
evolved in something bigger. I'd like to present you a web enabled jmx
console. If you know what mbeans and jmx are you can give it a try.
This is alpha version, I'll appreciate your op
