On 14/03/2012 19:18, pricyber wrote:
> I downloaded the apache source code and commented out the line in
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProperties.setProperties(SocketProperties.java:184)
> where it say
> socket.setTrafficClass(soTrafficClass);
>
> And it works, but not sure if there are any
Any updates on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4674549.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-
I've confirm that -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true made no difference to the
Java 7 setup.
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4661984.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
I confirm that -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true or = false made no differnece
to the Java 7 setup.
Thanks alot!
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4630889.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.c
On 16/03/2012 18:08, pricyber wrote:
> I am doing this at the moment.
I am away all of this week, but I've got a note to look into the traffic
class config on Windows when I get back.
Can you just confirm that setting: -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true made
no difference to the Java 7 setup?
p
>
I am doing this at the moment.
diff
/apache-tomcat-6.0.35-src/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SocketProperties.java
< socket.setTrafficClass(soTrafficClass);
---
> try {
> socket.setTrafficClass(soTrafficClass);
> } catch (Throwable t) {
> //TODO: L
OK.
1. Can you set the address field manually, rather than letting the
defaults run?
I tried with either "localhost", "127.0.0.1" still doesnt work.
Also, can you please log "InetAddress.toString()" immediately before you
do the above line? I suspect Inet4 v Inet6 is the culprit.
Tried wi
On 15/03/2012 01:08, pricyber wrote:
> I did nothing in the xml files, but in the embedded tomcat I did this
> instead.
>
> connector = embedded.createConnector((String)null, port,
> Http11NioProtocol.class.getName());
OK.
1. Can you set the address field manually, rather than letting the
defaul
I did nothing in the xml files, but in the embedded tomcat I did this
instead.
connector = embedded.createConnector((String)null, port,
Http11NioProtocol.class.getName());
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4619650.html
S
I did nothing in the xml files, but in the embedded tomcat I did this
instead.
connector = embedded.createConnector((String)null, port,
Http11NioProtocol.class.getName());
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4619649.html
S
On 14/03/2012 18:04, pricyber wrote:
> It look like a similar issue with Tomcat 7
> http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Tomcat-7-Cluster-Issue-td4562937.html
I couldn't replicate the issue on OSX with Oracle Java 7u4 or OpenJDK.
The other thread referred to NIO configuration in the Cluster, which
imp
I downloaded the apache source code and commented out the line in
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProperties.setProperties(SocketProperties.java:184)
where it say
socket.setTrafficClass(soTrafficClass);
And it works, but not sure if there are any ill effects for doing that.
This problem only o
It look like a similar issue with Tomcat 7
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Tomcat-7-Cluster-Issue-td4562937.html
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4579220.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
I looked at the logs and I find this on Windows 2003 with Java 7 and tomcat
6.0.35
java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument: no further information
at sun.nio.ch.Net.setIntOption0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.Net.setSocketOption(Net.java:279)
at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.setOption(SocketChan
ou reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4567768.html
To unsubscribe from Java 7 + Tomcat 6.0.35 + Win2k3 Problem, click here.
NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.1
h Java 7 and Win2k3 with Tomcat 6.0.35?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> None I've heard of.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> p
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks al
gt;>>>> p
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks alot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You should supply some mode setup details:
>>>>> - is tc-native used? Binaries or compiled by yourself?
>>>&g
gt;>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks alot.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You should supply some mode setup details:
>>>> - is tc-native used? Binaries or compiled by yourself?
>>>> - What type of connector is used? Java BIO?
>
the access log valve to see if the request was
> >> processed by your tomcat (and check the status code)
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4567768.html
> To unsubscribe from Java 7 + Tomcat 6.0.35 + Win2k3 Problem, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4567875.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2012/3/11 pricyber :
> Using binaries downloaded in a embedded java application.
> I used Http11NIOProtocol, but if I use Http11Protocol, it works fine. So I
> think Http11NIOProtocal is the problem in my setup.
It is Http11NioProtocol. The spelling matters a lot.
> No logs at all when I use H
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4567286.html
> To unsubscribe from Java 7 + Tomcat 6.0.35 + Win2k3 Problem, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Java-7-Tomcat-6-0-35-Win2k3-Problem-tp4566739p4567612.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 11.03.2012 11:33, schrieb Pid:
On 11/03/2012 06:25, pricyber wrote:
Hi I recently upgrade JDK from 1.6 to 1.7u3. And tomcat no longer work on
Windows 2003, ie not sending response to any request either with https or
plain http. But the same code/setting works on Windows 7 and my ubuntu
machin
On 11/03/2012 06:25, pricyber wrote:
> Hi I recently upgrade JDK from 1.6 to 1.7u3. And tomcat no longer work on
> Windows 2003, ie not sending response to any request either with https or
> plain http. But the same code/setting works on Windows 7 and my ubuntu
> machine.
Error logs?
Access logs?
Hi I recently upgrade JDK from 1.6 to 1.7u3. And tomcat no longer work on
Windows 2003, ie not sending response to any request either with https or
plain http. But the same code/setting works on Windows 7 and my ubuntu
machine.
Are there known issues with Java 7 and Win2k3 with Tomcat 6.0.35?
Th
24 matches
Mail list logo
