-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jess,
On 3/12/2011 11:16 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
> Clearly there's normally extra expense for debug/smap information,
> though it's not clear to me whether this works against the 65K limit or
> not.
SMAP information is stored separately from the code,
Nevermind -- I examined other classes produced with 1.5 specified.
These were compiled for 1.5 (version 49.0 byte code).
On another ugly JSP, I note:
* Tomcat 6 - JDT targeting 1.5: 93K
* Tomcat 7 - JDT targeting 1.6: 149K
* Tomcat 7 - JDT targeting 1.5: 133K
* Tomcat 7 - javac (ex
On 3/11/2011 6:04 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
On 3/11/2011 3:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The obvious difference is that Tomcat 6 compilation targets Java 5
whereas Tomcat 7 targets Java 6. For a simple test JSP:
Tomcat 6 (1.5) - 3,488
Tomcat 7 (1.5) - 3,530 +1%
Tomcat 7 (1.6) - 3,668 +6%
The 1% will be
On 3/11/2011 4:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I'm interested in how you were able to do this. The 65k limitation is
for a single method, not the entire JSP. Yes, JSPs compile into a single
jspService method but when taglibs are used, each use generates its own
method which then gets called and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jess,
On 3/11/2011 7:04 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
> On 3/11/2011 3:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The obvious difference is that Tomcat 6 compilation targets Java 5
>> whereas Tomcat 7 targets Java 6. For a simple test JSP:
>> Tomcat 6 (1.5) - 3,488
>> Tomc
On 3/11/2011 3:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The obvious difference is that Tomcat 6 compilation targets Java 5
whereas Tomcat 7 targets Java 6. For a simple test JSP:
Tomcat 6 (1.5) - 3,488
Tomcat 7 (1.5) - 3,530 +1%
Tomcat 7 (1.6) - 3,668 +6%
The 1% will be a combination of:
- Tomcat 7 uses versio
On 11/03/2011 04:50, Bob Hall wrote:
>
> --- On Thu, 3/10/11 at 8:43 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
>
Yes, both Java 6 Update 24.
>>> Just to verify, are both instances Tomcat running in
>> the same JVM mode (-client or -server)? (That
>> shouldn't affect the .class file size, but just
>> checking.
--- On Thu, 3/10/11 at 8:43 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
> >> Yes, both Java 6 Update 24.
> > Just to verify, are both instances Tomcat running in
> the same JVM mode (-client or -server)? (That
> shouldn't affect the .class file size, but just
> checking...)
> Yes.
>
Have you compared the size of .
On 3/10/2011 10:34 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Jess Holle [mailto:je...@ptc.com]
Subject: Re: JSP class size increase in Tomcat 7
Yes, both Java 6 Update 24.
Just to verify, are both instances Tomcat running in the same JVM mode (-client
or -server)? (That shouldn't affec
> From: Jess Holle [mailto:je...@ptc.com]
> Subject: Re: JSP class size increase in Tomcat 7
> Yes, both Java 6 Update 24.
Just to verify, are both instances Tomcat running in the same JVM mode (-client
or -server)? (That shouldn't affect the .class file size, but just checking
Yes, both Java 6 Update 24.
Both using the same doc-base, file paths, etc. I renamed the old Tomcat
directory and put the new one in its place.
On 3/10/2011 10:01 PM, Bob Hall wrote:
Jess,
--- On Thu, 3/10/11 at 7:10 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
P.S. This was with Tomcat 7.0.10.
On 3/10/2011 9
Jess,
--- On Thu, 3/10/11 at 7:10 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
> P.S. This was with Tomcat 7.0.10.
>
> On 3/10/2011 9:10 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
> > I've been looking at moving to Tomcat 7 from Tomcat
> 6.
> >
> > Most things look good.
> >
> > I have been surprised by one thing, however: Tomcat 7
> p
P.S. This was with Tomcat 7.0.10.
On 3/10/2011 9:10 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
I've been looking at moving to Tomcat 7 from Tomcat 6.
Most things look good.
I have been surprised by one thing, however: Tomcat 7 produces larger
JSP class files than Tomcat 6 from the same JSP source files, tag
libr
I've been looking at moving to Tomcat 7 from Tomcat 6.
Most things look good.
I have been surprised by one thing, however: Tomcat 7 produces larger
JSP class files than Tomcat 6 from the same JSP source files, tag
libraries, etc. Around 12% larger in some examples I've been looking at
(where
14 matches
Mail list logo
