On 1/30/2013 3:27 PM, Jeff Sturm wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Williams, Nick [mailto:nicholas.willi...@ul.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:06 PM
I'm curious. I know that, being open source, the Tomcat project generally
welcomes
volunteers who want to contribute features or im
: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 2:06 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Thanks for the input, both of you. I will take a look at the activity
> in the repository and also i
> -Original Message-
> From: Williams, Nick [mailto:nicholas.willi...@ul.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:06 PM
>
> I'm curious. I know that, being open source, the Tomcat project generally
> welcomes
> volunteers who want to contribute features or improvements. However, I'd lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 2:06 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Thanks for the input, both of you. I will take a look at the
> activity in the repository and also inquire on the lists, as well
> as trying different implementations.
>
> I'm curious. I know that,
mailing list.
Dan
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:41 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:20
nks,
>
> Nick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:41 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Williams, Nick wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 1:08 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> I do not have a preferred implementation, no. I understand the
> basics of JMS and how it works, but I have never actually used it
> before. I do usually work with Spring Framework, but my
> understa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 11:20 AM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I
> understand that it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and
> that JMS is one of the specifications that Tomcat does not
> im
w well-maintained and up-to-date is
ActiveMQ? Can we expect work on the impending JMS 2.0 specification to begin
any time in the future?
Thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:41 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subjec
On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I understand
> that it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and that JMS is one of the
> specifications that Tomcat does not implement. However, I'm wondering if any
> Tomcat
Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I understand that
it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and that JMS is one of the
specifications that Tomcat does not implement. However, I'm wondering if any
Tomcat users out there have any experience with any JMS solutions t
11 matches
Mail list logo