>
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:29 PM Christopher Schultz <
> > ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> Dave,
> >>
> >> On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Both
hat was very helpful.
>>
>> Thank you Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:29 PM Christopher Schultz <
>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>>
> Dave,
>
> On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
>>>>> I am using Tomcat
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:47 AM Dave Bothwell
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based on the
> documentation it is clear that DBCP pooling has changed the maxActive
> attribute to maxTotal. However it is unclear, based on this d
was very helpful.
Thank you
Dave
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:29 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dave,
On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based
Chris,
That was very helpful.
Thank you
Dave
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:29 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dave,
>
> On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
> > I am using Tomc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dave,
On 1/3/20 13:47, Dave Bothwell wrote:
> I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based on
> the documentation it is clear that DBCP pooling has changed the
> maxActive attribute to maxTotal. However it is unclear,
,
I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based on the
documentation it is clear that DBCP pooling has changed the maxActive
attribute to maxTotal. However it is unclear, based on this document
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/jdbc-pool.html, if JDBC
pooling has also changed
Hello,
I am using Tomcat 8.5.11 with JDBC connection pooling. Based on the
documentation it is clear that DBCP pooling has changed the maxActive
attribute to maxTotal. However it is unclear, based on this document
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/jdbc-pool.html, if JDBC
pooling has also
Am 22.01.2016 um 12:35 schrieb R. Sriram:
Hello I am trying to establish connection pooling.
Should I be using dbcp?
If you want to use db connection pooling, it is probably a good idea to
use the pooling method the container gives you, as it will be used by a
lot of people and therefore has go
Hello I am trying to establish connection pooling.
Should I be using dbcp?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim,
On 2/17/2009 10:46 AM, trames wrote:
> Thanks, that is exactly what I did.
>
> Since the documentation stated that it used apache (tomcat's version) dbcp
> and the BasicDataSourceFactory, I looked at the source for this class
> through SVN. I
---
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Resource-JDBC-connection-pooling-USING-LDAP-tp22005711p22059917.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim,
On 2/13/2009 5:02 PM, trames wrote:
> My goal is to NOT embed the database connection user name, password, or even
> server url like it is shown below. I have the ApacheDS LDAP server set up,
> and would like to retrieve the credentials/server
I have found lot of examples on how to set up JDBC connection pooling using
the tags in context.xml.
My goal is to NOT embed the database connection user name, password, or even
server url like it is shown below. I have the ApacheDS LDAP server set up,
and would like to retrieve the
n you use.
-Original Message-
From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 10:05 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: jdbc connection pooling
We are about to start testing the jdbc connection pooling capabilities
within tomcat. I don't have any contro
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:16 -0600, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: jdbc connection pooling
> >
> > I'm going to try my best to not sound ignorant but can you better
> > explain what you mea
> From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: jdbc connection pooling
>
> I'm going to try my best to not sound ignorant but can you better
> explain what you mean when you say tomcat "manages" the connections
> compared to if the applicati
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 10:23 -0600, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: jdbc connection pooling
> >
> > The developer says that the jar file containing the
> > database driver should be published within the
work.
Since tomcat and your webapp both have to have access to the driver when
using container managed connection pools, it has to be in common/lib.
--David
Scott McClanahan wrote:
We are about to start testing the jdbc connection pooling capabilities
within tomcat. I don't have any con
> From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: jdbc connection pooling
>
> The developer says that the jar file containing the
> database driver should be published within the web
> applications WEB-INF/lib folder while I say it should
> be in $CATALINA_HOME
gt;
> > We are about to start testing the jdbc connection pooling capabilities
> > within tomcat. I don't have any control over the application instead
> > perform only administrative duties. Between the developers and myself
> > we have done a good bit of research a
I'm using the connection pooling on Tomcat 6.
And in my case i had to put the jar from the jdbc driver on.
$CATALINA_HOME/lib
On Jan 4, 2008 2:05 PM, Scott McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We are about to start testing the jdbc connection pooling capabilities
> within
We are about to start testing the jdbc connection pooling capabilities
within tomcat. I don't have any control over the application instead
perform only administrative duties. Between the developers and myself
we have done a good bit of research and mapped out a decent plan but
there i
You're absolutelly right Marc,
but the connection is being described by the connection context
containing the username and the password. Each application has its own
DB account, so as you have written bellow, the application gives the
connection back to the pool BUT only the same application
This sounds like poor coding to me. Your application should get the
connection object from the pool and immediately release when done. Having
an application hold onto a connection (especially in client/server) world is
bound to cause you to run out of connections or reach timeouts.
On 5/2/06, M
Hi all,
I have a problem with connection pooling.
Example:
- about 30 applications using the pool
- each application uses 1 DB username/password (30 users)
imagine following situation:
Only 1 application works hard, the others do nothing. This application
takes for example 80% of all possible co
26 matches
Mail list logo
