Yes, that's true:
if you use mod_jk and try to change headers via Apache config and
mod_headers, you are able to add headers, but not to change or remove
the ones coming from tomcat via mod_jk. mod_headers and mod_jk do not
interoperate nicely.
In general this will not give a good solution,
Apache is not overwritting my tomcat headers. Apache
is only appending more headers.
I added something like this:
Header append TODOS_LOS_ARCHIVOS "todos los
archivos"
Header append Cache-Control "no-store,
no-cache, must-revalidate"
Header append SOLO_PHP "todos los p
I think you misread your test-results.
We performed the same tests here, and the result was, that, if you
pass requests via mod_jk to Tomcat as a worker, Apache HTTPD did
definately not create / touch any headers but uses the ones returned
from the worker (Tomcat) via mod_jk.
Versions:
Tomcat 5.
proxy-revalidate,
> no-transform, pre-check=0,
> post-check=0, private");
> filterChain.doFilter(request, response);
> }
> }
>
>
>
> Original Message Follows
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> T
0,
post-check=0, private");
filterChain.doFilter(request, response);
}
}
Original Message Follows
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Http Header Cache-Control
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:17:54 -0500 (CDT)
H
Hi,
I'm still studying this problem. While checking the
HTML SPEC
(http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.4.4),
I find the following:
---
META and HTTP headers
The http-equiv attribute can be used in place of the
name attribute and has
I've got a great link for solving this problem. Take a
look at it. Hope that helps somebody.
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2004/03/03/filters.html
--- Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> To whom it may concern,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Something is wrong with t
To whom it may concern,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Something is wrong with that mod_jk version, by the way. The most
>> recent release of mod_jk is 1.2.23.
>
> Well, the installation file that I found in the server is named:
> mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so, that's why I assumed that version.
Strange. You
On 7/17/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is no way to influence HTTP headers by mod_jk.
You can manipulate Headers via mod_headers, which is part of Apache httpd.
when combining apache2 with tomcat 5 using mod_jk, mod_headers will
not touch any headers created by tomcat - we've
There is no way to influence HTTP headers by mod_jk.
You can manipulate Headers via mod_headers, which is part of Apache httpd.
If I remember correctly, in case Tomcat already sends a header,
mod_headers will not be able to remove or overwrite it, because mod_jk
will set the header Tomcat sent
Thanks Christopher,
> To whom it may concern,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've apache 1.3.36 + tomcat 4 + mod_jk 3.3
>
> Something is wrong with that mod_jk version, by the
> way. The most recent
> release of mod_jk is 1.2.23.
Well, the installation file that I found in the server
is nam
To whom it may concern,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've apache 1.3.36 + tomcat 4 + mod_jk 3.3
Something is wrong with that mod_jk version, by the way. The most recent
release of mod_jk is 1.2.23.
> I'm very new to web servers. I have a problem with the
> cache configuration of a tomcat web appli
Hello,
I've apache 1.3.36 + tomcat 4 + mod_jk 3.3
I'm very new to web servers. I have a problem with the
cache configuration of a tomcat web application. Using
a http headers inspector, I can see that no cache
control is been sent.
I'd like to send "CacheControl: no-cache" in the
header of eve
13 matches
Mail list logo
