java.io.PrintWriter;
import javax.servlet.Servlet;
import javax.servlet.ServletConfig;
import javax.servlet.ServletException;
import javax.servlet.ServletRequest;
import javax.servlet.ServletResponse;
/**
* This servlet program is used to print "Hello World" on
* client browser by implementi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 7/22/17 1:18 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> Roparzh,
>
> On 7/22/2017 12:14 AM, Roparzh Hemon wrote:
>> On my Mac 10.11.3 I've installed the Eclipse JEE IDE (Version:
>> Neon.3 Release (4.6.3)) I also installed apache-tomcat 9 on my
>> Mac, usin
're not using it
>1. remove the dependency plugin from the plugins node
>2. remove the compiler configuration from the compiler plugin
>3. remove the property from the properties node
> b. Keep the endorsed stuff
> 1. needed if you use the endorsed mechanism
>
. source pane
b. display pane
You don't even have to run the server if this occurs. If not, we can
then run it on the server by doing the following.
a. Run as -> Run on Server
b. Select Tomcat v9.0.0.M22
c. Click Next
d. Click Finish
A "Hello World!" page should pop up as a sepa
;s working, then you an
configure the IDE.
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/Unable-to-run-Hello-World-in-Eclipse-JEE-on-Mac-10-11-3-tp5065620p5065629.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list a
Roparzh,
On 7/22/2017 12:14 AM, Roparzh Hemon wrote:
> On my Mac 10.11.3 I've installed the Eclipse JEE IDE (Version: Neon.3
> Release (4.6.3)) I also installed apache-tomcat 9 on my Mac, using the
> following commands :
>
> sudo mkdir -p /usr/local sudo mv ~/Downloads/apache-tomcat-9.0.0.M21
> /
On my Mac 10.11.3 I've installed the Eclipse JEE IDE (Version: Neon.3
Release (4.6.3)) I also installed apache-tomcat 9 on my Mac, using the
following commands :
sudo mkdir -p /usr/local sudo mv ~/Downloads/apache-tomcat-9.0.0.M21
/usr/local sudo rm-f /Library/Tomcat sudo ln -s
/usr/local/apache-t
se to access the servlet ?
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Talia Selitsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Eclipse version Juno and Apache Tomcat 7. I am trying to run a
> basic Hello World web application.
> I am following all of the basic steps but I keep getting a Http 404
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah,
On 3/16/2011 10:47 PM, Noah Cutler wrote:
> I'll need to sort out DBCP, java singletons are nothing like php where a
> singleton exists for lifetime of the request, vs. lifetime of the
> application.
The servlet spec includes a "request" object
Chris,
will likely go with mod_jk, but I did notice that Jetty folks strongly
recommend mod_proxy (may be that their container works better with
mod_proxy)
I am not using a framework per se, one that I have written, so
definitely not something like Grails with Spring + Hibernate for
example. Gro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah,
On 3/16/2011 7:48 PM, Noah Cutler wrote:
> the Tomcat Groovy app will do nothing but serve up dynamic content
> (httpd will handle ssl as well), so whichever method (ajp or mod_proxy)
> peforms the best/is-most-reliable, I'll go with.
I have a
Chris, great feedback.
the Tomcat Groovy app will do nothing but serve up dynamic content
(httpd will handle ssl as well), so whichever method (ajp or mod_proxy)
peforms the best/is-most-reliable, I'll go with.
Love that 128mb JVM, I am very much interested in lean & mean. Coming
from LAMP stack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah,
On 3/15/2011 7:02 PM, Noah Cutler wrote:
> However, some of the LAMP stack apps will have legacy/archived
> functionality that I have zero interest/time in porting over to
> JVM/Groovy framework. So, the plan is to mod_rewrite archived requests
Thomas,
yes, I have seen a few sample mod_jk configs, does not look difficult to
implement.
Load balanced, per instance and/or virtual host setup with new DBCP,
what more could one ask for ;--)
I am really looking forward to generating dynamic content with Groovy on
Tomcat, quite lightweight com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Noah,
On 03/15/2011 07:05 PM, Noah Cutler wrote:
> Obviously per instance is a memory hungry solution, albeit highly
> convenient. Placing all sites in a single instance is a possibility as
> well (and the most resource "friendly"), but I would nee
Chris, thanks for the excellent feedback; thus far this list exceeds
Stackoverflow by orders of magnitude ;--)
Re: ease of implementation, yes, a single instance with multiple virtual
hosts is the way to go (similar setup to apache virtual hosts).
However, some of the LAMP stack apps will have le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah,
On 3/15/2011 2:05 PM, Noah Cutler wrote:
> Obviously per instance is a memory hungry solution, albeit highly
> convenient. Placing all sites in a single instance is a possibility as
> well (and the most resource "friendly"), but I would need to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noah,
On 3/15/2011 3:27 AM, Noah Cutler wrote:
> So, given that a running 32-bit JVM on Linux will require at least 1GB
> RAM, total memory usage will not be JVM footprint * num instances, but
> rather, JVM footprint + num instances?
Not necessarily.
Thomas, perfect, hours of searching Stackoverflow et al resolved in a
single mailing list thread ;--)
I will play around with various configs (per instance and multi-host per
instance) in my local devel to get an idea of no-load resource usage;
then, as you say, give some % more to avoid OOMEs in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Noah,
On 14.03.11 um 21:27, Noah Cutler wrote:
> So, given that a running 32-bit JVM on Linux will require at least 1GB
> RAM, total memory usage will not be JVM footprint * num instances, but
> rather, JVM footprint + num instances?
Actually, the
:://newminddevelopment.com
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 07:43 +0100, Thomas Freitag wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Noah,
>
> On 03/15/2011 06:25 AM, Noah Cutler wrote:
> > can find nothing on the net re: this apparently basic question.
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Noah,
On 03/15/2011 06:25 AM, Noah Cutler wrote:
> can find nothing on the net re: this apparently basic question.
>
> Given a simple hello world "app", what is the @memory footprint per
> instance in Tomcat 7?
>
> J
Hi,
can find nothing on the net re: this apparently basic question.
Given a simple hello world "app", what is the @memory footprint per
instance in Tomcat 7?
Just trying to assess options visa vi single instance + multiple virtual
hosts vs. multiple instance single host (preferred
On 30.06.2010 16:18, János Löbb wrote:
workers.properties
---
ps=/
worker.list=pub-app01, pub-app02, pub-app03, pub-app04, pub-app05, pub-lb
worker.pub-app01.type=ajp13
worker.pub-app01.host=app01
worker.pub-app01.port=8009
worker.pub-app01.socket_keepalive=1
worker.pub-app02.t
> workers.properties
> ---
> ps=/
>
> worker.list=pub-app01, pub-app02, pub-app03, pub-app04, pub-app05, pub-lb
>
> worker.pub-app01.type=ajp13
> worker.pub-app01.host=app01
> worker.pub-app01.port=8009
> worker.pub-app01.socket_keepalive=1
>
> worker.pub-app02.type=ajp13
> worke
I now have made the change and it seems to be working (fingers crossed).
I have a couple of people testing it out, so fingers crossed!
OK, it now works correctly. The only issue I have is that Apache is now
adding .number to the end of each request.
If I go to myapp/forum, the first time I g
On 30.06.2010 13:10, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
have you also set de directive in de workers.properties I suggested?
in your case that should look like
worker.pub-app01.domain=pub-app01
etc
My apologies, I am doing 10 things at the time and missed that bit.
I now have made the change and it s
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but I just checked how
our stuff is set up here and wondered if you have the jvm route mapped
in the server xml for the tomcat instances you want loadbalanced?
Paul
Tomcats:
All of them have a jvmRoute of pub-app0X, where X goes fro
have you also set de directive in de workers.properties I suggested?
in your case that should look like
worker.pub-app01.domain=pub-app01
etc
My apologies, I am doing 10 things at the time and missed that bit.
I now have made the change and it seems to be working (fingers crossed).
I have
On 30/06/2010 11:33, M.H.G. Emmerig wrote:
> you beat me to it I think
>
> regards
>
> Milko Emmerig
> I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but I just checked how
> our stuff is set up here and wondered if you have the jvm route mapped
> in the server xml for the tomcat instances you
Subject
Please respond to Re: Hello and Tomcat issues with
"Tomcat Users sticky sessions
y have the
jvmRoute set:
for the first, server
for the second, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Tabares [mailto:gabriel.taba...@roboreus.com]
Sent: 30 June 2010 11:17
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Hello and Tomcat issues with sticky sessions
Hi everybody,
I have be
Yes sorry! Slow morning here today.. :)
From: M.H.G. Emmerig [mailto:m.h.g.emme...@dnb.nl]
Sent: 30 June 2010 11:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Hello and Tomcat issues with sticky sessions
you beat me to it I think
regards
Milko Emmerig
"Ockleford Paul (NHS Connecting for H
2010 12:31
Subject
RE: Hello and Tomcat issues with
Please respond to sticky sessions
"Tomcat Users
Hello gabriel
I think you should have the following in your configuration:
in de workers definition something like
worker.pub-app01.domain=pub-app01-jvm
and in your tomcat server.xml
regards
Milko Emmerig
.taba...@roboreus.com]
Sent: 30 June 2010 11:17
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Hello and Tomcat issues with sticky sessions
Hi everybody,
I have been running Tomcat on production for a few years with no problem
but now, after moving to a new company, I am completely unable to get
session stick
Hi everybody,
I have been running Tomcat on production for a few years with no problem
but now, after moving to a new company, I am completely unable to get
session stickyness working.
The setup is as follows:
Apache 2.2.3 (CentOS 5.4 version) -> Tomcat 6.0.24.
I have tried all of mod_proxy
On 06/01/2010 11:09, Cristobal Castro wrote:
> hello
> i just installed tomcat on win xp, now how can i set my firt project ? i
> see the tomcat folder in C:, do i need to put my first program in one of
> those folders? just like i did with normal apache ? (ex htdocs folder ->
>
hello
i just installed tomcat on win xp, now how can i set my firt project ? i
see the tomcat folder in C:, do i need to put my first program in one of
those folders? just like i did with normal apache ? (ex htdocs folder ->
called on browser by http://localhost/nameOfYourFile)
thanks
--
h
009 at 7:14 PM, veena pandit wrote:
>
> > http://www.jsptut.com/
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
> > chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > From: veena pandit [mailto:v.kri...@gmail.com]
> > > >
:
>
> > > From: veena pandit [mailto:v.kri...@gmail.com]
> > > Subject: Re: hello world
> > >
> > > it was chapter 1 in a web based tutorial for JSP. :-)
> >
> > Can you provide a link to the tutorial? I'd like to see what it says.
> >
> &g
http://www.jsptut.com/
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: veena pandit [mailto:v.kri...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: hello world
> >
> > it was chapter 1 in a web based tutorial for JSP. :-)
>
> From: veena pandit [mailto:v.kri...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: hello world
>
> it was chapter 1 in a web based tutorial for JSP. :-)
Can you provide a link to the tutorial? I'd like to see what it says.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHE
Well I had to know, because it was chapter 1 in a web based tutorial for
JSP. :-)
Thanks,
Veena
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:15 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> veena pandit wrote:
>
>> It was actually:
>>
>> http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello/Hello.html. Sorry for the misp
>> http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello/Hello.html. Sorry for the misprint.
>>
> This must be the longest-running thread about a Hello World application
> ever, in any programming language.
> :-)
It looks to me that you should remove the webapps from the url.
What is your l
veena pandit wrote:
It was actually:
http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello/Hello.html. Sorry for the misprint.
This must be the longest-running thread about a Hello World application
ever, in any programming language
It was actually:
http://localhost:8080/webapps/Hello/Hello.html. Sorry for the misprint.
Veena
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:07 AM, S Arvind wrote:
> What path you gave to get that html in browser?
>
> -Arvind S
>
> *
> "Many of lifes failure are people who did not real
ey gave up."
> -Thomas Edison
> *
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:48 AM, veena pandit wrote:
>
> > How to configure Hello.html in Tomcat?
> >
> > Where do I place the following file? How to access it from the server?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello, world
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Veena
> >
>
gt;
> Where do I place the following file? How to access it from the server?
>
>
>
>
> Hello, world
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Veena
>
> From: S Arvind [mailto:arvindw...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: hello world
>
> rename the file name to index.html , or change the welcome page entry
> in web.xml to hello.html
As previously stated, that's a really bad idea. It would overwrite Tomcat's
default home pa
rename the file name to index.html , or change the welcome page entry in
web.xml to hello.html
-Arvind S
*
"Many of lifes failure are people who did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up."
-Thomas Edison
*
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:23 AM, veena pandit wrote:
> I tried pla
I tried placing it in a webapps directory under tomcat root. do i need to
configure in web.xml?
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Hassan Schroeder <
hassan.schroe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:18 PM, veena pandit wrote:
> > How to configure Hello.html in Tomcat?
> >
> > Where
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:18 PM, veena pandit wrote:
> How to configure Hello.html in Tomcat?
>
> Where do I place the following file? How to access it from the server?
Where did you try placing it, and what makes you think that wasn't
the right place?
--
Hassan Schroeder -
How to configure Hello.html in Tomcat?
Where do I place the following file? How to access it from the server?
Hello, world
Thanks,
Veena
André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> [...]
>>> I'm not privy to the thought processes behind the packaging of the
>>> .exe and .zip downloads, but I don't like it, whatever it was. I
>>> think all bits and pieces should be in all the packages. The .exe
>>> in
Mark Thomas wrote:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
[...]
I'm not privy to the thought processes behind the packaging of the .exe and
.zip downloads, but I don't like it, whatever it was. I think all bits and
pieces should be in all the packages. The .exe installer could be made smart
enough to
ned within this transmission.
> From: chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:55:16 -0600
> Subject: RE: Hello
>
> > From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> > Subject: Re: Hello
> >
> > I understand that,
Can people please use something a little more descriptive than "Hello"?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Thomas"
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Hello
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [m
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
>> Subject: Re: Hello
>>
>> I understand that, but how would a newbie understand this ?
>
> Read the mailing list?
>
>> I didn't know that. But who (other than an expert) woul
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Hello
>
> I understand that, but how would a newbie understand this ?
Read the mailing list?
> I didn't know that. But who (other than an expert) would
> know that, looking at those links alone ?
Actual
Pieter Temmerman wrote:
Luckily I'm not a windows user, because all of this seems rather
confusing to me.
It is confusing to anyone, except the wizards themselves.
There are rumors going around that this is exactly the point.
---
[mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> >> Subject: Re: Hello
> >>
> >> Vista 32-bit -> 32-bit Java JDK or JRE
> >> Vista 64-bit -> 64-bit Java JDK or JRE
> >
> > Not necessarily true. I run both 32- and 64-bit versions of the JVM on my
> > Vista 64 box, be
So apparently, I did end up make it more complicated than it is.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: Hello
Vista 32-bit -> 32-bit Java JDK or JRE
Vista 64-bit -> 64-bit Java JDK or JRE
Not necessarily true. I run both 32- and 64-bit ve
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Hello
>
> Vista 32-bit -> 32-bit Java JDK or JRE
> Vista 64-bit -> 64-bit Java JDK or JRE
Not necessarily true. I run both 32- and 64-bit versions of the JVM on my
Vista 64 box, because some browsers only come i
Okey Kene wrote:
Hi,
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache tomcat to download.
Smartass answer :
You can download any version you like, using IE or Firefox.
;-)
..
Less smartass :
If you intend to also run Tomcat under Vista :
(and as a redemption for the
Okey Kene wrote:
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache tomcat
to download.
Are you planning to write webapps or are you only wishing to deploy
webapps you've acquired from other sources?
If you wish to learn to write JEE webapps, then I recommend the
latest version (
> From: Mehrotra, Anurag [mailto:amehro...@telebright.com]
> Subject: RE: Hello
>
> If you are using vista 64 bit, do not use the windows installer/exe.
Not true, the installer works fine on my Vista 64 box. The tomcat6.exe program
in the installer (and also in the .zip download) i
communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Hello
> From: Okey K
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Okey Kene [mailto:keneo...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Hello
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of
apache tomcat to download.
Resisting the temptation to answer "42", ..
i was going to say the unisex version. but i did answer more app
> From: Okey Kene [mailto:keneo...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Hello
>
> Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of
> apache tomcat to download.
Resisting the temptation to answer "42", you should be aware that Tomcat is
pure Java, so any of the downloadable pa
Okey Kene wrote:
Hi,
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache tomcat
to download.
cheers!
**
**
**
**
*
*
/Regards.../
/Okey Kene /
either 5.x or 6.0
64bit or 32 b
Dear Okey,
Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache
tomcat to download.
Any version you like.
--
Kees Jan
http://java-monitor.com/forum/
kjkos...@kjkoster.org
06-51838192
Rule 1 for being in a hole: stop digging.
--
Hi, Am using windows vista and i wish to know what version of apache tomcat to download.cheers! Regards...Okey Kene
access?
On Thu, 18
Sep 2008, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
> > Subject: hello world
> >
> > I'm running Ubuntu:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
>
> I thought mentats weren't supposed to use computers.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:54:33 -0400, H. Hall wrote:
> When I installed Netbeans 6.1, the installer also installed Tomcat
> 6.0.14. This was on a windows pc but I would find it very amazing if the
> Linux version of NB6.1 installed a TC 5.5. Is is possible that a
> tomcat installed with Ubuntu?
thufir wrote:
This cuts across IDE, OS and server.
I'm running Ubuntu:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 8.04.1"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get upda
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:10:20 -0400, Steve Ochani wrote:
>> Now rather than recriminating at aeternum, does anyone know how to
>> track down said packager, so that maybe he could come here and see the
>> errors of his ways, or at least explain his logic here ? Same as for
>> Debian Tomcat5.5 itsel
Send reply to: Tomcat Users List
Date sent: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:09:11 +0200
From: André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: hello world
> Now rather than recriminating at aeternum, do
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: hello world
>
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> >> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
> >> Subject: Re: hello world
> >>
> >> If Apache installs then why not tomcat?
> >
> > Apache is a sof
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
Subject: Re: hello world
If Apache installs then why not tomcat?
Apache is a software organization with numerous products; if by "Apache" you
mean httpd, it may be because the 3rd-party developer
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
> Subject: Re: hello world
>
> If Apache installs then why not tomcat?
Apache is a software organization with numerous products; if by "Apache" you
mean httpd, it may be because the 3rd-party developers are more fam
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:50:18 -0500, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> Do I need to install Tomcat 5.5 from Ubuntu
>
> We've had no end of problems with 3rd-party repackaged versions of
> Tomcat.
Ok, yeah, I've seen mention of that, but thought that must be in error.
If Apache installs then why not
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:02:42 -0400, Brantley Hobbs wrote:
>> I thought mentats weren't supposed to use computers...
>>
Later on they do :)
>>
> No matter what, the spice must flow. If it takes a computer, it takes a
> computer.
Yes :)
-Thufir
---
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
Subject: hello world
I'm running Ubuntu:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
I thought mentats weren't supposed to use computers...
No matter what, the spice must flow. If it takes a computer,
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of thufir
> Subject: hello world
>
> I'm running Ubuntu:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
I thought mentats weren't supposed to use computers...
> Do I need to install Tomcat 5.5 from Ubuntu
We've had no end of problems w
This cuts across IDE, OS and server.
I'm running Ubuntu:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 8.04.1"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get
Thanks very much for the troubleshooting Chuck. This completely solved
the problem and shaved a couple dozen bytes off my war file :)
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mark Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
$ cat META-INF/context.xml
n.xml
OR
in $CATALINA_HOMEconf/server.xml for - Original Message -
From: "Mark Hawkes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
F
> From: Mark Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
>
> $ cat META-INF/context.xml
>reloadable="true" debug="0">
>
>
Take out the path and docBase attributes - they're not all
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mark Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
The structure looks good.
META-INF/context.xml
WEB-INF/web.xml
What's in the above two files?
$ cat META-INF/context.xml
$ cat WEB-INF/web.xml
> From: Mark Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
The structure looks good.
> META-INF/context.xml
> WEB-INF/web.xml
What's in the above two files?
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHE
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:21 -0500, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: Mark Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
> >
> > I've erased my CLASSPATH environment variable but
> > I still have the exact
> From: Mark Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
>
> I've erased my CLASSPATH environment variable but
> I still have the exact same error in catalina.out
> when Tomcat starts up.
What exactly is in your hello-wo
at 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
>
> Looks like you have the same classes being loaded by multiple
> classloaders.
>
> > CLASSPATH =
> > .:/apache-tomcat-5.5.23/common/lib/servlet-api.jar:
> > /apache-tomcat-5.5.23/common/lib/jsp-api.jar
>
> None of tha
> From: Mark Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
Looks like you have the same classes being loaded by multiple
classloaders.
> CLASSPATH =
> .:/apache-tomcat-5.5.23/common/lib/servlet-api.jar:
> /apache-tomcat-5.5.23
The error's exactly the same if I deploy the war file using the manager
webapp's deploy feature. Here's what appears in catalina.out when I
undeploy and then redeploy hello-world.war:
--
Jun 15, 2007 3:28:35 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployWAR
INFO
with good tools.
Neocollec
> Subject: Tomcat 5.5.23: Cannot Deploy hello-world.war
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:00:16 +0100
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a HelloWorld servlet.
Hi all,
I have a HelloWorld servlet. Real simple. Packaged as hello-world.war.
I copy it to $CATALINA_HOME/webapps. My environment:
Operating System: Fedora Core 5 Linux 2.6.15-1.2054
Java Version: 1.6.0-b105
JAVA_HOME = /opt/SDK/jdk
CATALINA_HOME = /apache-tomcat-5.5.23
CLASSPATH
=
.:/apache
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as
a binary attachment.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
99 matches
Mail list logo
