On 04/01/2011 10:34, Joe Biron wrote:
>>> Is there a better way to do this? Should my application handle these
>>> timeouts, and use the comet.timeout as a longer safety net?
>>
>> That sounds like the way to do it to me.
>>
>> Mark
>
> Thanks. It would be great if the comet event "pump" gave me a
>> Is there a better way to do this? Should my application handle these
>> timeouts, and use the comet.timeout as a longer safety net?
>
> That sounds like the way to do it to me.
>
> Mark
Thanks. It would be great if the comet event "pump" gave me a
PRE_TIMEOUT subevent, but at least I know what
On 03/01/2011 21:54, Joe Biron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been making great progress with CometProcessor on Tomcat 6.0.29.
> I have a question about handling timeouts (and I did review this
> thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tomcat.apache.org/msg55616.html).
>
> I want my clients to connec
Hello,
I've been making great progress with CometProcessor on Tomcat 6.0.29.
I have a question about handling timeouts (and I did review this
thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tomcat.apache.org/msg55616.html).
I want my clients to connect and stay connected for a very long time,
but I do
