On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 09:03 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> I've tested it, and it seems to work fine.
> Here is what you are probably missing
>
> Machine A
>
>
>
> Machine B
>
>
Thank you, it does work now.
Ed
---
I've tested it, and it seems to work fine.
Here is what you are probably missing
Machine A
Machine B
As you can see, the ports have to match up. In your config, it does add
the member correctly, but then the TcpFailureDetector will verify the
members existence, and if there is no me
I will look into this for you
Filip
Gmail User wrote:
I am trying to configure a cluster with static members, but so far no
luck. Am I missing something or is it not meant to be tested with both
members on localhost?
Both instances create their own sessions and no session propagation is
recorde
I am trying to configure a cluster with static members, but so far no
luck. Am I missing something or is it not meant to be tested with both
members on localhost?
Both instances create their own sessions and no session propagation is
recorded in the logs. The log also shows that there are no activ
I am trying to configure a cluster with static members, but so far no
luck. Am I missing something or is it not meant to be tested with both
members on localhost?
Both instances create their own sessions and no session propagation is
recorded in the logs. The log also shows that there are no activ
