Re: Confusion about session replication

2013-07-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Alec, On 7/24/13 4:38 PM, Tomcat Random wrote: > So set the LB stickiness to the same > n number as in web.xml. That's what I'd do, if... >> "Assuming that the lb is updating the last-touch time for every >> request mentioning the session" > > Co

Re: Confusion about session replication

2013-07-24 Thread Tomcat Random
Thanks Chris - Sorry for the unintended anonymity. My name's Alec. So set the LB stickiness to the same n number as in web.xml. "Assuming that the lb is updating the last-touch time for every request mentioning the session" Could you explain this a little further. How would the LB be monitoring r

Re: Confusion about session replication

2013-07-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 To whom it may concern, (Might we know your real name? The above introduction feels so impersonal...) On 7/24/13 11:13 AM, Tomcat Random wrote: > Setup: - Two physical servers each running Tomcat 7.0.42 - Brocade > load balancer in front > > The l

Confusion about session replication

2013-07-24 Thread Tomcat Random
Setup: - Two physical servers each running Tomcat 7.0.42 - Brocade load balancer in front The load balancer is set to source IP persistence for 5 minutes. This time can be changed of course. The thing I don't understand is 5 minutes or 5 hours - at then end that time limit the user can be sent to