On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On 1/6/06, Michael Czeiszperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 5, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Sorry, for the potentially redundant question, but to clarify, is the
APR version of Tomcat officially released? The last time I check
On 1/6/06, Michael Czeiszperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Sorry, for the potentially redundant question, but to clarify, is the
> APR version of Tomcat officially released? The last time I checked it
> was not. I don't care either way, but w
On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Duan, Nick wrote:
Thanks Michael for the info. J2EE performance testing depends on many
different factors. Some questions/suggestions for your consideration:
1. It wasn't clear from your report what the HW/SW spec of your test
clients (load workstation). Base
On Jan 5, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On 1/5/06, Michael Czeiszperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Also a Tomcat 5.5.12 (or better 5.5.15) with and without APR test
against recent IBM, Sun, and BEA offerings would be really nice :-)
On 1/5/06, ALEX HYDE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stupid question Remy but are you refering to the
> proces per java thread issue that had effected Linux?
> I am well behind the times so is this all resolved? I
> am soon to set-up a Tomcat server, preferably on Linux
> FC3 with a 2.6 kernal. Would
On 1/5/06, Michael Czeiszperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
>
> > Also a Tomcat 5.5.12 (or better 5.5.15) with and without APR test
> > against recent IBM, Sun, and BEA offerings would be really nice :-)
> >
>
> We did a previous test with tomcat aga
Stupid question Remy but are you refering to the
proces per java thread issue that had effected Linux?
I am well behind the times so is this all resolved? I
am soon to set-up a Tomcat server, preferably on Linux
FC3 with a 2.6 kernal. Would you know whether this is
suitable for running Tomcat under
Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
At the enterprise level businesses pay for support, and at the
highest levels of support the license the source for a product is
under makes little difference to the end customer, which is why its a
good business model for the likes of IBM.
(Note that our own p
On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Also a Tomcat 5.5.12 (or better 5.5.15) with and without APR test
against recent IBM, Sun, and BEA offerings would be really nice :-)
We did a previous test with tomcat against those servers, and are
waiting for APR to be officially released
On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
With the usage of APR in Tomcat 5.5.x, I would say the difference will
be even bigger, as APR on Linux will use more efficient IO calls than
on Windows.
So use Linux :) (note: please, don't use any Redhat Linux 2.4s
kernels, though)
Yes, we
On Jan 5, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Thinking about this a bit more, though, I guess this conviction
comes from experience with really large and complex web
applications. When most of the code being run is not servlet
engine code, then it stands to reason that the bulk of the r
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On 1/5/06, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also a Tomcat 5.5.12 (or better 5.5.15) with and without APR test
against recent IBM, Sun, and BEA offerings would be really nice :-)
There seems to be a silly notion out there that because you pay for
commercial offerin
On 1/5/06, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
> >
> >> Interesting. In enterprise environments, I also hear it common to
> >> see antivirus software also run on windows servers too. (Yes, you
> >> read that correctly
On 1/5/06, Michael Czeiszperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought that Tomcat users would be interested to know that we just
> published an in-depth comparison of Tomcat performance on Windows and
> Linux.
>
> The articles are available here:
>
> http://webperformance.com/library/reports
>
> I
m: Michael Czeiszperger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 1:43 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Comparing Tomcat Performance on Windows vs. Linux
I thought that Tomcat users would be interested to know that we just
published an in-depth comparison of Tomcat performance
Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
On Jan 5, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
Interesting. In enterprise environments, I also hear it common to
see antivirus software also run on windows servers too. (Yes, you
read that correctly) I'd be curious to see how much or a
performance decrease there
Ours is more of a small-to-medium environment than it is enterprise, but
we put antivirus on our servers...
Tim Funk wrote:
Interesting. In enterprise environments, I also hear it common to see
antivirus software also run on windows servers too. (Yes, you read
that correctly) I'd be curious t
On Jan 5, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
Interesting. In enterprise environments, I also hear it common to
see antivirus software also run on windows servers too. (Yes, you
read that correctly) I'd be curious to see how much or a
performance decrease there is when one is turned on.
Interesting. In enterprise environments, I also hear it common to see
antivirus software also run on windows servers too. (Yes, you read that
correctly) I'd be curious to see how much or a performance decrease there is
when one is turned on.
-Tim
Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
I thought that T
I thought that Tomcat users would be interested to know that we just
published an in-depth comparison of Tomcat performance on Windows and
Linux.
The articles are available here:
http://webperformance.com/library/reports
It describes the very different behavior of the two platforms under
20 matches
Mail list logo
