Re: CPong error

2008-04-28 Thread darinpope
http://www.nabble.com/CPong-error-tp16918132p16939879.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

Re: CPong error

2008-04-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Darin, darinpope schrieb: With this release, we were adding in some timeouts based on the recommendations from http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html Previously, our workers.properties looked

Re: CPong error

2008-04-27 Thread darinpope
ot necessary or if I'm tuning incorrectly for Windows, can you give me some better settings to try? Thanks, Darin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CPong-error-tp16918132p16922484.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list a

Re: CPong error

2008-04-27 Thread Rainer Jung
darinpope schrieb: We've been doing some reconfiguration to try to track down some issues and with one of the changes, we are now getting a number of errors (but not all the time) like this one: [8624:1188] [info] jk_ajp_common.c (840): awaited reply cpong, received 3 instead [8624:1188] [info]

Re: CPong error

2008-04-27 Thread Mladen Turk
darinpope wrote: In all instances of the error, it always says "received 3 instead". Any idea what could be causing this issue? Probably the 10 second timeout or is too low. Regards -- (TM) - To start a new topic, e-mail:

CPong error

2008-04-26 Thread darinpope
D73C7.reference=worker.template-worker worker.810ED18641A24B1784CF0575992D73C7.host=192.168.1.100 worker.810ED18641A24B1784CF0575992D73C7.port=8209 server.xml AJP: -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CPong-error-tp16918132p16918132.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing