Hi Christopher,
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 7:28 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
> > Should I report this problem somewhere, e.g
rs List' Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Baked-in
>> context paths
>>
>> Hi Jeffrey,
>>
>>> -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Janner
>>> [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com] Sent: Wednesday, November
>>> 13, 2013 5:14 PM To: 'Tomcat Users
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 6:14 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
> > -Origin
Hi Jeffrey,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:14 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
> The thing is, the garbage characters at t
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:17 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Konstan
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:09 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
> > -Original Message-
>
Hi Jeffrey,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:22 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
I'm also using Outlook, but for me it only
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 9:55 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
> > -Original Message-
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:07 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
>
> Jeff,
>
> On 11/7/13, 10:17 AM, Jeffrey Ja
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> But nobody in their right mind uses
> "../../../.." to get to the context-path (which, by definition is
> relative to the host)... instead they use request.getContextPath() and
> then tack-on a context-relative link to the end of it.
You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Milo,
On 11/7/13, 2:46 PM, Milo Hyson wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
>> The only way to reliably mutate context-paths during proxying is
>> to re-write the headers and content of the pages. It's
>> miserable.
>
On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> What I'm saying is that from a practical point of view, when writing
> dynamic web applications, context-relative links are always the way to go.
>
> I'm not sure how much more I can say on this topic and nobody else
> seems to care so I'
On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> The only way to reliably mutate context-paths during proxying is to
> re-write the headers and content of the pages. It's miserable.
Perhaps YOUR experiences have been miserable, but clearly that's not the case
for everyone. The only hea
[OT] RE: Baked-in
>> context paths
>>
>>> -Original Message- From: Leo Donahue - OETX
>>> [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov] Subject: RE: Baked-in
>>> context paths
>>>
>>>
>>> B�K
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Leo,
On 11/6/13, 6:06 PM, Leo Donahue - OETX wrote:
>> From: Leo Donahue - OETX [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov]
>> Subject: RE: Baked-in context paths
>>
>>
>> I'm not convinced relative links are bad, no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Milo,
On 11/6/13, 5:22 PM, Milo Hyson wrote:
> I wasn't trying to "play games," I was trying to route HTTP
> requests. Again, this is something I have done, without incident,
> for many years. It's possible I've just been lucky, but it's also
> poss
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Donahue - OETX [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 4:29 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Leo
>From: Leo Donahue - OETX [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov]
>Subject: RE: Baked-in context paths
>
>
>I'm not convinced relative links are bad, nor that one should not try to use
>them because they are easy to get wrong.
>
From the spec: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/r
>-Original Message-
>From: Leo Donahue - OETX [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov]
>Subject: RE: Baked-in context paths
>
>
>B�KK
>KKCB�� [��X��ܚX�KK[XZ[
>
>� \�\��][��X��ܚX�P �X�]
>�\X�
I wasn't trying to "play games," I was trying to route HTTP requests. Again,
this is something I have done, without incident, for many years. It's possible
I've just been lucky, but it's also possible this isn't as big of a deal as you
seem to think.
I often employ common header content as you
>-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>Subject: Re: Baked-in context paths
>
>I'm arguing from a welf-contained web-app standpoint ... in order to get into
>trouble with relative links.
Right.
And I thought th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Milo,
On 11/6/13, 1:48 PM, Milo Hyson wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
>> Any time dynamic content is generated, there exists a great deal
>> of risk that relative URLs will make page links fail (that is,
>> you
So basically you're saying it's not that relative links are bad per se, it's
just that in some cases they can be tricky to get right?
- Milo Hyson
Chief Scientist
CyberLife Labs, Inc.
On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Any time dynamic
> content is generated, there exis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Leo,
On 11/5/13, 4:35 PM, Leo Donahue - OETX wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Leo Donahue - OETX
>> [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov] Subject: RE: Baked-in
>> context paths
>>
>
> I will concede there a
>-Original Message-
>From: Leo Donahue - OETX [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov]
>Subject: RE: Baked-in context paths
>
I will concede there are issues even in this example. Such as the reference to
the /plannet/PlanNetGuide.pdf in the side_nav_left.xhtml of the op
>-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>Subject: Re: Baked-in context paths
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>Leo,
>
>>
>I think it's worth pointing-out that the original discussio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Leo,
On 11/5/13, 2:23 PM, Leo Donahue - OETX wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Milo Hyson
>> [mailto:m...@cyberlifelabs.com] Subject: Baked-in context paths
>>
>> As suggested, I'm bringing this issu
>-Original Message-
>From: Milo Hyson [mailto:m...@cyberlifelabs.com]
>Subject: Baked-in context paths
>
>As suggested, I'm bringing this issue to the list so that I might understand
>the
>thinking behind an argued best practice. In
>https://issues.apache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Milo,
On 11/5/13, 1:35 PM, Milo Hyson wrote:
> As suggested, I'm bringing this issue to the list so that I might
> understand the thinking behind an argued best practice. In
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 it is
> said t
As suggested, I'm bringing this issue to the list so that I might understand
the thinking behind an argued best practice. In
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 it is said that the
correct way for a Tomcat application to construct internally-referencing URLs
is to include t
30 matches
Mail list logo
