On 21/03/2013 13:03, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 3/21/13 5:49 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 21/03/2013 00:13, igaz wrote:
>>> I was curious as to people's actual experience with setting a
>>> Connector's acceptorThreadCount while using the BIO http
>>> connection (the default)
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 3/21/13 5:49 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/03/2013 00:13, igaz wrote:
>> I was curious as to people's actual experience with setting a
>> Connector's acceptorThreadCount while using the BIO http
>> connection (the default)
>>
>> Frankly,
On 21/03/2013 00:13, igaz wrote:
> I was curious as to people's actual experience with setting a Connector's
> acceptorThreadCount while using the BIO http connection (the default)
>
> Frankly, I was unaware that java.net.ServerSockets were multi-thread safe
> (although interestingly the javadoc e
etChannels are)
Has anyone seen throughput increase with larger # of acceptorThreads? Did
you set it == to # of hardware threads?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/BIO-acceptorThreadCount-tp4996539.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at
