Re: Access-log ordering

2013-04-19 Thread Rainer Jung
On 18.04.2013 23:58, Christopher Schultz wrote: Mark is of course right. Adding some info here concerning your log format: > We are using the following format string: > "%a %t "%r" %s %D" > The value of "%t" is the interesting one, of course, but it's > resolution is only in seconds, and we are

Re: Access-log ordering

2013-04-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 4/18/13 6:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 18/04/2013 22:58, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> So, this is my due diligence to determine if, in addition to the >> mountain of evidence we otherwise have, Tomcat does in fact log >> requests in th

Re: Access-log ordering

2013-04-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/04/2013 22:58, Christopher Schultz wrote: > So, this is my due diligence to determine if, in addition to the > mountain of evidence we otherwise have, Tomcat does in fact log > requests in the order in which they are received. Tomcat logs requests in the order they complete (so it can log th

Access-log ordering

2013-04-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, I suspect I already know the answer to this, but I wanted to double-check. Requests are logged to the access log in the order in which they were accepted from the connector, right? Or, if they can't be guaranteed to be de-queued-and-dispatched